Meeting the Challenge: - The Council of Independent Colleges
Meeting the Challenge: - The Council of Independent Colleges Meeting the Challenge: - The Council of Independent Colleges
John R. Thelin at the age of 40 so he could become a college president. As president of Wabash College in Indiana from 1941 to 1956, he combined a commitment to his own campus with attention to the larger sphere of higher education philanthropy in the business community. After World War II, Sparks led an ambitious plan to create a “Greater Wabash.” It became a model for selfrevitalization at small colleges. As a college president, Sparks emphasized multiple initiatives. These included healing the schisms between college officials and old-guard alumni; reconstructing the board of trustees as a powerful body of prominent, wealthy individuals; recruiting nationally distinguished professors to the small college; renovating and expanding the campus and physical plant; and attracting sustained, large-scale financial support. The convergence of these initiatives gave Wabash College national visibility as a “pillar of strength” in the private sector. Sparks’ aim was to associate his college—and all private colleges—with the philosophy of independence and self-reliance characteristic of the American private business sector. President Sparks’ visionary leadership at Wabash College provided a platform for his larger commitment to the character and health of all independent colleges in Indiana and nationwide. The commitment sprang from his concern after World War II that the recent growth of state and President Frank Sparks’ visionary leadership at Wabash College in Indiana provided a platform for his larger commitment to the character and health of all independent colleges. (Sparks is pictured on the left.) 13
Small by Design: Resilience in an Era of Mass Higher Education federal support for higher education also carried the threat of government control in higher education. As he wrote at the time, “Federal aid to education almost certainly will mean the disappearance from our educational system of the independent, privately financed, liberal arts colleges.” Sparks talked with leaders from business and industry as well as board members and presidents at other independent colleges in the state. The resulting Associated Colleges of Indiana soon fostered counterparts elsewhere, particularly in Ohio, Michigan, New York, and California. The hallmark of these early associations was the partnership between college presidents and corporate leaders. As historians Curti and Nash observed, Sparks emphasized that “liberal arts colleges preserve freedom; they produce many essential scientists and business executives; tax laws make it inexpensive to give, since corporations could deduct up to 5 percent of their net income for contributions to charitable institutions and causes.” The creation of state associations to support independent colleges eventually led to national initiatives. The Council for Financial Aid to Education was incorporated in 1952 “with funds supplied by the General Education Board, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Ford Foundation’s Fund for the Advancement of Education.” In 1957 business and academic leaders created the Informal Committee for Corporate Aid to American Universities. Thanks in large part to these efforts, the Council for Financial Aid to Education could report more than $42 million in corporate contributions in 1962. An important development in the support of independent higher education came in 1951, when the affluent Ford Foundation created its Fund for the Advancement of Education. Emphasizing innovation beyond “business as usual,” this initiative helped a variety of colleges and universities explore new curricula. In 1955 the Ford Foundation awarded a total of $210 million to 630 private liberal arts colleges. The goal was to encourage this diverse group of institutions to raise faculty salaries. Since eligibility for the Foundation’s awards depended on regional accreditation, a number of colleges were prompted to shore up both their curricular and financial structures in compliance with accreditation standards. Indeed, CIC’s origin in 1956 was an indirect consequence of this Ford largesse (this story is told on pages 63–86). A few years later, the Ford Foundation identified a smaller group of 126 institutions to share an award of $50 million, again with an emphasis on raising faculty salaries. Many of the Ford programs required matching grants, so participating colleges were obliged to raise dollars from new sources to release the Foundation’s funds. 14
- Page 1 and 2: Meeting the Challenge: America’s
- Page 3 and 4: Meeting the Challenge: America’s
- Page 6 and 7: John R. Thelin is University Resear
- Page 8 and 9: Thanks also are due to all the tale
- Page 10 and 11: Preface Richard Ekman The Council o
- Page 12 and 13: Small by Design: Resilience in an E
- Page 14 and 15: John R. Thelin Enrollment, Public a
- Page 16 and 17: John R. Thelin provide affordable,
- Page 18 and 19: John R. Thelin The long-run demogra
- Page 20 and 21: John R. Thelin Independent liberal
- Page 24 and 25: John R. Thelin “The undergraduate
- Page 26 and 27: John R. Thelin In American higher e
- Page 28 and 29: John R. Thelin had a positive influ
