Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
-362- waste, which could result in odor and taste problems in drinking water. Water in wood waste could also result in accelerated decomposition and settling, which could harm the cover and render it ineffective to protect the public from sharp objects or habitat for disease vectors. Concerning New Rule XXVIII(1)(b), requiring placement of six inches of cover at least every three months, EPA regulations provide that, for protection from fires or disease vectors, the "periodic application of cover material" may be required. 40 CFR 257.3-8(b). "Periodic application of cover material" is defined as the "application and compaction of soil or other suitable material over disposed solid waste at the end of each operating day or at such frequencies and in such a manner as to reduce the risk of fire and to impede disease vectors' access to the waste." 40 CFR 257.3-8(e)(6). Therefore, this requirement for the application of six inches of an approved cover is equivalent to the federal requirement in 40 CFR 257.3-8, and the finding requirements of 75-10-107, MCA, are not triggered. However, based on the experience of the department's solid waste section supervisor in managing the program and inspecting solid waste landfill facilities over 17 years, six inches of cover placed at least every three months is necessary to reduce the risk of fire and to impair the disease vectors' access to the waste. In at least two Class III landfill units where at least six inches of cover have not been placed at least every three months, fires have occurred and large numbers of mosquitoes have been observed. This requirement has been shown to be achievable because it has been followed under the existing rules and has been shown to be good management practice for many years, and there are no technological barriers to meeting this requirement. Because this requirement is equivalent to the EPA's regulation, there is no additional cost. However, the estimated costs to the regulated community, for each of 33 Class III landfill facilities, would be $2,018/acre based on the $2.50/cubic yard cost of the placement of 807 cubic yards of additional six-inch soil cover per acre of open area. There would be four applications of cover per year for a total cost of $8,072/acre. Concerning New Rule XXVIII(1)(d)(ii), pertaining to access, EPA prohibits uncontrolled public access that would subject people to health and safety hazards. 40 CFR 257.3-8(d). Therefore, the restriction for this purpose is not more stringent than a comparable federal regulation. The new rule limits and controls access and prevents unauthorized vehicular traffic and illegal dumping of wastes by requiring artificial or natural barriers. There is no comparable federal regulation for Class III landfill units, so the findings requirements of 75-10-107, MCA, are not applicable. It is necessary to limit access by unauthorized people to prevent illegal dumping of waste and to protect them from injury from heavy equipment and sharp objects. See Response to Comment No. 72 concerning stringency. COMMENT NO. 40: A commentor stated that, in (1)(b), provision should be made concerning cover requirements for Class III landfills, such as the one owned by the commentor, that contain significant amounts of clean dirt, soil and earthen materials, and no tires. The commentor suggested that a situation like this could be handled in the O & M plan on file with the landfill license, and that quarterly cover of at least six inches is not necessary. Montana Administrative Register 3-2/11/10
-363- RESPONSE: Proposed New Rule XXVIII(1)(b) is substantively the same as existing ARM 17.50.511(2). Existing ARM 17.50.511 is being repealed. See Response to Comment No. 72 concerning stringency. There is no comparable federal regulation for Class III landfill units, so the findings requirements of 75-10- 107, MCA, are not applicable. The department believes that a minimum quarterly cover of six inches is necessary to prevent fires and to protect against disease vectors such as mosquitoes. See Response to Comment No. 39. NEW RULE XXIX COMMENT NO. 41: A commentor disagreed with the requirements of New Rule XXIX for methane control, financial assurance, runoff controls, ground water monitoring, and liners at Class IV landfill units. The commentor stated that the department was requiring Class II and Class IV units to be operated in the same way, and that this made it prohibitively expensive for a Class IV landfill to be developed and operated. The commentor stated that the only difference between a Class II and a Class IV landfill in the rules is that cover is required every 90 days for a Class IV landfill versus the requirement of daily cover for a Class II landfill, but the design standards are about the same. The commentor stated that he has asked the department numerous times how