A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
264 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />
Three species <strong>of</strong> <strong>Eunice</strong> arc associated with ahermatypic<br />
coral reefs <strong>of</strong>f Norway; all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are present on <strong>the</strong> reef at<br />
Storskjaer in <strong>the</strong> Osl<strong>of</strong>jord (Inger Winsnes, pers. comm.). These<br />
species are readily identified: one has branchiae along most <strong>of</strong><br />
body and black subacicular hooks (£. norvegicd); <strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
species have branchiae limited to a short anterior region. The<br />
two latter species are separable on a variety <strong>of</strong> features, but<br />
perhaps most easily on <strong>the</strong> fact that one has yellow (£.<br />
pennata), <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r dark brown or black subacicular hooks and<br />
aciculae (£. dubitata).<br />
Some confusion has arisen as to <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> £. pennata as<br />
opposed to E. pinnata. Traditionally, E. pennata has been<br />
assigned to a species in group A-l sensu Fauchald (1970).<br />
Nothing in Miiller's description contradicts this tradition; for<br />
that reason, this tradition is here accepted. Nereis pinnata (=<br />
<strong>Eunice</strong> pinnata auctores) is treated below.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> first described species in group A-l, E. pennata has<br />
been widely reported and appeared at one time to have a bipolar<br />
distribution. Records <strong>of</strong> this species from <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
hemisphere (cf. Hartman, 1964:118, 1967:99) have yet to be<br />
confirmed.<br />
Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most unique feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species is <strong>the</strong> presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> ring-shaped bases in posterior notopodia; this is a feature<br />
that has been reported from only one o<strong>the</strong>r species <strong>of</strong> <strong>Eunice</strong> (£.<br />
nicidi<strong>of</strong>ormis); it resembles <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notopodia<br />
among onuphids more than in <strong>the</strong> eunicids.<br />
<strong>Eunice</strong> pennata is listed with similar species in Tables 19<br />
and 20. Of species listed in Table 20, <strong>the</strong> following have<br />
branchiae starting on setiger 3: E. biannulata, E. caeca, E.<br />
kobiensis, E. mexicana, E. pennata, E. segregata, E. valens,<br />
and E. websteri; <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species have branchiae first present<br />
from setiger 4 or later. Of <strong>the</strong> species listed, E. caeca has as<br />
many as 24 branchial filaments where <strong>the</strong> branchiae are best<br />
developed; E. mexicana has 18 filaments; E. biannulata and E.<br />
kobiensis have 8 filaments; <strong>the</strong> remaining species have 11-15<br />
filaments where <strong>the</strong> branchiae are best developed. <strong>Eunice</strong><br />
pennata and E. websteri have distally moniliform or dropshaped<br />
articulations in <strong>the</strong> ceratostyles; E. segregata and E.<br />
valens have cylindrical articulations. In E. pennata <strong>the</strong> first five<br />
branchiae are single filaments; in £. websteri only one anterior<br />
segment has single filaments. In contrast, at <strong>the</strong> posterior end <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> branchiated region, £. pennata has two segments with<br />
single filaments; £. websteri has 10 segments. Note that £.<br />
pennata is <strong>the</strong> only species in Table 20 with distinct<br />
ring-shaped notopodial bases in posterior notopodia.<br />
154. <strong>Eunice</strong> perimensis Gravier, 1900<br />
FIGURE 88a-c; TABLES 33, 39<br />
<strong>Eunice</strong> perimensis Gravier, 1900:239-242, figs. 94-99, pi. 12: figs. 61, 62.<br />
MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Holotype, MNHN, Paris, Red Sea,<br />
Par, Perimen, 1894, coll. J. Jousseaume.<br />
COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—The anterior end<br />
was been compressed dorsoventrally to evert pharynx during<br />
fixation and is distorted as illustrated.<br />
DESCRIPTION.—Holotype incomplete with 79 setigers;<br />
length 50 mm; maximal width 5 mm at setiger 70; length<br />
through setiger 10, 10 mm. Anterior part <strong>of</strong> body cylindrical;<br />
becoming strongly dorsoventrally flattened by setiger 10;<br />
segments short; crowded.<br />
Prostomium (Figure 88a) distinctly shorter and narrower<br />
than peristomium, less than V2 as deep as peristomium.<br />
Prostomial lobes frontally truncate, dorsally somewhat flattened;<br />
median sulcus deep. Eyes between bases <strong>of</strong> A-I and A-II.<br />
Antennae in a horseshoe, evenly spaced, similar in thickness.<br />
Ceratophores ring-shaped in all antennae, without articulations.<br />
Ceratostyles slender and tapering, without articulations. No<br />
antennae reaching beyond anterior pcristomial ring; A-I<br />
shortest; A-I 11 longest. Peristomium cylindrical. Separation<br />
between rings distinct dorsally and ventrally; anterior ring -2/$<br />
<strong>of</strong> total pcristomial length, possibly distorted. Pcristomial cirri<br />
to middle <strong>of</strong> anterior pcristomial ring, without articulations.<br />
Maxillary formula 1 + 1,4+4,7+0,4+7, 1 + 1. Left Mx IV very<br />
small; part <strong>of</strong> distal arc with Mx 111 and left Mx V. Jaws heavily<br />
calcified.<br />
Branchiae (Figure 88b) present, pectinate, distinctly longer<br />
than notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region, flexible.<br />
Branchiae present from setiger 17 to end <strong>of</strong> fragment. All but<br />
first branchia with 2 or more filaments; maximum 8 filaments<br />
from about setiger 30 to end. Branchial stems slender, tapering<br />
and flexible. Filaments distinctly longer than notopodial cirri<br />
except in first branchial segments.<br />
Neuropodial acicular lobes distally truncate to rounded;<br />
aciculae emerging at midline. Pre- and postsetal lobes low,<br />
transverse folds. First 9 ventral cirri tapering. Ventral cirri<br />
distinctly basally inflated by setiger 10. Inflated bases<br />
moderate, ovate; narrow tips tapering. Ventral cirri remaining<br />
basally inflated through rest <strong>of</strong> fragment. Notopodial cirri<br />
supported by internal aciculae. Prebranchial notopodial cirri<br />
long, digitiform, not increasing in length through prebranchial<br />
region, becoming slightly medially inflated in last prebranchial<br />
segments, becoming reduced in length in branchial region,<br />
without articulations.<br />
Limbate setae slender, distinctly frayed. Shafts <strong>of</strong> pectinate<br />
setae (Figure 88c) slender, blades slightly furled, flared. One<br />
marginal tooth longer than all o<strong>the</strong>r teeth; -20 teeth present.<br />
Posterior fascicles with up to 10 pectinate setae each. Shafts <strong>of</strong><br />
compound falcigers (Figure 88d) distally inflated, with distinct<br />
peak, marginally smooth. Appendages short with very large<br />
distinct heads, bidentate. Proximal teeth slightly longer than<br />
distal teeth, triangular, directed slightly basally. Distal teeth<br />
curved. Guards symmetrically rounded, marginally smooth;<br />
mucros absent. Pseudocompound falcigers and compound<br />
spinigers absent. Aciculae usually single, sometimes paired,<br />
light to dark brown, thick, tapering, straight, projecting well<br />
beyond tip <strong>of</strong> parapodia in posterior setigers; cross-section<br />
round. Separation <strong>of</strong> cores and sheaths indistinct in both