A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
62 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />
sexual dimorphism. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two specimens is <strong>of</strong> indeterminate<br />
sex; <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group that<br />
sexual dimorphism is present and <strong>the</strong> two specimens differ in<br />
most features used to characterize separate species. They are, as<br />
indicated above, considered as such here.<br />
14. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois (Pallas, 1788)<br />
FIGURE 13a-d; TABLES 27,28<br />
Nereis aphroditois Pallas, 1788:229-230, pi. 5: figs. 1-7.<br />
<strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois.—Cuvier, 1817:525.—Ehlers. 1868:306-310, pi. 15: figs.<br />
23-29.—Fauvel, 1917:215-220, fig. 18 [in part], pi. 7.<br />
Leodice gigantea Lamarck, 1818:322.—Savigny, 1820:49-50.<br />
MATERIAL EXAMINED.—MNHN, Paris, La Reunion, Indian<br />
Ocean, coll. M. Carriere, 1910.<br />
COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—The type material is<br />
lost; it came from Sri Lanka; <strong>the</strong> specimen here described<br />
matches <strong>the</strong> original description closely.<br />
DESCRIPTION.—Specimen posteriorly incomplete, <strong>of</strong> unknown<br />
sex; with 529 setigers; total length 800 mm; maximal<br />
width 22 mm at setiger 25; length through setigcr 10, 55 mm.<br />
Body cylindrical anteriorly, becoming dorsoventrally flattened<br />
by setiger 200, but retaining about same width through setiger<br />
400, tapering from setiger 400 setiger to -10 mm in width at<br />
incomplete posterior end.<br />
Prostomium very short, distinctly narrower than peristomium,<br />
withdrawn inside nuchal fold, less than x /i as deep as<br />
peristomium. Prostomial lobes frontally rounded, dorsally<br />
inflated; median sulcus shallow. Eyes not observed. Antennae<br />
arranged in a horseshoe, evenly spaced, similar in thickness.<br />
Ceratophores ring-shaped in all antennae, without articulations.<br />
Ceratostyles thick, digitiform, tapering slightly, without articulations.<br />
Antennae to middle <strong>of</strong> peristomium; right A-II longest,<br />
to middle <strong>of</strong> posterior peristomial ring. Peristomium massive,<br />
cylindrical, about twice as wide as prostomium. Separation<br />
between rings distinct dorsally and ventrally; anterior ring 4 /5 <strong>of</strong><br />
total peristomial length. Peristomial cirri to middle <strong>of</strong> first<br />
peristomial ring, thick, slightly inflated basally, without<br />
articulations.<br />
Jaws not examined.<br />
Branchiae (Figure 13c,d) present, pectinate, distinctly longer<br />
than notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region, erect.<br />
Branchiae from setiger 6 to end <strong>of</strong> fragment. All branchiae<br />
pectinate; maximum -30 filaments in setigers 30-100. Stems<br />
thick, erect, tapering, longer than notopodial cirri through<br />
setiger 250. Filaments slender, filiform, shorter than notopodial<br />
cirri.<br />
Anterior neuropodial acicular lobes truncate to rounded,<br />
becoming triangular or slightly conical in far posterior setigers;<br />
aciculae emerging at midline. Presetal lobes low, transverse<br />
folds. Postsetal lobes forming a collar around acicular lobes,<br />
about as high as acicular lobes in anterior and median setigers,<br />
projecting beyond acicular lobes in posterior setigers. Anterior<br />
ventral cirri thick, tapering from wide, triangular bases, not<br />
obviously inflated through setiger 250. Ventral cirri basally<br />
inflated in posterior half <strong>of</strong> fragment. Median and posterior<br />
bases first scoop-shaped, becoming triangular welts in last<br />
setigers present, retaining short, tapering tips in all setigers.<br />
Anterior notopodial cirri basally inflated, tapering to thick lips,<br />
becoming very large and very strongly inflated in posterior<br />
setigers (Figure 13c), by far dominant parapodial structures in<br />
far posterior setigers. All notopodial cirri without articulations.<br />
Limbatc setae longer than o<strong>the</strong>r setae, slender, marginally<br />
finely frayed. Pectinate setae (Figure 13a) in thick fascicles,<br />
slender; shafts flattened. Blades tapering, gently furled.<br />
Marginal teeth no longer than o<strong>the</strong>r teeth, with -15 teeth. Shafts<br />
<strong>of</strong> compound hooks about as thick as aciculac and subacicular<br />
hooks, tapering, marginally smooth; beak indistinct, brasscolored.<br />
Appendages not seen. Aciculac paired, with dark<br />
brown, rarely black cores and clear sheaths, slender, tapering,<br />
distally pointed, usually bent dorsally at tip; cross-section<br />
round. Subacicular hooks (Figure 13b) with medium to dark<br />
brown cores and clear sheaths, bidentatc. Hooks first present<br />
from setigcr 200, <strong>the</strong>reafter missing in many setigers, always<br />
single (except for replacements). Hooks tapering to very<br />
slender, indistinct heads. Proximal teeth larger than distal teeth;<br />
both directed distally; both teeth indistinct.<br />
UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Features associated<br />
with far posterior setigers, pygidium, and anal cirri; jaw<br />
structure.<br />
EXPECTED STATE OF SELECTED UNKNOWN FEATURES.—Mx<br />
III and IV forming distal arc; Mx VI missing.<br />
CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />
SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 56, 60. Unknown<br />
Characters: 1, 2, 6, 13, 14, 36-38, 40, 57-59, 69, 70.<br />
ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—37,1;<br />
38,1; 57,1; 58,2; 59,2; 69,1; 70,2.<br />
REMARKS.—The synonymy <strong>of</strong> this species was discussed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> introduction. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois has been widely reported<br />
and a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r named taxa has been synonymized with<br />
this species. The specimen described above agrees well with<br />
current definitions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species; however, <strong>the</strong> description<br />
represents a restriction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> this species compared<br />
to <strong>the</strong> definition given by Fauvel (1917:215); <strong>the</strong> species is<br />
listed with similar species in Tables 27 and 28.<br />
A series <strong>of</strong> species lacking articulations in <strong>the</strong> ceratostyles is<br />
listed in Table 28; several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are known to have simple<br />
spine-like, relatively large subacicular hooks only; o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
species have relatively small, bidentate subacicular hooks.<br />
Included among <strong>the</strong> latter are, in addition to E. aphroditois. E.<br />
contingens, E. djiboutiensis, E. guttata, E. investigatoris, E.<br />
palauensis, E. polybranchia, E. roussaei, E. suviensis, and E.<br />
rullieri. <strong>Eunice</strong> sebastiani has been reported to have both<br />
simple falcate and bidentate subacicular hooks. Characteristic<br />
<strong>of</strong> E. aphroditois and related taxa are <strong>the</strong> large, medially<br />
inflated notopodial cirri; among <strong>the</strong> species listed above, such<br />
cirri are present in E. contingens, E. roussaei, and E. rullieri.<br />
<strong>Eunice</strong> djiboutiensis and E. sebastiani have basally inflated,<br />
basally distinctly pendulous, notopodial cirri. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphrodi-