Download - Российский комитет Программы ЮНЕСКО ...

we identify structures, circuits, and formulas, implementing these properties
in natural languages we can use them while creating artificial languages ​and
programming systems, as well as other means of information description,
storage and processing.
It is commonly known that operating systems, programming languages​,
information processing tools and almost all software used today are Englishbased.
Therefore, they are based on Western mentality.
English as a fusional analytic language has almost zero morphology (compared
with agglutinative languages). Complex meaning is communicated with
phrases, which requires a much more complicated analysis and, consequently,
an increase in the amount of memory and time required to process information.
The only way out of this situation is eliminating wider context and complex
structures and, ultimately, simplifying the meaning and semantics. Thus, the
basis of the English language itself brings computing systems to a deadlock,
causing them not to get “smarter”, but to increase system performance
and memory capacity, i.e. develop functional characteristics rather than
“intelligence”.
Even the language structure and its syntax discourage the active character
of knowledge. English is an SVO language, and it is not the information that
dictates what action to take, what methods and algorithms to use for its
processing. On the contrary, the means, the circuit, the algorithms force us to
format, structure, and modify information.
Unlike Indo-European languages​, Turkic languages ​refer to the SOV type
and in this case it is information that comes first. Our research shows that
due to regular morphology and natural complexity agglutinative Turkic
languages, including Tatar, can be efficient tools for creating intelligent
information processing systems. They provide for ultimate solutions in terms
of information storage and processing. The meaning of a text is much more
easily conveyed on the lexical level due to these languages’ ability to encode
meaning synthetically, i.e. in a word form. Other types of languages, including
English and Russian, have to convey the meaning by using several phrases or
even groups of sentences.
Such features of the Tatar language as its agglutinative character, strong
algorithmic patterns, minor exceptions, powerful meta-system, rather rigid
syntax and active character of knowledge allow us to consider it to be a good
basis for creating an intermediate language and even for developing new
operating system based on a new ideology.
183