Proceedings of Topical Meeting on Optoinformatics (pdf-format, 1.21 ...

Proceedings of Topical Meeting on Optoinformatics (pdf-format, 1.21 ... Proceedings of Topical Meeting on Optoinformatics (pdf-format, 1.21 ...

28.01.2015 Views

26 OPTOINFORMATICS’05 (b) Photoacoustic and photothermal measurements under annealing ong>ofong> samples. (c) Photoacoustic and photothermal measurement and imaging ong>ofong> samples under the given external loading. These experiments are performed on metals and ceramics. The 2D photodeflection, photoreflectance and photoacoustic piezoelectric images ong>ofong> regions near Vickers indentations in metals and ceramics are obtained by using different modes ong>ofong> operation ong>ofong> our microscope. It is shown, for example, that external normal and shear stresses influence on the photoacoustic signal near the radial crack tips in ceramics. It is also shown that the main features ong>ofong> the photoacoustic piezoelectric 2D images ong>ofong> Vickers indentation zones in ceramics are very similar to the images obtained by SPATE method and by Raman microscopy ong>ofong> the Vickers indentations in the crystalline silicon. Our experiments demonstrate the influence ong>ofong> stress on the photoacoustic effect in various materials. The obtained experimental results can be used for an estimation ong>ofong> sensitivity ong>ofong> the photoacoustic method to mechanical stresses in ductile and brittle materials. The model ong>ofong> the photoacoustic thermoelastic effect in solids with residual stresses is proposed by us and used for the explanation ong>ofong> the obtained results. It is based on the modified Murnaghan model ong>ofong> nonlinear elastic bodies which takes into account a possible dependence ong>ofong> the thermoelastic constant ong>ofong> a material on stress. The proposed model is applied to investigation ong>ofong> the photoacoustic signal behavior near the radial crack tips in modern ceramics. The analytical expressions for the photoacoustic signal in 3D case are obtained within the framework ong>ofong> the perturbation theory. It is demonstrated that the developed theoretical model for the photoacoustic piezoelectric effect agrees qualitatively with the available experimental data for ceramics and metals. The application ong>ofong> the obtained experimental and theoretical results to the problem ong>ofong> measurement ong>ofong> the stress intensity factors near the crack tips is discussed. In conclusion, in this work we have analyzed the situation in the field ong>ofong> mechanical stress measurement and imaging. The nonlinear theoretical model ong>ofong> the photoacoustic effect in stressed materials has been developed which explains the influence ong>ofong> stresses on the photoacoustic effect with the thermoelastic coefficient dependence on stress. The influence ong>ofong> external and residual stresses on the photoacoustic effect was established for brittle and ductile materials. This research was supported by the RFBR under award No. 04-02-17622. 1. K.L.Muratikov, A.L.Glazov, D.N.Rose, J.E.Dumar, and G.H.Quay, Tech. Phys. Lett. 23, 188 (1997). 2. K.L.Muratikov, A.L.Glazov, D.N.Rose, and J.E.Dumar, Tech. Phys. Lett. 24, 846 (1998). 3. K.L.Muratikov, A.L.Glazov, D.N.Rose, and J.E.Dumar, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 2948 (2000). 4. K.L.Muratikov, A.L.Glazov, Proc. SPIE. 4680, 167 (2002). 5. K.L.Muratikov, A.L.Glazov, D.N.Rose, and J.E.Dumar, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 722 (2003).

SAINT-PETERSBURG, October 17 – 20, 2005 27 ESTIMATION OF INFLUENCE OF STATISTICAL ERRORS ON AN ACURACY OF CALIBRATION OF THE SPACE SOLAR PATROL INSTRUMENTATION AT A SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE Afanas’ev I.M., S.I. Vavilov State Optical Institute, Tuchkov lane, 1; St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia; e-mail: afanasy@rambler.ru In the article the values ong>ofong> statistical errors, dealt with random character both emitting ong>ofong> synchrotron radiation (SR) in a storage ring, and registration ong>ofong> a SR by a receiving tract ong>ofong> the Space Solar patrol (SSP) instrumentation, are evaluated. The SSP instrumentation has been created to monitor the ionizing radiation from the Sun in the spectral range 0,14 – 198 nm from space apparatus. It consists ong>ofong> a Radiometer with 20 filters and two grating spectrometers [1] . The absolute spectral calibration ong>ofong> the SSP instrumentation in the spectral range from 0,25 up to 122 nm (5000 - 10 eV) has been preparing by the special metrological stations at the SR sources ong>ofong> the storage rings VEPP-3 and VEPP-4 (at the G.I. Budker Institute ong>ofong> Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia) [2] . All SSP measuring channels have "solar-blind" detectors – open secondaryelectron multipliers (SEM), which have high sensitivity to radiation below 160 nm [1] . The registration ong>ofong> radiation by the SSP instrumentation is realized with SEM in pulse mode. The aleatory variable ong>ofong> fluctuation ong>ofong> counting rate f (which is the SSP output signal [3] ) is taken into account by the apparatus error σ app , which is distributed accordingly normal law. It is stipulated by random character both SR beam intensity I, and losses in the SSP registering channel η. [3] In the given calculation, the losses are admitted to the constant value η=τ⋅γ=10 -4 electron/photon (thus, not taking into account their spectral character), where τ - effective transmission ong>ofong> the SSP channel (mainly, filters for the Radiometer and a polychromator for spectrometers; for both cases τ is about 10 -2 ) [4] , and γ - quantum efficiency ong>ofong> the SEM photocathode (average value is about 10 -2 ) [4] . Thus, the signal ong>ofong> counting rate will amount to f=I⋅η=10 4 pulses/sec, at the SR beam intensity I=10 8 photon/sec (see, table). The root-mean-square deviation f from the expected aleatory variable f is "noise" ong>ofong> the SSP output signal, which hinders the measured signal the more, the lower value ong>ofong> a counting rate (i.e. the lower level a loading ong>ofong> a SSP registering channel). For unambiguous explanation ong>ofong> calibration results it must be used the one-electron mode at measurements. The two-electron event is considered as a certain hindering factor - "noise". It should be noticed, that the multi-electron events at the given estimation are not considered. As a matter ong>ofong> fact, the ratio ong>ofong> probabilities ong>ofong> one and two-electron events P(1)/P(2) is the "signal-to-noise merit", inverse value ong>ofong> which is the statistical error σ stat . It is supposed, that probability distribution ong>ofong> aleatory variable ong>ofong> appearing ong>ofong> one, m −λ two, etc. photoelectron events at experiment is described by the Poisson law: λ ⋅e P( m) = ; m! where λ - expectation, which is the multiplication ong>ofong> the SR beam intensity I (including its modulation with frequency ong>ofong> circulation ong>ofong> electron beam f VEPP-4 at the VEPP-4 storage ring about 1 MHz) [3] by attenuation losses at the registering tract η; m – value ong>ofong> acts ong>ofong> photoelectron emission from the SEM photocathode (i.e. appearance ong>ofong> one-electron event (OEE) if m=1, two-electron event (TEE) if m=2, etc).

