Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC
Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC
Table 4-6b Over-water Meteorological Data for Pismo Beach, California 1982 Tair- Julian Ht WS WD Tair Tsea RH Mixing dT/dz Year Month Day Day Hour (m) (m/s) (deg) (ºK) (ºK) (%) Ht (m) (ºK/m) Iy 82 6 21 172 14 7 2.70 280.0 287.7 2.0 83.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.073 82 6 21 172 15 7 3.11 276.0 287.5 1.5 84.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.024 82 6 21 172 16 7 2.61 269.0 287.3 1.4 86.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.037 82 6 21 172 17 7 1.60 261.0 287.3 1.5 87.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.120 82 6 21 172 18 7 1.86 276.0 286.9 1.2 89.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.358 82 6 22 173 15 7 2.42 274.0 288.6 1.7 80.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.106 82 6 22 173 16 7 3.82 268.0 288.8 2.1 78.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.058 82 6 22 173 17 7 2.90 268.0 288.7 2.4 77.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.049 82 6 22 173 18 7 2.80 274.0 287.9 2.0 81.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.072 82 6 22 173 19 7 2.06 289.0 287.2 1.3 84.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.187 82 6 22 173 20 7 1.90 280.0 286.6 0.8 87.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.175 82 6 24 175 13 7 3.07 269.0 288.1 0.9 82.0 600.0 0.0002 0.527 82 6 24 175 14 7 2.80 271.0 288.2 0.8 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.290 82 6 24 175 15 7 4.62 269.0 288.1 0.6 84.0 600.0 0.0002 0.131 82 6 24 175 16 7 4.60 272.0 288.4 0.8 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.026 82 6 24 175 17 7 4.40 268.0 288.4 0.9 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.037 82 6 24 175 17 7 4.60 262.0 288.4 1.0 84.0 600.0 0.0002 0.037 82 6 25 176 12 7 4.22 286.0 288.9 2.2 76.0 100.0 0.0002 0.024 82 6 25 176 13 7 4.98 280.0 288.5 2.6 80.0 100.0 0.0002 0.028 82 6 25 176 14 7 6.60 278.0 288.3 2.3 83.0 100.0 0.0002 0.031 82 6 25 176 15 7 8.25 286.0 288.3 2.6 82.0 100.0 0.0002 0.096 82 6 25 176 16 7 7.51 288.0 288.3 2.9 82.0 100.0 0.0002 0.016 82 6 25 176 17 7 7.83 290.0 288.4 3.2 81.0 100.0 0.0002 0.021 82 6 25 176 18 7 8.20 294.0 288.8 3.8 78.0 100.0 0.0002 0.051 82 6 27 178 12 7 7.00 290.0 286.9 2.9 94.0 100.0 0.0002 0.061 82 6 27 178 13 7 10.50 284.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.016 82 6 27 178 14 7 10.10 284.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.019 82 6 27 178 15 7 10.30 283.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.035 82 6 27 178 16 7 10.79 287.0 287.0 3.4 93.0 100.0 0.0002 0.019 82 6 27 178 17 7 10.40 285.0 287.5 3.8 93.0 100.0 0.0002 0.021 82 6 27 178 18 7 8.35 285.0 287.7 3.7 94.0 100.0 0.0002 0.136 Note: Bold identifies hours in the evaluation dataset Final Report Vol.1 44
Geophysical Processing Gridded land use and terrain elevation data for the CALMET geophysical file are obtained from the USGS. The terrain data are from the one-degree 1:250,000-scale DEM dataset, with an approximate resolution of 90m. Land use data are from the 1:250,000-scale Composite Grid Theme (CTG) dataset, with a resolution of 200m. Because the spatial variation in land use is the primary geophysical property for this application, a modeling grid is chosen that places each land use datapoint in the center of a model grid cell. The modeling grid chosen to cover the area is defined by: Map Projection: UTM (Zone 11N) Datum: