29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />

thick; tapering, becoming basally inflated from about setiger<br />

12; inflated bases retained to about setiger 100. Inflated bases<br />

long transverse welts; narrow tips tapering. Posterior ventral<br />

cirri tapering. Anterior notopodial cirri distinctly medially<br />

inflated, becoming short and strongly tapering from about<br />

setiger 75, without articulations.<br />

Limbate setae slender, marginally serrated. Pectinate setae<br />

(Figure 691) large, flaring, flat. Both marginal teeth longer than<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r teeth; -20 teeth present Shafts <strong>of</strong> compound falcigers<br />

(Figure 69i) distinctly inflated, marginally serrated. Appendages<br />

slender, narrow, with nearly parallel sides, bidentate.<br />

Proximal and distal teeth similar in size. Proximal teeth<br />

tapering, directed laterally. Distal teeth curved. Guards symmetrically<br />

rounded; mucros absent. Pseudocompound falcigers<br />

and compound spinigers absent. Aciculae (Figure 69k) dark<br />

brown, tapering to blunt, distally rounded tips, straight;<br />

cross-sections round. Subacicular hooks (Figure 69j) dark<br />

brown, unidentate. Hooks first present from setiger 38, present<br />

in all setigers <strong>the</strong>reafter, always single (except for replacements).<br />

Tips more or less gently curved, slightly asymmetrical<br />

in some setigers, but no trace <strong>of</strong> secondary teeth seen.<br />

Notopodial aciculae light brown.<br />

UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Features associated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> far posterior end.<br />

EXPECTED STATES OF UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEA-<br />

TURES.—None.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 22, 33, 34, 39, 40,42,<br />

56, 58, 59. Unknown Characters: 1,2,4, 6, 36-38,64, 78.<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—37,1;<br />

38,1.<br />

REMARKS.—<strong>Eunice</strong> marenzelleri is listed with similar<br />

species in Tables 33 and 37. It is <strong>the</strong> only species in Table 37<br />

with simple, spine-like subacicular hooks. It is listed with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species with simple spine-like subacicular hooks in Table 50. It<br />

is <strong>the</strong> only species in Table 50 with exclusively single branchial<br />

filaments.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> margaritacea Williams, 1853<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> margaritacea Williams, 1853:408, fig. 4.<br />

REMARKS.—The article in which this species was named<br />

concerns mechanisms <strong>of</strong> aquatic respiration in invertebrates.<br />

The species name is mentioned in <strong>the</strong> caption to an illustration<br />

showing <strong>the</strong> pectinate branchial structure <strong>of</strong> a eunicid. The<br />

discussion in <strong>the</strong> text gives no additional information about <strong>the</strong><br />

species, o<strong>the</strong>r than indicating that it presumably was found in<br />

Great Britain, nor is <strong>the</strong> disposition <strong>of</strong> any material mentioned.<br />

The species is indeterminable; <strong>the</strong> name is here considered a<br />

nomen nudum, making <strong>the</strong> combination available.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> margaritacea (Verrill, 1900)<br />

Leodice margaritacea Verrill, 1900:644-645.<br />

Leodice longicirrata.—Treadwell, 1921:11-14, figs. 3-12, pi. 1: figs. 1-4<br />

[not Nicidion longicirrata Kinberg, 1865).<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> longicirrata.—Hartman, 1942:9 (in part, not Nicidion longicirrata<br />

Kinberg. 1865].<br />

REMARKS.—The types <strong>of</strong> this species are no longer available<br />

in <strong>the</strong> collections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Peabody Museum (W. Hartman, in<br />

litt.). It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r Hartman (1942:9) saw any<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> this species when she examined <strong>the</strong> type<br />

collections <strong>of</strong> that museum. She referred to TrcadweH's<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species. Treadwell (1921:11-14) clearly did<br />

not see Verrill's types; on page 14 he stated: "From comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> his descriptions with specimens <strong>of</strong> longicirrata collected by<br />

myself in Bermuda, in <strong>the</strong> locality where [Verrill] records<br />

margaritacea as abundant, I am convinced that [elegans and<br />

margaritacea] are identical with longicirrata." I am inclined to<br />

believe that <strong>the</strong> spccimcn(s) on which Vcrril! based his species<br />

were missing already by 1920.<br />

The only descriptive detail available, namely that branchiae<br />

arc present from setigers 3-4 and end at sctigcrs 45-50 with up<br />

to 5 branchial filaments, is consistent with TrcadweH's<br />

conclusion and with Webster's species, also originally described<br />

from Bermuda. Webster's name is preoccupied and his<br />

species was renamed <strong>Eunice</strong> websteri by Fauchald (1969). The<br />

synonymy proposed by Treadwell is here accepted. VerriH's<br />

name is valid because <strong>the</strong> previously published combination<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> margaritacea Williams (1853) is a nomen nudum (see<br />

above).<br />

116. <strong>Eunice</strong> margariticacea Fischli, 1900<br />

TABLES 46,47<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> margariticacea Fischli. 1900:104-106. pi. 4: figs. 8, 9. pi. 6: figs. 35,<br />

36, pi. 7: figs. 55-58.<br />

COMMENTS ON MATERIAL EXAMINED.—The types, from<br />

Temate in <strong>the</strong> Moluccas, are not available. Fischli's description<br />

and illustrations are quite detailed; <strong>the</strong> following summary <strong>of</strong><br />

his findings updates his terminology.<br />

DESCRIPTION.—Medium-size specimen with 95 segments;<br />

length 14 mm. Ceratostyles with up to 30 moniliform<br />

articulations in A-III. A-III to setiger 7. Peristomium cylindrical.<br />

Separation between peristomial rings distinct on all sides.<br />

Peristomial cirri to posterior edge <strong>of</strong> prostomium, with up to 7<br />

articulations.<br />

Maxillary formula 1+1, 5+5, 7+0, 5+7, and presumably 1+1.<br />

Mx III long, located behind left Mx II.<br />

Branchiae present, pectinate, reduced in mid-body region,<br />

erect. Branchiae from setiger 6 to setiger 95. Branchiae present<br />

to near posterior end, present on more than 65% <strong>of</strong> total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> setigers. Maximum 5 filaments at about setiger 10.<br />

Mid-body setigers in 1 specimen with single filaments;<br />

posterior setiger with 2-3 filaments.<br />

Ventral cirri basally strongly inflated in median setigers, less<br />

distinctly inflated in far posterior setigers. Inflated bases nearly<br />

spherical. Notopodial cirri with up to 5-7 articulations, most<br />

distinct anteriorly, but present in all setigers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!