29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316<br />

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />

Kinberg (1865:562) gave <strong>the</strong> original locality as "Mare<br />

pacificum, long, orient. 107°10\ lat. austr. 2°30', in fundo 48<br />

orgyiarum. VERNGREN." Kinberg (1910) repeated <strong>the</strong> same<br />

information and <strong>the</strong> label in <strong>the</strong> vial is <strong>the</strong> same. Hartman<br />

(1948:76) indicates that specimens should have been found <strong>of</strong>f<br />

Clipperton Island in <strong>the</strong> Pacific Ocean, i.e., at 107° WEST ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than EAST. It is here assumed that label and Kinbcrg's<br />

information is correct and that <strong>the</strong> specimens were found in <strong>the</strong><br />

strait between Sumatra and Borneo.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tentaculata is listed with similar species in Tables 41<br />

and 42. The maximum number <strong>of</strong> branchial filaments indicated<br />

by Kinberg appears to be correct, but cannot be absolutely<br />

confirmed, due to <strong>the</strong> poor state <strong>of</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tentaculata has, at least in part, tridentate appendages in<br />

<strong>the</strong> compound falcigers; fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> guards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se setae<br />

are blunt, ra<strong>the</strong>r than mucronate. The relationship with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species with multiple subacicular hooks was discussed in <strong>the</strong><br />

remarks on E. indica.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tentaculata Quatrefages, 1866<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tentaculata Quatrefages, 1866:317-318.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> lat ice ps Ehlers, 1868:312.—Fauchald, 1986:251-252. figs. 46-50.<br />

REMARKS.—As detailed by Fauchald (1986) <strong>the</strong> valid name<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species is E. laticeps and it has been treated as such<br />

above.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tenuicirrata (Verrill, 1900)<br />

Leodice tenuicirrata Verrill, 1900:643-644.—Hartman, 1942:9.<br />

Leodice rtigma/wa.—Treadwell,1921:20-22, figs. 31-40, pi. 1: figs.10-13<br />

[not Leodice stigmatura Verrill, 1900].<br />

REMARKS.—The type is not present in <strong>the</strong> Peabody<br />

Museum, Yale University, and has been missing at least for 40<br />

years (Hartman, 1942; W. Hartman, in litt.). Treadwell did not<br />

justify referring this species to E. stigmatura and did not<br />

mention examining <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r species. There is<br />

insufficient information in <strong>the</strong> original description to allow any<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species; it is here considered indeterminable.<br />

187. <strong>Eunice</strong> tenuis (Treadwell, 1921)<br />

FIGURE 107e-h; TABLES 33,38<br />

Leodice tenuis Treadwell, 1921:51-52, figs. 154-163, pi. 4: fig. 11.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> tenuis.—Hartman, 1956:284.<br />

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Holotype, AMNH 1913-1271, Dry<br />

Tortugas, Florida.<br />

COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—The anterior end <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> holotype has been sliced <strong>of</strong>f frontally, so only a remnant <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> peristomial rings is present on <strong>the</strong> dorsal side. The specimen<br />

is complete ventrally only from setiger 5-6; thus no<br />

illustrations could be made <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anterior end.<br />

DESCRIPTION.—Holotype complete with 695 setigers; total<br />

length 460 mm; maximal width 2 mm; length through setiger<br />

10, -4.5 mm.<br />

Prostomium according to Treadwell (1921:51) conspicuously<br />

bilobed. Ceratophores ring-shaped in all antennae,<br />

without articulations. Ccratostylcs slender and digitiform,<br />

without articulations. Outreaching prostomium, with A-III<br />

longest. Peristomial rings distinct on all sides; relauve length <strong>of</strong><br />

rings indeterminable. Pcristomial cirri short, ovate, without<br />

articulations.<br />

Jaws missing; maxillary formula 1+1, 7+5, 7+0, 3+6, and<br />

1+1 (rewritten after statement in Treadwell, 1921:52).<br />

Branchiae (Figure 107e) present, palmate, distinctly longer<br />

than notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region.<br />

Branchiae from setiger 81 to posterior end. Branchiae present<br />

to near posterior end, present on more than 65% <strong>of</strong> total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> setigers. First 10 branchiae single filaments; number <strong>of</strong><br />

filaments increasing to 3 by setiger 150, finally to 4 by setiger<br />

400. Numbers <strong>of</strong> filaments decreasing to 3 in last 100<br />

segments; last few segments with reduced branchiae.<br />

All ncuropodial acicular lobes distally rounded; aciculae<br />

emerging at midlinc. AH prc- and postsctal lobes low,<br />

transverse folds. First 200 ventral cirri digitiform. Ventral cirri<br />

basally inflated in middle 200 segments. Inflated bases ovate;<br />

narrow tip tapering. Posterior ventral cirri short, nearly<br />

tubercular, without inflated bases. All notopodial cirri digitiform.<br />

Notopodial cirri without articulations.<br />

Limbate setae missing in scattered setigers, gently curved,<br />

marginally frayed. Pectinate setae (Figure 107g) long and<br />

prominent in posterior setigers, narrow, tapering, flat. Marginal<br />

teeth no longer than o<strong>the</strong>r teeth; less than 10 teeth present.<br />

Shafts <strong>of</strong> compound falcigers (Figure 1070 distally inflated,<br />

marginally serrated. Appendages short, stout, bidentate. Proximal<br />

teeth very much larger than distal teeth, tapering, directed<br />

laterally. Distal teeth tapering, sharply bent. Guards symmetrically<br />

rounded, marginally frayed; mucros absent. Pseudocompound<br />

falcigers and compound spinigers absent. Aciculae<br />

single, light amber-colored, tapering to blunt tips, straight;<br />

cross-sections round. Subacicular hooks (Figure 107h) light<br />

amber-colored, bidentate. Hooks first present from setiger 124,<br />

present in all setigers <strong>the</strong>reafter, paired in most setigers.<br />

Proximal teeth very much larger than distal teeth, directed<br />

laterally. Distal teeth directed distally.<br />

UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Relationship between<br />

Mx III and left Mx IV; pygidium and anal cirri.<br />

EXPECTED STATES OF UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEA-<br />

TURES.—Mx III short; forming part <strong>of</strong> distal arc with left Mx<br />

IV.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 22, 34, 56, 58, 59.<br />

Unknown Characters: 4, 6-8, 10-17, 24, 26, 40, 74, 78.<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—<br />

None.<br />

REMARKS.—<strong>Eunice</strong> tenuis was compared to E. cariboea by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!