29.01.2015 Views

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-353-<br />

RESPONSE: The application fee referenced in ARM 17.50.513(2) is<br />

provided in ARM 17.50.410, and was adopted under <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> 75-10-115,<br />

MCA. The revisions in (2) do not adopt a new fee, but require a new application to<br />

be submitted with <strong>the</strong> appropriate application fee as provided in ARM 17.50.410.<br />

See Response to Comment No. 19.<br />

COMMENT NO. 18: A commentor stated that <strong>the</strong> department was being<br />

arbitrary in ARM 17.50.513(2) by requiring a license applicant to pay a new<br />

application fee if it failed to respond to a department request for more information to<br />

complete an application within 90 days, and asked whe<strong>the</strong>r it is possible to ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />

requested information within that timeframe. For example, archaeological surveys<br />

are nearly impossible to conduct in <strong>the</strong> wintertime due to snow cover, and, during a<br />

snowy winter, it might not be possible to complete a field survey requested in<br />

November, within 90 days. The department may make demands that are<br />

impossible for an applicant to complete without large amounts <strong>of</strong> additional funding<br />

or without benefit <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r budget cycle. The sentence requiring <strong>the</strong> 90-day<br />

deadline and additional fee should be removed from <strong>the</strong> proposed rule.<br />

RESPONSE: The 90-day deadline in ARM 17.50.513(2) was not proposed to<br />

be revised. However, <strong>the</strong> department believes <strong>the</strong> 90-day time limit for receiving<br />

additional requested information is more than enough time to compile and submit<br />

<strong>the</strong> requested information.<br />

COMMENT NO. 19: A commentor questioned <strong>the</strong> justification for <strong>the</strong><br />

department requiring a new application fee if <strong>the</strong> applicant fails to provide additional<br />

information within 90 days after being requested to do so.<br />

RESPONSE: Existing ARM 17.50.513(1) requires an applicant, that has not<br />

responded to a department notice that a license application is incomplete, to submit<br />

a new application. Existing ARM 17.50.410(1)(a) requires an application fee with a<br />

license application, and provides that <strong>the</strong> department shall send <strong>the</strong> applicant an<br />

invoice for <strong>the</strong> fee and begin processing <strong>the</strong> application upon receipt <strong>of</strong> that fee.<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> a new application fee, when a new application is<br />

submitted, is not new. The department believes that submittal <strong>of</strong> a new application<br />

fee for a new application, when requested additional information is not received<br />

within 90 days after <strong>the</strong> applicant has been notified, is necessary to cover <strong>the</strong><br />

department's costs for processing <strong>the</strong> application. It can take significant time for <strong>the</strong><br />

department's staff to re-review <strong>the</strong> application, become familiar with it, and prepare<br />

to analyze it after 90 days have passed. This is time that cannot be used on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

projects and constitutes a drain on <strong>the</strong> department's resources.<br />

NEW RULE I<br />

COMMENT NO: 20: A commentor questioned use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word "that" in <strong>the</strong><br />

phrase "a new Class II landfill unit, existing Class II landfill unit, or lateral expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> that unit" in New Rule I(1) and (2), and in similar phrases, such as "a new or<br />

existing Class II or Class IV landfill unit, or a lateral expansion <strong>of</strong> that unit," in New<br />

Rule V(1) and (2) and in o<strong>the</strong>r rules. The commentor stated that use <strong>of</strong> "that" was<br />

3-2/11/10 <strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!