NAS-C (North American 1927) SW Corner Coordinates (km): (282.1, 3779.1) Number of cells (nx,ny): (115,100) Cell Size (km): 0.200 The CALMET preprocessors TERREL, CTGPROC, and MAKEGEO are applied to convert the geophysical datasets to this modeling grid, creating the CALMET GEO.DAT file. Coordinate transformations are applied to the source and receptor locations listed in the OCD4 model runs in order to register these features to land use and terrain data in the GEO.DAT file. The OCD4 dataset uses a local grid system that is not referenced to UTM coordinates. These (x,y) coordinates are translated to align the sampler locations with roadway features that are discernable on aerial photographs and that are indicated on the experiment site map. The resulting map of the experiment region is shown in Figure 4-4. Sampling Arc 1, nearest the coast, lies at elevations between 3m and 6m. Most of sampling Arc 2 lies at elevations between 15m and 25m, but the terrain at the northern end rises to more than 100m. Source & Receptor Characterization Tracer releases are characterized as modeled in the OCD4 evaluation. All are modeled with downwash, using the boat dimensions as a solid building with the length perpendicular to the wind. A minimal exit velocity is used to remove any momentum rise. Final Report Vol.1 45
- Page 1 and 2: Development of the Next Generation
- Page 3 and 4: 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this
- Page 5 and 6: • Prognostic Meteorological Model
- Page 7 and 8: o 1: Maul (1980)-Carson (1973) o 2:
- Page 9 and 10: into 50 tiles (90 RUC grid-points/t
- Page 11 and 12: y H ( 1− 34.15z / L) 1/ 3 = (3-9)
- Page 13 and 14: During execution, the bulk algorith
- Page 15 and 16: Anemometer Height Adjustment for La
- Page 17 and 18: T (ºK) g (m/s 2 ) temperature grav
- Page 19 and 20: adjusted to account for the effect
- Page 21 and 22: Two methods of supplying the timesc
- Page 23 and 24: cell is the cell that determines th
- Page 25 and 26: June 4 (1130-1230 CET) L. Turbulenc
- Page 27 and 28: 4. MODEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 4.1
- Page 29 and 30: The CALMET preprocessors TERREL, CT
- Page 31 and 32: All sampler locations are used as r
- Page 33 and 34: Table 4-2b Over-water Meteorologica
- Page 35 and 36: Meteorological data used in the OCD
- Page 37 and 38: . . CARPINTERIA, CA 3814 . UTM Nort
- Page 39 and 40: Year Month Day Table 4-4 Over-water
- Page 41 and 42: Datum: NAS-C (North American 1927)
- Page 43 and 44: Table 4-5 Source Characterization f
- Page 45: Table 4-6a Over-water Meteorologica
- Page 49 and 50: Table 4-7 Source Characterization f
- Page 51 and 52: tape format called GF-3. These data
- Page 53 and 54: . . Strait of Oresund 6230 6220 UTM
- Page 55 and 56: . . Strait of Oresund 6230 6220 UTM
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4-10 SEA.DAT Meteorological D
- Page 59 and 60: the numbers refer to ICOARE values,
- Page 61 and 62: that are simulated during the one-h
- Page 63 and 64: 4.3 Evaluation Results Cameron, Car
- Page 65 and 66: improve model performance relative
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 4-7. Graphical depiction of
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 4-8. Graphical depiction of
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 4-9. Graphical depiction of
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 4-10. Graphical depiction of
- Page 75 and 76: Table 4-15 Performance Statistics f
- Page 77 and 78: Performance of CALPUFF Configuratio