- Page 30 and 31: John R. Thelin records in science a
- Page 32 and 33: John R. Thelin things grow in the s
- Page 34 and 35: John R. Thelin since the program st
- Page 36 and 37: John R. Thelin combined with a decl
- Page 38 and 39: John R. Thelin Some of the major ch
- Page 40 and 41: John R. Thelin From the 1960s to th
- Page 42 and 43: John R. Thelin University of the Oz
- Page 44: John R. Thelin over the past half-c
- Page 47 and 48: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 49 and 50: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 51 and 52: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 53 and 54: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 55 and 56: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 57 and 58: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 59 and 60: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 61 and 62: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 63 and 64: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 65 and 66: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 67 and 68: Serving Students Well: Independent
- Page 69: Serving Students Well: Independent
Small by Design: Resilience in an Era <strong>of</strong> Mass Higher Education<br />
federal support for higher education also carried <strong>the</strong> threat<br />
<strong>of</strong> government control in higher education. As he wrote<br />
at <strong>the</strong> time, “Federal aid to education almost certainly will<br />
mean <strong>the</strong> disappearance from our educational system <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
independent, privately financed, liberal arts colleges.”<br />
Sparks talked with leaders from business and<br />
industry as well as board members and presidents at o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
independent colleges in <strong>the</strong> state. <strong>The</strong> resulting Associated<br />
<strong>Colleges</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indiana soon fostered counterparts elsewhere,<br />
particularly in Ohio, Michigan, New York, and California.<br />
<strong>The</strong> hallmark <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se early associations was <strong>the</strong> partnership<br />
between college presidents and corporate leaders. As<br />
historians Curti and Nash observed, Sparks emphasized that<br />
“liberal arts colleges preserve freedom; <strong>the</strong>y produce many<br />
essential scientists and business executives; tax laws make it<br />
inexpensive to give, since corporations could deduct up to 5<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir net income for contributions to charitable<br />
institutions and causes.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> state associations to support<br />
independent colleges eventually led to national initiatives.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for Financial Aid to Education was incorporated<br />
in 1952 “with funds supplied by <strong>the</strong> General Education<br />
Board, <strong>the</strong> Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, <strong>the</strong> Carnegie<br />
Corporation, and <strong>the</strong> Ford Foundation’s Fund for <strong>the</strong><br />
Advancement <strong>of</strong> Education.” In 1957 business and academic<br />
leaders created <strong>the</strong> Informal Committee for Corporate Aid to<br />
American Universities. Thanks in large part to <strong>the</strong>se efforts,<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for Financial Aid to Education could report<br />
more than $42 million in corporate contributions in 1962.<br />
An important development in <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong><br />
independent higher education came in 1951, when<br />
<strong>the</strong> affluent Ford Foundation created its Fund for <strong>the</strong><br />
Advancement <strong>of</strong> Education. Emphasizing innovation<br />
beyond “business as usual,” this initiative helped a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> colleges and universities explore new curricula. In 1955<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ford Foundation awarded a total <strong>of</strong> $210 million to<br />
630 private liberal arts colleges. <strong>The</strong> goal was to encourage<br />
this diverse group <strong>of</strong> institutions to raise faculty salaries.<br />
Since eligibility for <strong>the</strong> Foundation’s awards depended on<br />
regional accreditation, a number <strong>of</strong> colleges were prompted<br />
to shore up both <strong>the</strong>ir curricular and financial structures<br />
in compliance with accreditation standards. Indeed, CIC’s<br />
origin in 1956 was an indirect consequence <strong>of</strong> this Ford<br />
largesse (this story is told on pages 63–86). A few years<br />
later, <strong>the</strong> Ford Foundation identified a smaller group <strong>of</strong> 126<br />
institutions to share an award <strong>of</strong> $50 million, again with<br />
an emphasis on raising faculty salaries. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ford<br />
programs required matching grants, so participating colleges<br />
were obliged to raise dollars from new sources to release <strong>the</strong><br />
Foundation’s funds.<br />
14