Measuring Impact - Nicva
Measuring Impact - Nicva
Measuring Impact - Nicva
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
24 <strong>Measuring</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> – Case-studies of impact assessment<br />
4.3.4 The outcomes and impacts with the widest distribution<br />
Outcomes or impacts that occurred in at least ten of the 21 activity areas are listed in Table<br />
4.3. These descriptions are indicative of the most common ways that voluntary organisations<br />
describe their outcomes or impact. Some appear in both lists, reflecting the different language<br />
used by the respondents.<br />
OUTCOMES<br />
IMPACTS<br />
• Quality of life<br />
• Confidence and esteem<br />
• Skills, general and personal<br />
• Community development,<br />
social inclusion and safety<br />
• Health (general), child<br />
development and mental<br />
health<br />
• People supported<br />
• Participation in, and effect on,<br />
service provision<br />
• Empowerment<br />
• Access to learning, employment<br />
and cultural activities<br />
• Financial, fundraising and<br />
standard of living<br />
• Changes in organisations<br />
• Public awareness<br />
• Public awareness<br />
• Community safety<br />
• Local economy<br />
• Pride in the area<br />
• Reduced demand on public<br />
services<br />
• Social inclusion<br />
• Community development<br />
• Local employment<br />
• Improved health and<br />
well-being<br />
• Participation in local decision<br />
making<br />
• Enhanced cultural life<br />
• Improved local environment,<br />
nature conservation and<br />
recycling<br />
• Changes in organisations<br />
• Service provision<br />
Table 4.3 – Main outcomes and impacts cited by groups<br />
4.3.5 Activity areas with large numbers of outcome and impact descriptors<br />
The activity areas were ranked according to the number of different descriptors that were<br />
cited by organisations of that type (Table 4.4). This gives a list of types of organisation whose<br />
impact is more likely to be easily described by the outcome and impact descriptors cited here<br />
through to those that would probably require tailored methodologies. Two activity areas did<br />
not have enough case-studies to give an accurate representation.