29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />

Type yellow with white punctations, with 96 setigers.<br />

Antennae with up to 12 long articulations in A-III. A-I to<br />

posterior peristomial ring; A-II to setiger 3; A-III to setiger 5.<br />

Branchiae from setiger 3 through setiger 27; all pectinate<br />

with up to 9 filaments.<br />

Notopodial cirri about as long as branchiae, vaguely<br />

articulated.<br />

Aciculae yellow.<br />

The branchial distribution combined with <strong>the</strong> information<br />

about <strong>the</strong> antennae and <strong>the</strong> color <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aciculae indicate that<br />

this species might be a member <strong>of</strong> C-l, but <strong>the</strong> information is<br />

clearly insufficient to identify <strong>the</strong> species and it is here<br />

considered indeterminable.<br />

30. <strong>Eunice</strong> bipapillata Grube, 1866<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> bipapillata Grube, 1866a:64.<br />

FIGURE 23; TABLES 27,30, 31<br />

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Part <strong>of</strong> holotype, ZMB F 1993b<br />

(marked <strong>Eunice</strong> magnified, see comment below), Samoa, 3<br />

parapodia.<br />

COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—G. Hartwich (in<br />

litt.) informed me that parapodial preparations <strong>of</strong> E. bipapillata<br />

and E. magnifica originally were stored toge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

vial; at one time <strong>the</strong>y were split apart into two vials. The three<br />

parapodia referred to above agree with E. bipapillata and<br />

cannot agree with E. magnifica due to differences in <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> branchiae and <strong>the</strong> different maximal numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

branchial filaments reported by Grube for <strong>the</strong> two species.<br />

Therefore, it is assumed that <strong>the</strong> labels for <strong>the</strong> two vials were<br />

confused. The description given below is a summary <strong>of</strong><br />

observations on <strong>the</strong> parapodial preparations and <strong>the</strong> original<br />

description.<br />

DESCRIPTION.—Type copper-colored with white band across<br />

setiger 4.<br />

Ceratostyles articulated.<br />

Branchiae (Figure 23d,h,i) present, pectinate, distinctly<br />

shorter than notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region.<br />

Branchiae from setiger 4 to end <strong>of</strong> body. Branchiae present to<br />

near posterior end, present on more than 65% <strong>of</strong> total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> setigers. Up to 4 filaments from setiger 8 through setiger 18;<br />

paired filaments in setiger 77. Branchial stems short, tapering.<br />

Filaments digiuform.<br />

Anterior acicular lobes (Figure 23d,e) asymmetrically<br />

truncate, with aciculae emerging above midline, becoming<br />

slightly triangular in posterior setigers (Figure 23i). All<br />

pre- and postsetal lobes low folds. Ventral cirri distinctly<br />

inflated basally in setigers 15 and 18; inflated base lost by<br />

setiger 77; narrow tip digitiform in all setigers. Ventral cirrus in<br />

setiger 77 digitiform. All notopodial cirri similar in size and<br />

shape; bases slightly inflated, tapering to blunt, digiuform tips,<br />

without articulations.<br />

Limbate setae longer than o<strong>the</strong>r setae, slender, narrowly<br />

limbate, marginally serrated. Shafts <strong>of</strong> pectinate setae (Figure<br />

23b,h) cylindrical, slender; blades slightly flared, flat. One<br />

marginal tooth longer than o<strong>the</strong>r teeth; up to 15 teeth. Shafts <strong>of</strong><br />

compound falcigers (Figure 23a,c) tapering, marginally<br />

smooth; distal beak indistinct. Appendages short, relatively<br />

thickset with large heads, bidentate. Proximal teeth triangular,<br />

directed laterally or slightly distally, with distinct distal<br />

upturned tip; distal teeth longer than proximal teeth, tapering or<br />

blunt, directed obliquely distally. Guards asymmetrically<br />

bluntly pointed, without mucros. Pseudocompound falcigers<br />

and compound spinigcrs absent. Aciculae paired, black,<br />

tapering, straight, blunt-tipped; cross-section round. Subacicular<br />

hooks (Figure 230 black, bidentate. Hooks absent in<br />

parapodia 15 and 17, present in parapodium 77. Proximal tooth<br />

thicker than distal tooth, but no longer, curved, directed<br />

laterally. Distal tooth nearly erect, tapering. Guard short,<br />

truncate.<br />

UKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—All features associated<br />

with prostomium and pcrisiomium; jaw structure;<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> branchiae and subacicular hooks.<br />

EXPECTED STATES OF UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEA-<br />

TURES.—Antennae not reaching beyond pcristomium; with<br />

cylindrical articulations or without articulations; digitiform.<br />

Mx III short; located in front <strong>of</strong> left Mx IV, forming part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

distal arc. Branchiae continued to far posterior setigers.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 56, 58, 59. Unknown<br />

Characters: 1-20, 22-29, 33, 34, 36-40, 51, 52, 74, 78,<br />

80-82.<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—20,3;<br />

22,2; 23,4; 33,2; 37,1; 38,1.<br />

REMARKS.—<strong>Eunice</strong> bipapillata is listed with similar species<br />

in Tables 27, 30, and 31; it resembles in certain respects E.<br />

aphroditois, but cannot be completely identified without access<br />

to more material.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> bitorquata Grube, 1870<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> bitorquata Grube, 1870b:56.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> siciliensis.—Grube, 1878a: 101.<br />

REMARKS.—The original description contains <strong>the</strong> following<br />

statements (K. Fauchald translation):<br />

The species is brown with golden to brown cross bars on <strong>the</strong> peristomium.<br />

Branchiae are present from setiger 104 and are present only as single filaments,<br />

far outreaching <strong>the</strong> notopodial cirri. Segments are remarkably short and <strong>the</strong><br />

median antenna is as long as four segments. The maxillae have coarse teeth; Mx<br />

II has 4 teeth.<br />

Grube (1878a: 101) referred this species questionably to his<br />

own <strong>Eunice</strong> siciliensis, but gave no comment or any supportive<br />

statements.<br />

The original description is wholly inadequate to characterize<br />

<strong>the</strong> species; <strong>the</strong> information given is consistent with <strong>the</strong><br />

synonymy suggested by Grube (1878a), but is not sufficient to<br />

be conclusive. <strong>Eunice</strong> bitorquata is here considered indeterminable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!