29.01.2015 Views

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

A Review of the Genus Eunice - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY<br />

Prostomium (Figure 43o) ~ x ji as deep, very nearly as wide as<br />

peristomium. Prostomial lobes frontally rounded, dorsally<br />

flattened; median sulcus shallow. Eyes behind bases <strong>of</strong> A-I,<br />

dark. Antennae in a horseshoe; A-I and A-II emerging close<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r, near outer edges <strong>of</strong> prostomium, separated by gap<br />

from A-III, similar in thickness. Ceratophorcs ring-shaped in<br />

all antennae, without articulations. Ceratostyles slender and<br />

digitiform, with up to 14 closely spaced, indistinct articulations<br />

in A-III, articulated to bases <strong>of</strong> ceratostyles. A-I to posterior<br />

pcristomial ring; A-II and A-III to sctiger 2. Peristomium<br />

slightly flaring anteriorly. Separation between rings distinct<br />

dorsally and ventrally; anterior ring 3 A <strong>of</strong> total pcristomial<br />

length. Peristomial cirri to middle <strong>of</strong> anterior peristomial ring,<br />

slender and digitiform, without articulations.<br />

Jaws not examined.<br />

Branchiae (Figure 43n) present, palmate, about as long as<br />

notopodial cirri, not reduced in mid-body region. Branchiae<br />

from setiger 78-79 to end <strong>of</strong> fragments. Most branchiae with 2<br />

long, narrow filaments emerging from joint bases at dorsal edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> notopodial cirri; up to 3 filaments present. Stems reduced.<br />

Filaments longer than notopodial cirri.<br />

Neuropodial acicular lobes (Figure 43i) rounded; anterior<br />

setigers with small rounded tabs dorsal to emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

aciculae; tabs absent in posterior setigers; aciculae emerging at<br />

midline. Lateral body wall forming low ridges with acicular<br />

lobes at distal ends from about setiger 25. Pre- and postsetal<br />

lobes low folds; anterior presetal lobes distinctly lower than<br />

acicular lobes; in posterior setigers all 3 lobes paralleling each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r closely. First 4 ventral cirri thick and tapering. Ventral<br />

cirri basally inflated from about setiger 5. Inflated bases<br />

distinct, inflated ridges along ventral side <strong>of</strong> neuropodia in all<br />

later setigers; narrow tips tapering or digitiform. Anterior<br />

notopodial cirri tapering with 4 articulations; number <strong>of</strong><br />

articulations reduced to one in posterior setigers; notopodial<br />

cirri becoming digitiform in far posterior setigers.<br />

Limbate setae slender, very finely serrated. Pectinate setae<br />

(Figure 43m) very small, with slender shafts. Blades furled,<br />

flaring. Both marginal teeth longer than o<strong>the</strong>r teeth, with -12<br />

teeth. Shafts <strong>of</strong> compound falcigers distinctly inflated and<br />

marginally serrated; beaks distinct. Anterior appendages<br />

(Figure 43j) tapering, bidentate. Proximal teeth larger than<br />

distal teeth; both teeth tapering, distally curved towards each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, forming a crabclaw-like distal end. Posterior appendages<br />

(Figure 431) shorter and more abruptly tapering than anterior<br />

ones, bidentate. Proximal teeth much larger than distal teeth,<br />

triangular, directed laterally. Distal teeth slender, tapering and<br />

nearly erect. Guards symmetrically rounded and marginally<br />

serrated in all setigers; mucros absent. Pseudocompound<br />

falcigers and compound spinigers absent. Aciculae paired<br />

anteriorly, single posteriorly, amber-colored, tapering to<br />

straight tips; cross-section round. Subacicular hooks (Figure<br />

43k) pale amber, bidentate. Hooks first present from setiger 87<br />

(78 in paratype), missing in many setigers, always single<br />

(except for replacements). Hooks gently sigmoid, tapering,<br />

with distinct head. Proximal teeth larger than distal teeth,<br />

directed laterally. Distal teeth very small, directed obliquely<br />

distally. Guards distally rounded.<br />

UNKNOWN MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES.—Jaw structure;<br />

pygidium and anal cirri.<br />

EXPECTED STATES OF SELECTED UNKNOWN FEATURES.—<br />

Mx III short, forming part <strong>of</strong> distal arc with left Mx IV.<br />

CHARACTERS USED IN PREPARATION OF KEY NOT<br />

SCORED.—Inappropriate Characters: 34, 56, 60. Unknown<br />

Characters: 1, 2, 36-40, 42, 74, 78.<br />

ASSUMED STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PREPARING KEY.—37,1;<br />

38,1.<br />

REMARKS.—The original material <strong>of</strong> E. cariboea consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> three species; most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type lots, four specimens in ZMC<br />

and five in ZMB, belong to an abranchiate species with dark<br />

brown to black subacicular hooks and aciculae and smooth<br />

antennae. These specimens arc here considered as E. cariboea,<br />

for which a lectotypc was designated above. Some specimens,<br />

currently in ZMH, were designated as types <strong>of</strong> E. gagzoi by<br />

Augcncr (1922b). Finally, two specimens from ZMC arc here<br />

described as E. excariboea.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> excariboea is listed with similar species in Tables 33<br />

and 36. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most outstanding feature <strong>of</strong> this species is<br />

<strong>the</strong> very late start <strong>of</strong> both branchiae and subacicular hooks. It<br />

can be separated from all o<strong>the</strong>r species listed in Table 36 by<br />

having <strong>the</strong> notopodial cirri articulated throughout; <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species in this table lack notopodial articulations.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> fasciata (Risso, 1826)<br />

Leodice fasciata Risso, 1826:421.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> fasciata.—Heider, 1925:55-59, figs. 3-6.<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> torquata.—Grube, 1878a:99.—Fauvel, 1923:401.<br />

REMARKS.—No material is available; <strong>the</strong> species was<br />

referred doubtfully to <strong>Eunice</strong> torquata by Grube (1878:99) and<br />

Fauvel (1923:401). Heider (1925), in a brilliant study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

anterior anatomy <strong>of</strong> two species from <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean, gave<br />

a detailed description <strong>of</strong> a species he called E. fasciata. His<br />

arguments for identifying his material as Risso's species<br />

amounts to an assertion that "<strong>the</strong>re can be no doubt that his<br />

(Ehlers, 1868:312, <strong>of</strong> E. harassii) description... refers lo<strong>Eunice</strong><br />

fasciata" (Heider, 1925:59). There is nothing in Risso's<br />

original description to support this assertion. The material<br />

Heider studied belongs to <strong>Eunice</strong> torquata.<br />

Risso's species is insufficiently known to assign it even to<br />

group and is here considered wholly indeterminable.<br />

62. <strong>Eunice</strong> fauveli Gravier, 1900<br />

FIGURE 44; TABLES 33,35<br />

<strong>Eunice</strong> fauveli Gravier, 1900: 236-239, figs. 89-93, pi. 12: fig. 60.<br />

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Holotype, MNHN, Paris, Obock,<br />

Red Sea, coll. J. Jousseaume, 1894.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!