- Page 1 and 2: Hipology 2010 COA Meeting April 17,
- Page 3 and 4: Disclosures • None relevant to th
- Page 5 and 6: Major Points * In North America, mo
- Page 7 and 8: “It seems clear that either osteo
- Page 9: Joint Function Activity level Insta
- Page 12 and 13: “We see what we know.” Frank Ph
- Page 14 and 15: The Contemporary Mechanical Theory
- Page 16 and 17: Etiology of OA of the Hip-1986 •
- Page 18 and 19: MAJOR POINTS * A labral tear is usu
- Page 20 and 21: Acetabular Rim Syndrome(s) • Groi
- Page 22 and 23: Step-Wise Analysis of the Symptomat
- Page 24 and 25: Good News About OA in the Hip • R
- Page 26 and 27: The Normal Hip: Anatomic Characteri
- Page 28 and 29: The Normal Hip: Mechanical Characte
- Page 30 and 31: Important Definitions • Instabili
- Page 32 and 33: Hip Mechanics (INSTABILITY) (IMPIN
- Page 34 and 35: How can joints go wrong mechanicall
- Page 36 and 37: Hip Mechanics • IMPINGEMENTINSTAB
- Page 38 and 39: Femoro-Acetabular Impingement as a
- Page 40 and 41: Femoro-Acetabular Impingement • F
- Page 42 and 43: Femoro-Acetabular Impingement as a
- Page 44 and 45: Herniation pit; usually means cam-
- Page 48: CAM Impingement-Mechanism CAM Type
- Page 61 and 62: Delamination of Cartilage
- Page 63 and 64: Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 65 and 66: Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 67 and 68: (pincer) M:F = 4:12 pistol grip/ ca
- Page 69 and 70: Etiologies of Hip OA in North Ameri
- Page 71 and 72: Acetabulum-Based Femoro- Acetabular
- Page 73 and 74: “We see what we know.” Frank Ph
- Page 75: Pincer Impingement-Mechanism PINCER
- Page 80 and 81: Impingement of Acetabular Rim Contr
- Page 84 and 85: Protusio Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 86 and 87: Campincer Impingement • Commonest
- Page 88 and 89: Clinical Evaluation for Femoro- Ace
- Page 90 and 91: Contour of the Head-Neck Junction a
- Page 92 and 93: Imaging for F-A Impingement • Pla
- Page 94 and 95: Analysis for F-A Impingement • Pl
- Page 96 and 97:
Treatment of pincer impingement (pr
- Page 98 and 99:
Treatment of combined femoral and a
- Page 100 and 101:
Prerequisite for “Safe” Surgica
- Page 102 and 103:
Surgical Dislocation Technique •
- Page 104 and 105:
Lateral Position
- Page 106 and 107:
Greater Trochanter Piriformis Tendo
- Page 108 and 109:
Femoral Head Acetabulum
- Page 110:
Improved Access
- Page 114 and 115:
Early Harvard Experience with Surgi
- Page 119 and 120:
Pre-op, postop offset creation by n
- Page 122:
• Acknowledgement to Professor R.
- Page 126 and 127:
Cartilage Delamination due to Impin
- Page 128 and 129:
Outcome depends on pre-existing dam
- Page 130 and 131:
Hip Joint-Preserving Techniques Ext
- Page 133 and 134:
Hip Arthroscopy • What it IS: A s
- Page 135:
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
- Page 141 and 142:
Etiologies of Hip OA in North Ameri
- Page 143 and 144:
DDH: Primary Anatomic Characteristi
- Page 145 and 146:
Clinical Evaluation of the Patient
- Page 147:
Plain Radiography: The Gold Standar
- Page 150 and 151:
Acetabular depth and version • An
- Page 152 and 153:
Indications for Joint-Preserving Th
- Page 154 and 155:
Site(s) of Correction • Willy Sut
- Page 156 and 157:
Acetabular Redirectional Osteotomy
- Page 158 and 159:
Bernese Periacetabular • Single i
- Page 160:
Arthrotomy • Useful if labral sx,
- Page 164 and 165:
Positioning of the osteotomized fra
- Page 166 and 167:
14 yo F 1 yr hx limp
- Page 169 and 170:
Now 49 yo; 11.5 y after PAO; no sym
- Page 171 and 172:
CH PAO Numbers • >1100 hips (1991
- Page 173 and 174:
5-15 yr Boston PAO Followup: Mathen
- Page 175 and 176:
“Salvage” Joint-Preserving Proc
- Page 178 and 179:
Diarthrodial Joint Function Activit
- Page 180:
Summary Thoughts on Osteotomy and R