29.01.2015 Views

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Identity</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> (<strong>Post</strong>-)<strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Societies</strong><br />

politics of memory and identity is where culture becomes <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> arena of governance<br />

and resistance. Inseparable from <strong>the</strong>se matrices is <strong>the</strong> “post-politics”, through its<br />

depoliticization of <strong>the</strong> questions of freedom and equality and its over-celebration of<br />

difference and over-<strong>in</strong>sistence on identitarian issues through ra<strong>the</strong>r performative<br />

techniques of bestow<strong>in</strong>g “order” to societies <strong>in</strong> transition, after loss, atrocity and so forth.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> vectors of dissensus, resistance and radical truth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face of abjection/<br />

affect, <strong>in</strong>troduce doubt and controversy, situat<strong>in</strong>g art <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of experience, politics and<br />

capitalism. It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized fields of cultural production, arts and activism that new<br />

collective words and deeds are produced so as to assume bare life, our radical relationality<br />

and cont<strong>in</strong>gency as a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t, towards new re-imag<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>the</strong> political. We see<br />

this <strong>in</strong> fem<strong>in</strong>ist production and art <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region where an affirmative politics of witness<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to trauma does offer ways of identification and participation that are an au<strong>the</strong>ntic challenge<br />

to <strong>the</strong> populist/right-w<strong>in</strong>g/fascist mobilization of affect and passion on <strong>the</strong> one hand, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> aseptic liberal management of effect <strong>in</strong> white gloves and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> name of human rights,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r (see more <strong>in</strong> Husanović, 2007). When witness<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legacies of atrocity,<br />

ethical social relationships must be <strong>in</strong>stituted anew, based on critical reflection on <strong>the</strong><br />

orig<strong>in</strong>s and methods of violence, where mass atrocity is only <strong>the</strong> culm<strong>in</strong>ation of everyday<br />

biopolitical control over life and death. This battle is also <strong>the</strong> battle over <strong>the</strong> monument.<br />

Instead of <strong>the</strong> over-authorization of victims as “secular sa<strong>in</strong>ts” and <strong>the</strong> monopolization<br />

of experience where <strong>the</strong> politics of affectivity is based on <strong>the</strong> sacralization of horror <strong>in</strong><br />

a desacraliz<strong>in</strong>g world, <strong>the</strong>re is a political act of traumatic remember<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> attempt to<br />

speak communally and publicly about justice and equality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face of abject politics<br />

that resurrects <strong>the</strong> dead to serve <strong>the</strong> governance of (<strong>in</strong>ter)nationalized ghettoes s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a triple b<strong>in</strong>d of poverty, banality and corruption. 6 We must analyse precisely such<br />

<strong>in</strong>stances and acts of <strong>the</strong> politics of witness<strong>in</strong>g to trauma <strong>in</strong> search of new coord<strong>in</strong>ates<br />

of universal politics, from <strong>the</strong> field of cultural and knowledge production and public<br />

activism, where experiences are turned <strong>in</strong>to critical <strong>in</strong>sights and actions, collectively.<br />

This often occurs <strong>in</strong> particular forms of social activism, movements based on <strong>the</strong> politics<br />

of solidarity and equality (workers, students, women and o<strong>the</strong>r “o<strong>the</strong>rs”), as well as <strong>in</strong><br />

cultural and artistic production. It also occurs <strong>in</strong> specific forms of knowledge production<br />

that are tied to transformative action <strong>in</strong> various spaces of publicity. 7 Examples abound<br />

and we have to weave <strong>the</strong>m toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>in</strong> critical solidarity.<br />

6<br />

For more on this triple b<strong>in</strong>d, see Sullivan, 2002: 136.<br />

7<br />

I have explored <strong>the</strong>se elsewhere, especially <strong>in</strong> Chapters 6 and 7 of <strong>the</strong> monograph Između<br />

traume, nade i imag<strong>in</strong>acije (Husanović, 2010a). See also Husanović, 2009 and 2011c.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!