Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Issue 3 - the Montana Secretary of State Website
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
-353-<br />
RESPONSE: The application fee referenced in ARM 17.50.513(2) is<br />
provided in ARM 17.50.410, and was adopted under <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> 75-10-115,<br />
MCA. The revisions in (2) do not adopt a new fee, but require a new application to<br />
be submitted with <strong>the</strong> appropriate application fee as provided in ARM 17.50.410.<br />
See Response to Comment No. 19.<br />
COMMENT NO. 18: A commentor stated that <strong>the</strong> department was being<br />
arbitrary in ARM 17.50.513(2) by requiring a license applicant to pay a new<br />
application fee if it failed to respond to a department request for more information to<br />
complete an application within 90 days, and asked whe<strong>the</strong>r it is possible to ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />
requested information within that timeframe. For example, archaeological surveys<br />
are nearly impossible to conduct in <strong>the</strong> wintertime due to snow cover, and, during a<br />
snowy winter, it might not be possible to complete a field survey requested in<br />
November, within 90 days. The department may make demands that are<br />
impossible for an applicant to complete without large amounts <strong>of</strong> additional funding<br />
or without benefit <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r budget cycle. The sentence requiring <strong>the</strong> 90-day<br />
deadline and additional fee should be removed from <strong>the</strong> proposed rule.<br />
RESPONSE: The 90-day deadline in ARM 17.50.513(2) was not proposed to<br />
be revised. However, <strong>the</strong> department believes <strong>the</strong> 90-day time limit for receiving<br />
additional requested information is more than enough time to compile and submit<br />
<strong>the</strong> requested information.<br />
COMMENT NO. 19: A commentor questioned <strong>the</strong> justification for <strong>the</strong><br />
department requiring a new application fee if <strong>the</strong> applicant fails to provide additional<br />
information within 90 days after being requested to do so.<br />
RESPONSE: Existing ARM 17.50.513(1) requires an applicant, that has not<br />
responded to a department notice that a license application is incomplete, to submit<br />
a new application. Existing ARM 17.50.410(1)(a) requires an application fee with a<br />
license application, and provides that <strong>the</strong> department shall send <strong>the</strong> applicant an<br />
invoice for <strong>the</strong> fee and begin processing <strong>the</strong> application upon receipt <strong>of</strong> that fee.<br />
Therefore, <strong>the</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> a new application fee, when a new application is<br />
submitted, is not new. The department believes that submittal <strong>of</strong> a new application<br />
fee for a new application, when requested additional information is not received<br />
within 90 days after <strong>the</strong> applicant has been notified, is necessary to cover <strong>the</strong><br />
department's costs for processing <strong>the</strong> application. It can take significant time for <strong>the</strong><br />
department's staff to re-review <strong>the</strong> application, become familiar with it, and prepare<br />
to analyze it after 90 days have passed. This is time that cannot be used on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
projects and constitutes a drain on <strong>the</strong> department's resources.<br />
NEW RULE I<br />
COMMENT NO: 20: A commentor questioned use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word "that" in <strong>the</strong><br />
phrase "a new Class II landfill unit, existing Class II landfill unit, or lateral expansion<br />
<strong>of</strong> that unit" in New Rule I(1) and (2), and in similar phrases, such as "a new or<br />
existing Class II or Class IV landfill unit, or a lateral expansion <strong>of</strong> that unit," in New<br />
Rule V(1) and (2) and in o<strong>the</strong>r rules. The commentor stated that use <strong>of</strong> "that" was<br />
3-2/11/10 <strong>Montana</strong> Administrative Register