29.01.2015 Views

Measuring Impact - Nicva

Measuring Impact - Nicva

Measuring Impact - Nicva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 <strong>Measuring</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> – Case-studies of impact assessment<br />

4.3.4 The outcomes and impacts with the widest distribution<br />

Outcomes or impacts that occurred in at least ten of the 21 activity areas are listed in Table<br />

4.3. These descriptions are indicative of the most common ways that voluntary organisations<br />

describe their outcomes or impact. Some appear in both lists, reflecting the different language<br />

used by the respondents.<br />

OUTCOMES<br />

IMPACTS<br />

• Quality of life<br />

• Confidence and esteem<br />

• Skills, general and personal<br />

• Community development,<br />

social inclusion and safety<br />

• Health (general), child<br />

development and mental<br />

health<br />

• People supported<br />

• Participation in, and effect on,<br />

service provision<br />

• Empowerment<br />

• Access to learning, employment<br />

and cultural activities<br />

• Financial, fundraising and<br />

standard of living<br />

• Changes in organisations<br />

• Public awareness<br />

• Public awareness<br />

• Community safety<br />

• Local economy<br />

• Pride in the area<br />

• Reduced demand on public<br />

services<br />

• Social inclusion<br />

• Community development<br />

• Local employment<br />

• Improved health and<br />

well-being<br />

• Participation in local decision<br />

making<br />

• Enhanced cultural life<br />

• Improved local environment,<br />

nature conservation and<br />

recycling<br />

• Changes in organisations<br />

• Service provision<br />

Table 4.3 – Main outcomes and impacts cited by groups<br />

4.3.5 Activity areas with large numbers of outcome and impact descriptors<br />

The activity areas were ranked according to the number of different descriptors that were<br />

cited by organisations of that type (Table 4.4). This gives a list of types of organisation whose<br />

impact is more likely to be easily described by the outcome and impact descriptors cited here<br />

through to those that would probably require tailored methodologies. Two activity areas did<br />

not have enough case-studies to give an accurate representation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!