- Page 1 and 2:
Hipology 2010 COA Meeting April 17,
- Page 3 and 4:
Disclosures • None relevant to th
- Page 5 and 6:
Major Points * In North America, mo
- Page 7 and 8:
“It seems clear that either osteo
- Page 9:
Joint Function Activity level Insta
- Page 12 and 13:
“We see what we know.” Frank Ph
- Page 14 and 15:
The Contemporary Mechanical Theory
- Page 16 and 17:
Etiology of OA of the Hip-1986 •
- Page 18 and 19:
MAJOR POINTS * A labral tear is usu
- Page 20 and 21:
Acetabular Rim Syndrome(s) • Groi
- Page 22 and 23:
Step-Wise Analysis of the Symptomat
- Page 24 and 25:
Good News About OA in the Hip • R
- Page 26 and 27:
The Normal Hip: Anatomic Characteri
- Page 28 and 29:
The Normal Hip: Mechanical Characte
- Page 30 and 31:
Important Definitions • Instabili
- Page 32 and 33:
Hip Mechanics (INSTABILITY) (IMPIN
- Page 34 and 35:
How can joints go wrong mechanicall
- Page 36 and 37:
Hip Mechanics • IMPINGEMENTINSTAB
- Page 38 and 39:
Femoro-Acetabular Impingement as a
- Page 40 and 41:
Femoro-Acetabular Impingement • F
- Page 42 and 43:
Femoro-Acetabular Impingement as a
- Page 44 and 45:
Herniation pit; usually means cam-
- Page 46 and 47:
Femur-based FAI: Cam Impingement
- Page 48:
CAM Impingement-Mechanism CAM Type
- Page 61 and 62:
Delamination of Cartilage
- Page 63 and 64:
Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 65 and 66:
Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 67 and 68:
(pincer) M:F = 4:12 pistol grip/ ca
- Page 69 and 70: Etiologies of Hip OA in North Ameri
- Page 71 and 72: Acetabulum-Based Femoro- Acetabular
- Page 73 and 74: “We see what we know.” Frank Ph
- Page 75: Pincer Impingement-Mechanism PINCER
- Page 80 and 81: Impingement of Acetabular Rim Contr
- Page 84 and 85: Protusio Ortho Uni Berne
- Page 86 and 87: Campincer Impingement • Commonest
- Page 88 and 89: Clinical Evaluation for Femoro- Ace
- Page 90 and 91: Contour of the Head-Neck Junction a
- Page 92 and 93: Imaging for F-A Impingement • Pla
- Page 94 and 95: Analysis for F-A Impingement • Pl
- Page 96 and 97: Treatment of pincer impingement (pr
- Page 98 and 99: Treatment of combined femoral and a
- Page 100 and 101: Prerequisite for “Safe” Surgica
- Page 102 and 103: Surgical Dislocation Technique •
- Page 104 and 105: Lateral Position
- Page 106 and 107: Greater Trochanter Piriformis Tendo
- Page 108 and 109: Femoral Head Acetabulum
- Page 110: Improved Access
- Page 114 and 115: Early Harvard Experience with Surgi
- Page 119: Pre-op, postop offset creation by n
- Page 124: SCFE - osteoplasty
- Page 127 and 128: Points on Femoro-Acetabular Impinge
- Page 129 and 130: Clinical Evaluation for Femoro- Ace
- Page 131: Points on Surgical Dislocation Appr
- Page 134 and 135: Extra-articular Impingement Relief
- Page 139: Anterior femoro-acetabular impingem
- Page 142 and 143: Major Points about Hip Dysplasia
- Page 144 and 145: MechanicalCharacteristics of DDH *
- Page 146 and 147: Imaging Possibilities • Plain rad
- Page 149 and 150: Imaging for Hip Dysplasia • The f
- Page 151 and 152: Imaging for Hip Dysplasia • Plain
- Page 153 and 154: Treatment Goals in DDH: Create join
- Page 155 and 156: Surgical Rules for DDH • Congruen
- Page 157 and 158: Joint-PreservingTreatment of Congru
- Page 159 and 160: PAO • Patient selection • Preop
- Page 163 and 164: Correction/Acetabular Reorientation
- Page 165 and 166: Positioning of the osteotomized fra
- Page 167: • 38 yo nurse 13 y post left Stee
- Page 170 and 171:
Our post-PAO Program • Epidural f
- Page 172 and 173:
Middle-Term Results of PAO: Bern an
- Page 174 and 175:
Important prognostic factors after
- Page 176:
Chiari Osteotomy • Salvage proced
- Page 179 and 180:
The Bottom Line/The END!! • Most