Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies
Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies
Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Report on <strong>the</strong> conference<br />
Peace Institute, Ljubljana, with a paper on “Perform<strong>in</strong>g identities: national <strong>the</strong>atres and<br />
re-construction of identities <strong>in</strong> Slovenia and SFR Yugoslavia” where he exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> role<br />
of national <strong>the</strong>atres <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction of identities <strong>in</strong> Slovenia and <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />
of <strong>the</strong> former Yugoslavia. The predom<strong>in</strong>antly historical approach was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with an<br />
analysis of <strong>the</strong> cultural, social and political position of national <strong>the</strong>atres <strong>in</strong> recent and not<br />
so recent ‘turbulent times’. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with a critical read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>atre identity politics <strong>in</strong><br />
newly established states, Milohnić also outl<strong>in</strong>ed some o<strong>the</strong>r important aspects of <strong>the</strong>atre<br />
policies related, for example, to <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g of national <strong>the</strong>atres, relations between<br />
national <strong>the</strong>atres and ‘<strong>in</strong>dependent’ <strong>the</strong>atre. In <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al part of <strong>the</strong> session, guest speaker<br />
and discussant Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Husanović from <strong>the</strong> University of Tuzla gave a presentation<br />
entitled “Culture of trauma and identity politics: critical frames and emancipatory<br />
lenses of cultural and knowledge production” where she reflected on <strong>the</strong> ways forward <strong>in</strong><br />
recent knowledge production with a focus on <strong>the</strong> gestures of repoliticization with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cultural politics of memory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> (post-)Yugoslav space. By comment<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> previous<br />
papers, Husanović highlighted <strong>the</strong> importance of artistic and scientific <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />
that question and redef<strong>in</strong>e contemporary cultural politics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of former<br />
Yugoslavia. The discussion that followed concentrated on <strong>the</strong>se issues, and thus prepared<br />
<strong>the</strong> terra<strong>in</strong> for <strong>the</strong> next panel that also focused on monument policy.<br />
The third panel consisted of a presentation of work by students from <strong>the</strong> University of<br />
Arts <strong>in</strong> Belgrade and was chaired by Milena Dragićević Šešić. The panel was opened by<br />
Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Gavrankapetanović-Redžić who gave an analysis of <strong>the</strong> centre for <strong>the</strong> Srebrenica-<br />
Potočari memorial and cemetery for <strong>the</strong> victims of <strong>the</strong> 1995 genocide <strong>in</strong> Bosnia and<br />
Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a. The follow<strong>in</strong>g presentation by Marijana Lub<strong>in</strong>a was devoted to an analysis<br />
of <strong>the</strong> work by <strong>the</strong> Croatian contemporary artist S<strong>in</strong>iša Labrović “Bandag<strong>in</strong>g wounds of<br />
a partisan fighter” as a response to <strong>the</strong> policy of forgett<strong>in</strong>g. Next, Vladimir Milad<strong>in</strong>ović<br />
spoke on <strong>the</strong> politicization of memory through <strong>the</strong> monument culture us<strong>in</strong>g some<br />
examples from Serbia. An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g illustration of some of <strong>the</strong> aforementioned<br />
issues was given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g presentation by Dušan Nešković, which analysed <strong>the</strong><br />
monument dedicated to Karađorđe and Mišar’s heroes. As an addition to this panel<br />
Jasm<strong>in</strong>a Gavrankapetanović-Redžić made a short presentation of a paper from her<br />
colleague Iva Simčić that was devoted to <strong>the</strong> work by Braco Dimitrijević entitled “Under<br />
this stone <strong>the</strong>re is a monument to <strong>the</strong> victims of war and <strong>the</strong> cold war”.<br />
The rest of <strong>the</strong> Saturday afternoon was devoted to a work<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> project<br />
partners who discussed issues related to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uation of <strong>the</strong> project ma<strong>in</strong>ly connected<br />
to <strong>the</strong> publication of <strong>the</strong> conference proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> project results<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r more technical issues.<br />
The second day of <strong>the</strong> conference cont<strong>in</strong>ued with <strong>the</strong> fourth panel on “Mass media,<br />
social media and cultural identities”, chaired by Nada Švob-Đokić from <strong>the</strong> Institute<br />
for International Relations. The first presenter was Brankica Petković from <strong>the</strong> Peace<br />
Institute and she presented her work entitled “Erased languages, aroused alliances –<br />
169