29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />

sexual dimorphism. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two specimens is <strong>of</strong> indeterminate<br />

sex; <strong>the</strong>re is little evidence in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group that<br />

sexual dimorphism is present and <strong>the</strong> two specimens differ in<br />

most features used to characterize separate species. They are, as<br />

indicated above, considered as such here.<br />

14. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois (Pallas, 1788)<br />

FIGURE 13a-d; TABLES 27,28<br />

Nereis aphroditois Pallas, 1788:229-230, pi. 5: figs. 1-7.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois.—Cuvier, 1817:525.—Ehlers. 1868:306-310, pi. 15: figs.<br />

23-29.—Fauvel, 1917:215-220, fig. 18 [in part], pi. 7.<br />

Leodice gigantea Lamarck, 1818:322.—Savigny, 1820:49-50.<br />

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—MNHN, Paris, La Reunion, Indian<br />

Ocean, coll. M. Carriere, 1910.<br />

COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—The type material is<br />

lost; it came from Sri Lanka; <strong>the</strong> specimen here described<br />

matches <strong>the</strong> original description closely.<br />

DESCRIPTION.—Specimen posteriorly incomplete, <strong>of</strong> unknown<br />

sex; with 529 setigers; total length 800 mm; maximal<br />

width 22 mm at setiger 25; length through setigcr 10, 55 mm.<br />

Body cylindrical anteriorly, becoming dorsoventrally flattened<br />

by setiger 200, but retaining about same width through setiger<br />

400, tapering from setiger 400 setiger to -10 mm in width at<br />

incomplete posterior end.<br />

Prostomium very short, distinctly narrower than peristomium,<br />

withdrawn inside nuchal fold, less than x /i as deep as<br />

peristomium. Prostomial lobes frontally rounded, dorsally<br />

inflated; median sulcus shallow. Eyes not observed. Antennae<br />

arranged in a horseshoe, evenly spaced, similar in thickness.<br />

Ceratophores ring-shaped in all antennae, without articulations.<br />

Ceratostyles thick, digitiform, tapering slightly, without articulations.<br />

Antennae to middle <strong>of</strong> peristomium; right A-II longest,<br />

to middle <strong>of</strong> posterior peristomial ring. Peristomium massive,<br />

cylindrical, about twice as wide as prostomium. Separation<br />

between rings distinct dorsally and ventrally; anterior ring 4 /5 <strong>of</strong><br />

total peristomial length. Peristomial cirri to middle <strong>of</strong> first<br />

peristomial ring, thick, slightly inflated basally, without<br />

articulations.<br />

Jaws not examined.<br />

Branchiae (Figure 13c,d) present, pectinate, distinctly longer<br />

than notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region, erect.<br />

Branchiae from setiger 6 to end <strong>of</strong> fragment. All branchiae<br />

pectinate; maximum -30 filaments in setigers 30-100. Stems<br />

thick, erect, tapering, longer than notopodial cirri through<br />

setiger 250. Filaments slender, filiform, shorter than notopodial<br />

cirri.<br />

Anterior neuropodial acicular lobes truncate to rounded,<br />

becoming triangular or slightly conical in far posterior setigers;<br />

aciculae emerging at midline. Presetal lobes low, transverse<br />

folds. Postsetal lobes forming a collar around acicular lobes,<br />

about as high as acicular lobes in anterior and median setigers,<br />

projecting beyond acicular lobes in posterior setigers. Anterior<br />

ventral cirri thick, tapering from wide, triangular bases, not<br />

obviously inflated through setiger 250. Ventral cirri basally<br />

inflated in posterior half <strong>of</strong> fragment. Median and posterior<br />

bases first scoop-shaped, becoming triangular welts in last<br />

setigers present, retaining short, tapering tips in all setigers.<br />

Anterior notopodial cirri basally inflated, tapering to thick lips,<br />

becoming very large and very strongly inflated in posterior<br />

setigers (Figure 13c), by far dominant parapodial structures in<br />

far posterior setigers. All notopodial cirri without articulations.<br />

Limbatc setae longer than o<strong>the</strong>r setae, slender, marginally<br />

finely frayed. Pectinate setae (Figure 13a) in thick fascicles,<br />

slender; shafts flattened. Blades tapering, gently furled.<br />

Marginal teeth no longer than o<strong>the</strong>r teeth, with -15 teeth. Shafts<br />

<strong>of</strong> compound hooks about as thick as aciculac and subacicular<br />

hooks, tapering, marginally smooth; beak indistinct, brasscolored.<br />

Appendages not seen. Aciculac paired, with dark<br />

brown, rarely black cores and clear sheaths, slender, tapering,<br />

distally pointed, usually bent dorsally at tip; cross-section<br />

round. Subacicular hooks (Figure 13b) with medium to dark<br />

brown cores and clear sheaths, bidentatc. Hooks first present<br />

from setigcr 200, <strong>the</strong>reafter missing in many setigers, always<br />

single (except for replacements). Hooks tapering to very<br />

slender, indistinct heads. Proximal teeth larger than distal teeth;<br />

both directed distally; both teeth indistinct.<br />

UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Features associated<br />

with far posterior setigers, pygidium, and anal cirri; jaw<br />

structure.<br />

EXPECTED STATE OF SELECTED UNKNOWN FEATURES.—Mx<br />

III and IV forming distal arc; Mx VI missing.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 56, 60. Unknown<br />

Characters: 1, 2, 6, 13, 14, 36-38, 40, 57-59, 69, 70.<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—37,1;<br />

38,1; 57,1; 58,2; 59,2; 69,1; 70,2.<br />

REMARKS.—The synonymy <strong>of</strong> this species was discussed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> introduction. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphroditois has been widely reported<br />

and a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r named taxa has been synonymized with<br />

this species. The specimen described above agrees well with<br />

current definitions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species; however, <strong>the</strong> description<br />

represents a restriction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> this species compared<br />

to <strong>the</strong> definition given by Fauvel (1917:215); <strong>the</strong> species is<br />

listed with similar species in Tables 27 and 28.<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> species lacking articulations in <strong>the</strong> ceratostyles is<br />

listed in Table 28; several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are known to have simple<br />

spine-like, relatively large subacicular hooks only; o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species have relatively small, bidentate subacicular hooks.<br />

Included among <strong>the</strong> latter are, in addition to E. aphroditois. E.<br />

contingens, E. djiboutiensis, E. guttata, E. investigatoris, E.<br />

palauensis, E. polybranchia, E. roussaei, E. suviensis, and E.<br />

rullieri. <strong>Eunice</strong> sebastiani has been reported to have both<br />

simple falcate and bidentate subacicular hooks. Characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> E. aphroditois and related taxa are <strong>the</strong> large, medially<br />

inflated notopodial cirri; among <strong>the</strong> species listed above, such<br />

cirri are present in E. contingens, E. roussaei, and E. rullieri.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> djiboutiensis and E. sebastiani have basally inflated,<br />

basally distinctly pendulous, notopodial cirri. <strong>Eunice</strong> aphrodi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!