29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUMBER 523 167<br />

FIGURE 54.—<strong>Eunice</strong> harassii (MNHN, Paris, A.l(R.)-1868-no. 46a): a, anterior end, lateral view; b, subacicular<br />

hook, parapodium 46; c, compound falciger, parapodium 46; d, parapodium 46, anterior view. <strong>Eunice</strong> havaica<br />

(syntype, RM 430): e, appendage <strong>of</strong> compound falciger, median parapodium; f, compound falciger, median<br />

parapodium; g, subacicular hook, median parapodium; h, anterior end, lateral view. (Scale bars in mm.)<br />

straight; cross-sections round. Separation between core and<br />

sheath indistinct in both aciculae and subacicular hooks.<br />

Subacicular hooks (Figure 54b) light brown, bidentate. Hooks<br />

first present from setiger 28, present in all setigers <strong>the</strong>reafter,<br />

always single (except for replacements). Hooks with distinct<br />

neck. Proximal teeth large, curved, directed laterally. Distal<br />

teeth bluntly triangular, nearly erect.<br />

UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Pygidium<br />

anal cirri.<br />

EXPECTED STATES OF SELECTED UNKNOWN FEATURES —<br />

None.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 56, 58, 59. Unknown<br />

Characters: 1, 2, 36-38,40.<br />

and<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—37,1;<br />

38,1.<br />

REMARKS.—<strong>Eunice</strong> harassii was described from lies<br />

Chausey and St. Malo. Audouin and Milne Edwards<br />

(1833:215) mentioned that <strong>the</strong> species was relatively common<br />

in <strong>the</strong>se areas. Quatrefages (1866:309) mentioned that he<br />

described <strong>the</strong> species based on a specimen reported from lies<br />

Chausey by Audouin and Milne Edwards. The specimen<br />

described above appears to be <strong>the</strong> specimen used by Quatrefages<br />

(1866) in his review and thus potentially part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

original material. At <strong>the</strong> very least, <strong>the</strong> specimen comes from<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two type areas and may be part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type material.<br />

It is here considered an authoritative specimen, but not as a<br />

type.<br />

Heider (1925) gave an excellent description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anatomy<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anterior end <strong>of</strong> a species he called E. punctata (Risso,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!