29.01.2015 Views

Measuring Impact - Nicva

Measuring Impact - Nicva

Measuring Impact - Nicva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Impact</strong> assessment involving users 39<br />

Methodology 6.2<br />

A three-stage plan was developed as the framework for the study. Three members of the<br />

refugee community were trained to act as research assistants. These were either ex-service<br />

users of EMEC or had some personal experience of the recent arrivals community. 12<br />

The three principal components of our approach are identified in the following sections.<br />

6.2.1 Stage one: Understanding the organisation and its context<br />

A key issue for many voluntary and community organisations is that the environment within<br />

which they operate is suboptimal (for example, providing services where market failure has<br />

occurred). So, identification of the operating context is key to understanding how the organisation<br />

makes a difference. It makes sense then, to begin with a mapping exercise to identify the context in<br />

which the organisation operates and the other organisations and stakeholders involved.<br />

This mapping exercise is based on consultation with key stakeholders, including project<br />

workers, partner organisations and other service providers. A ‘snowball’ approach was used<br />

to identify these stakeholders, starting from an initial set of contacts provided by EMEC and<br />

other Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) contacts. Preliminary face-to-face<br />

interviews were then carried out up to one level beyond the initial contacts, i.e. initial stakeholders<br />

plus a selection of stakeholders identified by them.<br />

The research co-ordinator conducted interviews with ten project co-ordinators from voluntary<br />

organisations identified on the stakeholder map, five counselling and managerial staff<br />

from EMEC and an associated project. At each interview the developing network map was<br />

shown to the interviewees for comment and amendment. The size, proximity and direction of<br />

relationships, as represented by arrows, were subjective and based on stakeholders’ perceptions<br />

of the nature of the relationships and the interrelation between activities.<br />

Contextual information from the other stages also informs this mapping exercise. A comparison<br />

between these stakeholders’ perspectives helps to map the organisation and its web of<br />

relations and partners. Figure 6.1 (overleaf) shows the system map as developed during the<br />

project. It shows the wider system in which the organisation is situated, and is based upon<br />

organisational networks.<br />

The diagram illustrates that voluntary and community sector organisations like EMEC are<br />

involved in a range of partnerships with public, private and academic sectors as well as joint<br />

initiatives with other voluntary organisations. This kind of mutually inclusive activity appears<br />

to be mediated by a series of networks (white circles in Figure 6.1) and joint-partnership projects<br />

(grey circles). Interviews with the service providers pointed to an extensive system of<br />

client referrals between the voluntary organisations on the map. The model suggests a distinct<br />

role, whereby voluntary organisations such as EMEC appear to fill in gaps in service provision<br />

rather than trying to compete with each other.<br />

12 See Tomlins et al, for study using ethnic minority research assistants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!