29.01.2015 Views

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

How social media enforce glocalization - <strong>the</strong> processes of identity change <strong>in</strong> selected ...<br />

new <strong>the</strong>n about new social media They are mostly free of charge, easy to use and access,<br />

web based, spread across unprecedented numbers of global populations and technically<br />

more developed s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y enable <strong>the</strong> manipulation of text, images and videos. They<br />

are currently dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> usage of World Wide Web <strong>in</strong> almost all countries around<br />

<strong>the</strong> world.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>se processes <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g Web 2.0 social media are new and still not part of<br />

substantial social and cultural research we will attempt to describe <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> processes<br />

and mechanisms that can and do <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> reshuffl<strong>in</strong>g of cultural identities 3 <strong>in</strong> a<br />

process of glocalization <strong>in</strong> Central and Sou<strong>the</strong>ast European countries. We understand<br />

glocalization as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> process of cultural change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of globalization.<br />

Robertson def<strong>in</strong>es it not as a polarity but as a complex relationship between <strong>the</strong> global<br />

and <strong>the</strong> local (1995: 35). 4<br />

The argumentation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> article is mostly <strong>the</strong>oretical and conceptual. The first<br />

section deals with globalization <strong>in</strong> general and <strong>the</strong> spread of communication structures<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular which <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> processes of shap<strong>in</strong>g and reshap<strong>in</strong>g cultures. In <strong>the</strong><br />

next section we describe how media communication types <strong>in</strong> contemporary network<br />

societies are be<strong>in</strong>g fundamentally changed. In <strong>the</strong> ensu<strong>in</strong>g section we discuss how <strong>the</strong><br />

notions of media space have evolved from hyperreality to virtual reality to digital<br />

space. In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section we describe how Facebook as a technological context<br />

enables communication and cultural identity reshap<strong>in</strong>g. F<strong>in</strong>ally we discuss <strong>the</strong> ways of<br />

reshuffl<strong>in</strong>g national culture through <strong>the</strong> example of Wikipedia.<br />

Rid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> globalization tide<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of globalization are far-reach<strong>in</strong>g changes of nation states and<br />

national societies. Beck describes globalization as a process <strong>in</strong> which transnational actors<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>terconnect and <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> reduction of power of nation states and underm<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fluence. Globalization produces different, more or less autonomous logics: economic,<br />

cultural, ecological, political, and so forth (Beck, 2003: 28). However, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> characteristic<br />

of all <strong>the</strong>se processes is that <strong>the</strong>y change <strong>the</strong> spatial and temporal coord<strong>in</strong>ates of social relations.<br />

Giddens describes globalization through a “disembedd<strong>in</strong>g mechanism” of lift<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> social<br />

relations from <strong>the</strong>ir local <strong>in</strong>teraction contexts and <strong>the</strong>ir restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side an unspecified<br />

time-space expansion (1990: 21). What Giddens means by space is, however, ra<strong>the</strong>r vague.<br />

Is it transborder space of <strong>in</strong>terconnected national territories or is it perhaps media space <strong>in</strong><br />

a media broadcast<strong>in</strong>g or network paradigm What <strong>in</strong>fluences most <strong>the</strong> disembedd<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

3<br />

We understand cultural identity as be<strong>in</strong>g formed and reshaped through processes of discursive<br />

exchange of values and symbols <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of <strong>in</strong>teraction and communication.<br />

4<br />

“The global is not <strong>in</strong> and of itself counterposed to <strong>the</strong> local. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, what is often referred<br />

to as <strong>the</strong> local is essentially <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global. In this respect globalization, def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> its most general sense as <strong>the</strong> compression of <strong>the</strong> world as a whole, <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

localities” (Robertson, 1995: 35).<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!