Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC

Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC Volume 1 - The Atmospheric Studies Group at TRC

29.01.2015 Views

Turbulence Advection Option Gryning (1985) presents an overview of the Oresund experiments, and comments on particular features of the boundary layer resolved by measurements made during the June 5 experiment. There is evidence of vertical motion in the flow over the Oresund strait that may be associated with the changes in surface properties across the landsea boundary. There are also direct measurements of turbulence dissipation at a number of elevations along transects that cross the strait. One transect at about 270m on June 5 cited by Gryning shows a distinct and gradual lowering of the turbulence with distance across the strait, and an abrupt rise downwind of the far shoreline (over Copenhagen). Initial modeling of the Oresund experiments with CALMET/CALPUFF substantially overpredicts peak concentrations in five of the nine experiments, four of these by about a factor of 10. Peak concentrations predicted for the remaining four experiments are well within a factor of two. No application issues have been identified that can account for the overpredictions, but they are all associated with elevated (95m-high) non-buoyant tracer releases from a shoreline tower on the upwind side of the strait. The initial dispersion of these releases across the 20km distance to the opposite shore is controlled by the calculated overwater turbulence, which is much smaller than the turbulence calculated over land both upwind and downwind of the strait. This suggests that advected turbulence energy is an important factor to include in these simulations. CALMET includes the effect of advection on mixing heights and temperatures, but turbulence velocities are computed locally in CALPUFF. This local calculation can be broadened to incorporate a contribution from upwind cells. Vickers et al. (2001) discuss the decay of turbulence energy with downwind distance in offshore flow in terms of the local value of the friction velocity at a given height. They define an advective-decay timescale τ over which the friction velocity transitions from the (larger) overland value u *0 to the (smaller) overwater equilibrium value u *eq with transport time from the coast, t, and write: u 2 * 2 * eq 2 2 −t / τ ( u − u ) e = u + (3-52) *0 * eq We approximate the exponential decay as a linear decay to limit the number of upwind cells to process each sampling step and write: 2 2 ( σ − σ )( 1 − 0.7 τ ) 2 2 σ = σ + / (3-53) w, v w, vL w, vU w, vL t where the σ w,v refers to either σ w or σ v , subscript L identifies the local value at puff height, and subscript U identifies the upwind value at the same puff height. The local Final Report Vol.1 20

cell is the cell that determines the current puff properties. The time t is determined by the wind speed at puff height in the local cell and the distance from the center of the local cell to the particular upwind cell being processed. Only cells that are upwind and within the time horizon t = τ/0.7, and that have a turbulence velocity larger that the local turbulence velocity are processed, and only the largest increase in σ 2 (the second term on the right including the decay factor) is retained. The advective-decay timescale τ is entered as a control file input to CALPUFF. A value that is representative of the Oresund experiments can be estimated from aircraft measurements. Turbulence dissipation profiles at several heights during three of the experiments are shown in Figures 3-1 through 3-3. The upwind shoreline is at about grid coordinate 370 km and the transport is to the west or from right to left in these figures. A linear decay in turbulence is approximated by eye to obtain a subjective decay distance across the strait that ranges from 12-14 km on May 29 and June 4, and 14-16 km on June 5. CALMET wind speeds in the layer between 90m and 120m during the hour in which the flights were made are extracted near the upwind shore and halfway across the strait to estimate average transport speeds near the release height (95m). The easting component of these speeds average 11.4 m/s on May 29, 12.8 m/s on June 4, and 11.8 m/s on June 5. The corresponding decay times average 1145s, so the inferred timescale (τ = 0.7 t) is about 800s. The performance evaluation of CALPUFF using the 800s turbulence advective-decay timescale shows a substantial improvement. Final Report Vol.1 21

Turbulence Advection Option<br />

Gryning (1985) presents an overview of the Oresund experiments, and comments on<br />

particular fe<strong>at</strong>ures of the boundary layer resolved by measurements made during the<br />

June 5 experiment. <strong>The</strong>re is evidence of vertical motion in the flow over the Oresund<br />

strait th<strong>at</strong> may be associ<strong>at</strong>ed with the changes in surface properties across the landsea<br />

boundary. <strong>The</strong>re are also direct measurements of turbulence dissip<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> a<br />

number of elev<strong>at</strong>ions along transects th<strong>at</strong> cross the strait. One transect <strong>at</strong> about 270m<br />

on June 5 cited by Gryning shows a distinct and gradual lowering of the turbulence<br />

with distance across the strait, and an abrupt rise downwind of the far shoreline (over<br />

Copenhagen).<br />

Initial modeling of the Oresund experiments with CALMET/CALPUFF substantially<br />

overpredicts peak concentr<strong>at</strong>ions in five of the nine experiments, four of these by<br />

about a factor of 10. Peak concentr<strong>at</strong>ions predicted for the remaining four<br />

experiments are well within a factor of two. No applic<strong>at</strong>ion issues have been<br />

identified th<strong>at</strong> can account for the overpredictions, but they are all associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />

elev<strong>at</strong>ed (95m-high) non-buoyant tracer releases from a shoreline tower on the<br />

upwind side of the strait. <strong>The</strong> initial dispersion of these releases across the 20km<br />

distance to the opposite shore is controlled by the calcul<strong>at</strong>ed overw<strong>at</strong>er turbulence,<br />

which is much smaller than the turbulence calcul<strong>at</strong>ed over land both upwind and<br />

downwind of the strait.<br />

This suggests th<strong>at</strong> advected turbulence energy is an important factor to include in<br />

these simul<strong>at</strong>ions. CALMET includes the effect of advection on mixing heights and<br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ures, but turbulence velocities are computed locally in CALPUFF. This<br />

local calcul<strong>at</strong>ion can be broadened to incorpor<strong>at</strong>e a contribution from upwind cells.<br />

Vickers et al. (2001) discuss the decay of turbulence energy with downwind distance<br />

in offshore flow in terms of the local value of the friction velocity <strong>at</strong> a given height.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y define an advective-decay timescale τ over which the friction velocity<br />

transitions from the (larger) overland value u *0 to the (smaller) overw<strong>at</strong>er equilibrium<br />

value u *eq with transport time from the coast, t, and write:<br />

u<br />

2<br />

*<br />

2<br />

* eq<br />

2 2 −t<br />

/ τ<br />

( u − u ) e<br />

= u +<br />

(3-52)<br />

*0<br />

* eq<br />

We approxim<strong>at</strong>e the exponential decay as a linear decay to limit the number of<br />

upwind cells to process each sampling step and write:<br />

2<br />

2<br />

( σ − σ )( 1 − 0.7 τ )<br />

2 2<br />

σ = σ +<br />

/<br />

(3-53)<br />

w, v w,<br />

vL w,<br />

vU w,<br />

vL<br />

t<br />

where the σ w,v refers to either σ w or σ v , subscript L identifies the local value <strong>at</strong> puff<br />

height, and subscript U identifies the upwind value <strong>at</strong> the same puff height. <strong>The</strong> local<br />

Final Report Vol.1 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!