many stand-alone Class IV landfills are found in Montana and how many have been licensed in the last ten years or so, and that he believes the answer is none. The commentor stated that the stand-alone Class IV landfill rules should be deleted and that the department should rethink regulation of Class IV landfills. The commentor also questioned the department's authority, under the federal Subtitle D regulations, to pass these Class IV rules, because they are more stringent than the federal regulations. RESPONSE: The department agrees that New Rule XXIX is equivalent to the existing Class IV landfill unit requirements in ARM 17.50.511(3)(c), 17.50.530, 17.50.531, and 17.50.542. The only new requirement for Class IV landfill units is the deed notation requirement in New Rule XXIV. See Responses to Comment Nos. 34 and 35. The authority for the adoption of rules regulating Class IV landfill units is provided in 75-10-204, MCA. In response to this and other comments, the department is modifying the rules concerning a Class IV landfill unit to eliminate many prescriptive requirements and to instead adopt the performance standard in EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 257.3-4, that a landfill unit may not cause contamination in excess of the standards in Table 1 of New Rule XXXIII in an underground drinking water source. The reason for the deed notation requirement was stated in the statements of reasonable necessity for ARM 17.50.508 and New Rules XXIX and XXVIII(1)(f). See Response to Comment No. 72 concerning stringency. In response to the comment, the department has amended New Rule XXIX(2)(c) to provide that only the requirements in New Rule XVII, concerning explosive gases control, that are contained in EPA's regulation concerning Class IV landfill units are imposed on Class IV landfill units in Montana. Because the term "explosive gases" is used in New Rule XVII, and in 40 CFR 257.3-8, to set the basic 3-2/11/10 Montana Administrative Register
- Page 63 and 64: -311- In Montana, mortgage broker e
- Page 65 and 66: -313- (3) "Employed by" means: (a)
- Page 67 and 68: -315- BEFORE THE STATE AUDITOR AND
- Page 69 and 70: -317- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVI
- Page 71 and 72: -319- by the department. The applic
- Page 73 and 74: -321- NEW RULE VII (17.50.1006) FAU
- Page 75 and 76: -323- that land. The notation must,
- Page 77 and 78: -325- (c) the volume and physical a
- Page 79 and 80: -327- (2) Ground water monitoring r
- Page 81 and 82: -329- another alternative for analy
- Page 83 and 84: -331- 2 Chemical Abstract Service r
- Page 85 and 86: -333- ether; DCIP, See footnote 4 B
- Page 87 and 88: -335- Ethyldidene chloride 1,2-Dich
- Page 89 and 90: -337- Ethyl methacrylate 97-63-2 2-
- Page 91 and 92: -339- o-Nitrophenol; 2-Nitrophenol
- Page 93 and 94: -341- Vanadium (Total) Vanadium Vin
- Page 95 and 96: -343- protect human health or the e
- Page 97 and 98: -345- "existing" unit, "new" unit,
- Page 99 and 100: -347- should be rewritten to repres
- Page 101 and 102: -349- units are not existing units,
- Page 103 and 104: -351- wastes based on their environ
- Page 105 and 106: -353- RESPONSE: The application fee
- Page 107 and 108: -355- 40 CFR 257.9, which applies t
- Page 109 and 110: -357- NEW RULE XIII COMMENT NO. 31:
- Page 111 and 112: -359- COMMENT NO. 35: A commentor s
- Page 113: -361- recycling, or solid waste tre
- Page 117 and 118: -365- regulations and should be del
- Page 119 and 120: -367- has revised New Rule XXXIII t
- Page 121 and 122: -369- XXXVII(2), which contains the
- Page 123 and 124: -371- Applied Research Foundation D
- Page 125 and 126: -373- COMMENT NO. 51: A commentor n
- Page 127 and 128: -375- Comment No. 6. The department
- Page 129 and 130: -377- the department to be necessar
- Page 131 and 132: -379- NEW RULE XLI COMMENT NO. 57:
- Page 133 and 134: -381- In 40 CFR 258.57 and 40 CFR 2
- Page 135 and 136: -383- pursuant to (3), that complia
- Page 137 and 138: -385- stricken, and the phrases use
- Page 139 and 140: -387- scientific studies. Sen. Keat
- Page 141 and 142: -389- found in the first paragraph
- Page 143 and 144: -391- licensee "review the operatio
- Page 145 and 146: -393- CFR 258.55(h) and (i) without
- Page 147 and 148: -395- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUST
- Page 149 and 150: -397- in accordance with 50-61-120
- Page 151 and 152: -399- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABO
- Page 153 and 154: -401- Worker in districts 1 and 3,
- Page 155 and 156: -403- Response 12: The department n
- Page 157 and 158: -405- /s/ MARK CADWALLADER Mark Cad
- Page 159 and 160: -407- Comments 3 through 16 pertain
- Page 161 and 162: -409- RESPONSE 11: The board apprec
- Page 163 and 164: -411- BEFORE THE BOARD OF DENTISTRY
-362-<br />
waste, which could result in odor and taste problems in drinking water. Water in<br />
