Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault
Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault
Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chris Falk<br />
Stefanie Morand<br />
<strong>McCarthy</strong> Tétrault LLP<br />
commented on the CRA’s position in light of the provisions and the scheme of the Act. This<br />
paper updates that discussion to take into account subsequent CRA statements, as well as the<br />
decisions of the Tax Court of Canada in MacDonald 5 and McClarty Family Trust 6 released<br />
earlier this year.<br />
Subsection 164(6) Capital Loss Planning<br />
Subsection 164(6) capital loss carry-back planning is another technique employed by tax<br />
practitioners to relieve against the double taxation that can arise under the Act as a result of the<br />
deemed disposition on death.<br />
In concept, the planning involves the creation of a capital loss in the estate’s first taxation year<br />
which is carried back to offset the capital gain on death. The planning typically involves the<br />
winding-up of the corporation owned by the estate and/or a redemption of all or some portion of<br />
the estate’s shares therein. 7<br />
Subsection 164(6) is an exceptional provision in that it allows, in some circumstances, the<br />
capital loss sustained by the estate on the wind-up or redemption to be carried back to the<br />
deceased’s terminal return and applied against the capital gain that arose as a consequence of<br />
the deemed disposition on death. 8 The provision requires that the loss be sustained in the<br />
estate’s first taxation year, and is subject to numerous stop-loss rules.<br />
At the 2012 Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (“STEP”) Round Table, the CRA was<br />
asked to comment on the interaction of subsections 40(3.6), 40(3.61) and 164(6) and, in so<br />
doing, expressed a view that could render subsection 164(6) capital loss carry-back planning<br />
unavailable for many estates.<br />
This paper comments generally on the issue raised at the STEP Round Table and the CRA’s<br />
response.<br />
Eligible Dividend Designations Following Budget 2012<br />
This paper concludes with a brief update on two relieving measures enacted following Budget<br />
2012.<br />
* * *<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
MacDonald v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1145 (TCC), under appeal by the Crown to the Federal Court of Appeal<br />
[“MacDonald”].<br />
McClarty Family Trust v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1123 (TCC) [“McClarty Family Trust”].<br />
For purposes of this paper, a reference to a redemption includes a purchase for cancellation.<br />
The term “exceptional” is used since the provision permits the loss of one taxpayer (i.e., the estate) to be applied<br />
against the gain of another (i.e., the deceased).<br />
560600/422632<br />
MT DOCS 11864055v1G<br />
2