- Page 79 and 80: Table 4-16 Performance Statistics f
- Page 81 and 82: Table 4-16 (continued) Performance
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 4-12. Graphical depiction of
- Page 85 and 86: into CALPUFF, and the simulations a
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-18 Oresund Results with Min
- Page 89 and 90: Table 4-20 Oresund Results with Min
- Page 91 and 92: Table 4-21 Performance Statistics f
- Page 93 and 94: 4.4 Recommendations A minimum σ v
- Page 95 and 96: SEA.DAT and OZONE.DAT files are pro
Table 4-6b<br />
Over-w<strong>at</strong>er Meteorological D<strong>at</strong>a for Pismo Beach, California<br />
1982<br />
Tair-<br />
Julian Ht WS WD Tair Tsea RH Mixing dT/dz<br />
Year Month Day Day Hour (m) (m/s) (deg) (ºK) (ºK) (%) Ht (m) (ºK/m) Iy<br />
82 6 21 172 14 7 2.70 280.0 287.7 2.0 83.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.073<br />
82 6 21 172 15 7 3.11 276.0 287.5 1.5 84.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.024<br />
82 6 21 172 16 7 2.61 269.0 287.3 1.4 86.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.037<br />
82 6 21 172 17 7 1.60 261.0 287.3 1.5 87.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.120<br />
82 6 21 172 18 7 1.86 276.0 286.9 1.2 89.0 800.0 -0.0018 0.358<br />
82 6 22 173 15 7 2.42 274.0 288.6 1.7 80.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.106<br />
82 6 22 173 16 7 3.82 268.0 288.8 2.1 78.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.058<br />
82 6 22 173 17 7 2.90 268.0 288.7 2.4 77.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.049<br />
82 6 22 173 18 7 2.80 274.0 287.9 2.0 81.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.072<br />
82 6 22 173 19 7 2.06 289.0 287.2 1.3 84.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.187<br />
82 6 22 173 20 7 1.90 280.0 286.6 0.8 87.0 700.0 -0.0048 0.175<br />
82 6 24 175 13 7 3.07 269.0 288.1 0.9 82.0 600.0 0.0002 0.527<br />
82 6 24 175 14 7 2.80 271.0 288.2 0.8 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.290<br />
82 6 24 175 15 7 4.62 269.0 288.1 0.6 84.0 600.0 0.0002 0.131<br />
82 6 24 175 16 7 4.60 272.0 288.4 0.8 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.026<br />
82 6 24 175 17 7 4.40 268.0 288.4 0.9 83.0 600.0 0.0002 0.037<br />
82 6 24 175 17 7 4.60 262.0 288.4 1.0 84.0 600.0 0.0002 0.037<br />
82 6 25 176 12 7 4.22 286.0 288.9 2.2 76.0 100.0 0.0002 0.024<br />
82 6 25 176 13 7 4.98 280.0 288.5 2.6 80.0 100.0 0.0002 0.028<br />
82 6 25 176 14 7 6.60 278.0 288.3 2.3 83.0 100.0 0.0002 0.031<br />
82 6 25 176 15 7 8.25 286.0 288.3 2.6 82.0 100.0 0.0002 0.096<br />
82 6 25 176 16 7 7.51 288.0 288.3 2.9 82.0 100.0 0.0002 0.016<br />
82 6 25 176 17 7 7.83 290.0 288.4 3.2 81.0 100.0 0.0002 0.021<br />
82 6 25 176 18 7 8.20 294.0 288.8 3.8 78.0 100.0 0.0002 0.051<br />
82 6 27 178 12 7 7.00 290.0 286.9 2.9 94.0 100.0 0.0002 0.061<br />
82 6 27 178 13 7 10.50 284.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.016<br />
82 6 27 178 14 7 10.10 284.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.019<br />
82 6 27 178 15 7 10.30 283.0 286.8 3.0 95.0 100.0 0.0002 0.035<br />
82 6 27 178 16 7 10.79 287.0 287.0 3.4 93.0 100.0 0.0002 0.019<br />
82 6 27 178 17 7 10.40 285.0 287.5 3.8 93.0 100.0 0.0002 0.021<br />
82 6 27 178 18 7 8.35 285.0 287.7 3.7 94.0 100.0 0.0002 0.136<br />
Note: Bold identifies hours in the evalu<strong>at</strong>ion d<strong>at</strong>aset<br />
Final Report Vol.1 44
Change language