29.01.2015 Views

Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault

Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault

Presentation Material - McCarthy Tétrault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chris Falk<br />

Stefanie Morand<br />

<strong>McCarthy</strong> Tétrault LLP<br />

commented on the CRA’s position in light of the provisions and the scheme of the Act. This<br />

paper updates that discussion to take into account subsequent CRA statements, as well as the<br />

decisions of the Tax Court of Canada in MacDonald 5 and McClarty Family Trust 6 released<br />

earlier this year.<br />

Subsection 164(6) Capital Loss Planning<br />

Subsection 164(6) capital loss carry-back planning is another technique employed by tax<br />

practitioners to relieve against the double taxation that can arise under the Act as a result of the<br />

deemed disposition on death.<br />

In concept, the planning involves the creation of a capital loss in the estate’s first taxation year<br />

which is carried back to offset the capital gain on death. The planning typically involves the<br />

winding-up of the corporation owned by the estate and/or a redemption of all or some portion of<br />

the estate’s shares therein. 7<br />

Subsection 164(6) is an exceptional provision in that it allows, in some circumstances, the<br />

capital loss sustained by the estate on the wind-up or redemption to be carried back to the<br />

deceased’s terminal return and applied against the capital gain that arose as a consequence of<br />

the deemed disposition on death. 8 The provision requires that the loss be sustained in the<br />

estate’s first taxation year, and is subject to numerous stop-loss rules.<br />

At the 2012 Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (“STEP”) Round Table, the CRA was<br />

asked to comment on the interaction of subsections 40(3.6), 40(3.61) and 164(6) and, in so<br />

doing, expressed a view that could render subsection 164(6) capital loss carry-back planning<br />

unavailable for many estates.<br />

This paper comments generally on the issue raised at the STEP Round Table and the CRA’s<br />

response.<br />

Eligible Dividend Designations Following Budget 2012<br />

This paper concludes with a brief update on two relieving measures enacted following Budget<br />

2012.<br />

* * *<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

MacDonald v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1145 (TCC), under appeal by the Crown to the Federal Court of Appeal<br />

[“MacDonald”].<br />

McClarty Family Trust v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1123 (TCC) [“McClarty Family Trust”].<br />

For purposes of this paper, a reference to a redemption includes a purchase for cancellation.<br />

The term “exceptional” is used since the provision permits the loss of one taxpayer (i.e., the estate) to be applied<br />

against the gain of another (i.e., the deceased).<br />

560600/422632<br />

MT DOCS 11864055v1G<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!