29.01.2015 Views

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report on <strong>the</strong> conference<br />

Peace Institute, Ljubljana, with a paper on “Perform<strong>in</strong>g identities: national <strong>the</strong>atres and<br />

re-construction of identities <strong>in</strong> Slovenia and SFR Yugoslavia” where he exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> role<br />

of national <strong>the</strong>atres <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction of identities <strong>in</strong> Slovenia and <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />

of <strong>the</strong> former Yugoslavia. The predom<strong>in</strong>antly historical approach was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with an<br />

analysis of <strong>the</strong> cultural, social and political position of national <strong>the</strong>atres <strong>in</strong> recent and not<br />

so recent ‘turbulent times’. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with a critical read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>atre identity politics <strong>in</strong><br />

newly established states, Milohnić also outl<strong>in</strong>ed some o<strong>the</strong>r important aspects of <strong>the</strong>atre<br />

policies related, for example, to <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g of national <strong>the</strong>atres, relations between<br />

national <strong>the</strong>atres and ‘<strong>in</strong>dependent’ <strong>the</strong>atre. In <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al part of <strong>the</strong> session, guest speaker<br />

and discussant Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Husanović from <strong>the</strong> University of Tuzla gave a presentation<br />

entitled “Culture of trauma and identity politics: critical frames and emancipatory<br />

lenses of cultural and knowledge production” where she reflected on <strong>the</strong> ways forward <strong>in</strong><br />

recent knowledge production with a focus on <strong>the</strong> gestures of repoliticization with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cultural politics of memory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> (post-)Yugoslav space. By comment<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

papers, Husanović highlighted <strong>the</strong> importance of artistic and scientific <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />

that question and redef<strong>in</strong>e contemporary cultural politics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of former<br />

Yugoslavia. The discussion that followed concentrated on <strong>the</strong>se issues, and thus prepared<br />

<strong>the</strong> terra<strong>in</strong> for <strong>the</strong> next panel that also focused on monument policy.<br />

The third panel consisted of a presentation of work by students from <strong>the</strong> University of<br />

Arts <strong>in</strong> Belgrade and was chaired by Milena Dragićević Šešić. The panel was opened by<br />

Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Gavrankapetanović-Redžić who gave an analysis of <strong>the</strong> centre for <strong>the</strong> Srebrenica-<br />

Potočari memorial and cemetery for <strong>the</strong> victims of <strong>the</strong> 1995 genocide <strong>in</strong> Bosnia and<br />

Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a. The follow<strong>in</strong>g presentation by Marijana Lub<strong>in</strong>a was devoted to an analysis<br />

of <strong>the</strong> work by <strong>the</strong> Croatian contemporary artist S<strong>in</strong>iša Labrović “Bandag<strong>in</strong>g wounds of<br />

a partisan fighter” as a response to <strong>the</strong> policy of forgett<strong>in</strong>g. Next, Vladimir Milad<strong>in</strong>ović<br />

spoke on <strong>the</strong> politicization of memory through <strong>the</strong> monument culture us<strong>in</strong>g some<br />

examples from Serbia. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g illustration of some of <strong>the</strong> aforementioned<br />

issues was given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g presentation by Dušan Nešković, which analysed <strong>the</strong><br />

monument dedicated to Karađorđe and Mišar’s heroes. As an addition to this panel<br />

Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Gavrankapetanović-Redžić made a short presentation of a paper from her<br />

colleague Iva Simčić that was devoted to <strong>the</strong> work by Braco Dimitrijević entitled “Under<br />

this stone <strong>the</strong>re is a monument to <strong>the</strong> victims of war and <strong>the</strong> cold war”.<br />

The rest of <strong>the</strong> Saturday afternoon was devoted to a work<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> project<br />

partners who discussed issues related to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uation of <strong>the</strong> project ma<strong>in</strong>ly connected<br />

to <strong>the</strong> publication of <strong>the</strong> conference proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> project results<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r more technical issues.<br />

The second day of <strong>the</strong> conference cont<strong>in</strong>ued with <strong>the</strong> fourth panel on “Mass media,<br />

social media and cultural identities”, chaired by Nada Švob-Đokić from <strong>the</strong> Institute<br />

for International Relations. The first presenter was Brankica Petković from <strong>the</strong> Peace<br />

Institute and she presented her work entitled “Erased languages, aroused alliances –<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!