29.01.2015 Views

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post-)Transitional Societies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cultural</strong> identities from <strong>the</strong> bottom up – labour relations perspective<br />

Incorporation of various forms of production <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market economy does not imply<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y will automatically be <strong>in</strong>dustrialized: some may be <strong>in</strong>dustrialized and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

may rema<strong>in</strong> artisanal, such as writ<strong>in</strong>g a manuscript.<br />

From this perspective, <strong>the</strong> arguments developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of “cognitive capitalism”<br />

seem simplified and <strong>the</strong> praise of “immaterial work” exaggerated (Vercellone, 2007;<br />

Virno, 2003). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs so far, analyses of “knowledge-driven<br />

production” must be carried out with certa<strong>in</strong> precaution. The “knowledge <strong>in</strong>dustry”,<br />

as it is called, was <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market economy without revers<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> usual<br />

relations of production <strong>in</strong> commodity production. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, mass commodity<br />

production has been expanded to some “knowledge <strong>in</strong>dustries”, such as publish<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

<strong>the</strong> university, for <strong>in</strong>stance. As a result <strong>the</strong>se two sectors converted <strong>in</strong>to big production<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es, similar to those <strong>in</strong> Ford factories, which produce books or knowledge as market<br />

commodities for mass consumers (Schiffr<strong>in</strong>, 2000; Krašovec, 2011). Only <strong>the</strong> work<br />

which could not be directly subsumed <strong>in</strong>to commodity production, such as artistic<br />

or scientific work proper, was <strong>in</strong>tact and left beh<strong>in</strong>d as artisanal. It was <strong>in</strong>corporated,<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead, by monetary dependence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circulation process, which we will exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> next sections.<br />

Conclusive remarks on production<br />

As we said, <strong>the</strong> author gives a manuscript which enters <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> production cha<strong>in</strong> as<br />

a semi-f<strong>in</strong>ished product or a raw material to <strong>the</strong> publisher; editors, proof readers, and<br />

designers <strong>the</strong>n change this manuscript <strong>in</strong>to a market commodity. At this moment <strong>the</strong><br />

author might get some remuneration for <strong>the</strong> time he has spent writ<strong>in</strong>g a manuscript, for<br />

materials (computer, <strong>in</strong>k, paper) and goods he has consumed dur<strong>in</strong>g his writ<strong>in</strong>g. He or<br />

she can <strong>the</strong>refore receive a k<strong>in</strong>d of “wage” from <strong>the</strong> publisher, but this is not <strong>the</strong> only<br />

reward to which <strong>the</strong> author has access. He or she may receive more when <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

book enters <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sphere of circulation.<br />

Circulation<br />

The circulation of cultural goods, such as books, is to a great extent regulated by<br />

restrictions of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights. Legal protection of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />

rights has extended normal property rights for physical objects (land, real estate, etc.) to<br />

“<strong>in</strong>tellectual creations” (books, pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, etc.). The right holder thus ga<strong>in</strong>s a privileged<br />

position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market or a monopoly and, particularly, <strong>the</strong> right to control and<br />

monetarize <strong>the</strong> use of protected works. It means that <strong>the</strong>y can, <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ed situations,<br />

charge for certa<strong>in</strong> uses of <strong>the</strong> protected commodity even after it has been sold to a buyer.<br />

At first glance, <strong>the</strong> exchange of books does not differ much from <strong>the</strong> exchange of o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

commodities. A book is offered on <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong> much <strong>the</strong> same way as a car or any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

commodity. When two contracted parties exchange a car, <strong>the</strong> buyer obta<strong>in</strong>s absolute<br />

ownership over <strong>the</strong> object. Let us imag<strong>in</strong>e, however, that <strong>the</strong> buyer of a book wishes to<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!