wood waste could also result in accelerated decomposition and settling, which could<br />
harm <strong>the</strong> cover and render it ineffective to protect <strong>the</strong> public from sharp objects or<br />
habitat for disease vectors.<br />
Concerning New Rule XXVIII(1)(b), requiring placement <strong>of</strong> six inches <strong>of</strong> cover<br />
at least every three months, EPA regulations provide that, for protection from fires or<br />
disease vectors, <strong>the</strong> "periodic application <strong>of</strong> cover material" may be required. 40<br />
CFR 257.3-8(b). "Periodic application <strong>of</strong> cover material" is defined as <strong>the</strong><br />
"application and compaction <strong>of</strong> soil or o<strong>the</strong>r suitable material over disposed solid<br />
waste at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> each operating day or at such frequencies and in such a manner<br />
as to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> fire and to impede disease vectors' access to <strong>the</strong> waste." 40<br />
CFR 257.3-8(e)(6). Therefore, this requirement for <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> six inches <strong>of</strong><br />
an approved cover is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> federal requirement in 40 CFR 257.3-8, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> finding requirements <strong>of</strong> 75-10-107, MCA, are not triggered.<br />
However, based on <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> department's solid waste section<br />
supervisor in managing <strong>the</strong> program and inspecting solid waste landfill facilities over<br />
17 years, six inches <strong>of</strong> cover placed at least every three months is necessary to<br />
reduce <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> fire and to impair <strong>the</strong> disease vectors' access to <strong>the</strong> waste. In at<br />
least two Class III landfill units where at least six inches <strong>of</strong> cover have not been<br />
placed at least every three months, fires have occurred and large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
mosquitoes have been observed. This requirement has been shown to be<br />
achievable because it has been followed under <strong>the</strong> existing rules and has been<br />
shown to be good management practice for many years, and <strong>the</strong>re are no<br />
technological barriers to meeting this requirement.<br />
Because this requirement is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> EPA's regulation, <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />
additional cost. However, <strong>the</strong> estimated costs to <strong>the</strong> regulated community, for each<br />
<strong>of</strong> 33 Class III landfill facilities, would be $2,018/acre based on <strong>the</strong> $2.50/cubic yard<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> placement <strong>of</strong> 807 cubic yards <strong>of</strong> additional six-inch soil cover per acre <strong>of</strong><br />
open area. There would be four applications <strong>of</strong> cover per year for a total cost <strong>of</strong><br />
$8,072/acre.<br />
Concerning New Rule XXVIII(1)(d)(ii), pertaining to access, EPA prohibits<br />
uncontrolled public access that would subject people to health and safety hazards.<br />
40 CFR 257.3-8(d). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> restriction for this purpose is not more stringent<br />
than a comparable federal regulation. The new rule limits and controls access and<br />
prevents unauthorized vehicular traffic and illegal dumping <strong>of</strong> wastes by requiring<br />
artificial or natural barriers. There is no comparable federal regulation for Class III<br />
landfill units, so <strong>the</strong> findings requirements <strong>of</strong> 75-10-107, MCA, are not applicable. It<br />
is necessary to limit access by unauthorized people to prevent illegal dumping <strong>of</strong><br />
waste and to protect <strong>the</strong>m from injury from heavy equipment and sharp objects.<br />
See Response to Comment No. 72 concerning stringency.<br />
COMMENT NO. 40: A commentor stated that, in (1)(b), provision should be<br />
made concerning cover requirements for Class III landfills, such as <strong>the</strong> one owned<br />
by <strong>the</strong> commentor, that contain significant amounts <strong>of</strong> clean dirt, soil and ear<strong>the</strong>n<br />
materials, and no tires. The commentor suggested that a situation like this could be<br />
handled in <strong>the</strong> O & M plan on file with <strong>the</strong> landfill license, and that quarterly cover <strong>of</strong><br />
at least six inches is not necessary.<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register 3-2/11/10