SAINT-PETERSBURG, October 17 – 20, 2005 27<br />

ESTIMATION OF INFLUENCE OF STATISTICAL ERRORS ON AN<br />

ACURACY OF CALIBRATION OF THE SPACE SOLAR PATROL<br />

INSTRUMENTATION AT A SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE<br />

Afanas’ev I.M., S.I. Vavilov State Optical Institute, Tuchkov lane, 1; St. Petersburg,<br />

199034, Russia; e-mail: afanasy@rambler.ru<br />

In the article the values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistical errors, dealt with random character both<br />

emitting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> synchrotr<strong>on</strong> radiati<strong>on</strong> (SR) in a storage ring, and registrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

SR by a receiving tract <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Space Solar patrol (SSP) instrumentati<strong>on</strong>, are<br />

evaluated.<br />

The SSP instrumentati<strong>on</strong> has been created to m<strong>on</strong>itor the i<strong>on</strong>izing radiati<strong>on</strong> from the<br />

Sun in the spectral range 0,14 – 198 nm from space apparatus. It c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a Radiometer<br />

with 20 filters and two grating spectrometers [1] . The absolute spectral calibrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

SSP instrumentati<strong>on</strong> in the spectral range from 0,25 up to 122 nm (5000 - 10 eV) has been<br />

preparing by the special metrological stati<strong>on</strong>s at the SR sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the storage rings<br />

VEPP-3 and VEPP-4 (at the G.I. Budker Institute <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,<br />

Russia) [2] . All SSP measuring channels have "solar-blind" detectors – open sec<strong>on</strong>daryelectr<strong>on</strong><br />

multipliers (SEM), which have high sensitivity to radiati<strong>on</strong> below 160 nm [1] . The<br />

registrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> radiati<strong>on</strong> by the SSP instrumentati<strong>on</strong> is realized with SEM in pulse mode.<br />

The aleatory variable <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fluctuati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> counting rate f (which is the SSP output<br />

signal [3] ) is taken into account by the apparatus error σ app , which is distributed accordingly<br />

normal law. It is stipulated by random character both SR beam intensity I, and losses in the<br />

SSP registering channel η. [3] In the given calculati<strong>on</strong>, the losses are admitted to the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stant value η=τ⋅γ=10 -4 electr<strong>on</strong>/phot<strong>on</strong> (thus, not taking into account their spectral<br />

character), where τ - effective transmissi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the SSP channel (mainly, filters for the<br />

Radiometer and a polychromator for spectrometers; for both cases τ is about 10 -2 ) [4] , and γ<br />

- quantum efficiency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the SEM photocathode (average value is about 10 -2 ) [4] . Thus, the<br />

signal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> counting rate will amount to f=I⋅η=10 4 pulses/sec, at the SR beam intensity I=10 8<br />

phot<strong>on</strong>/sec (see, table). The root-mean-square deviati<strong>on</strong> f from the expected aleatory<br />

variable f is "noise" <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the SSP output signal, which hinders the measured signal the more,<br />

the lower value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a counting rate (i.e. the lower level a loading <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a SSP registering<br />

channel).<br />

For unambiguous explanati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> calibrati<strong>on</strong> results it must be used the <strong>on</strong>e-electr<strong>on</strong><br />

mode at measurements. The two-electr<strong>on</strong> event is c<strong>on</strong>sidered as a certain hindering factor -<br />

"noise". It should be noticed, that the multi-electr<strong>on</strong> events at the given estimati<strong>on</strong> are not<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered. As a matter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact, the ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probabilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e and two-electr<strong>on</strong> events<br />

P(1)/P(2) is the "signal-to-noise merit", inverse value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which is the statistical error σ stat .<br />

It is supposed, that probability distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> aleatory variable <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> appearing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e,<br />

m −λ<br />

two, etc. photoelectr<strong>on</strong> events at experiment is described by the Poiss<strong>on</strong> law: λ ⋅e<br />

P(<br />

m)<br />

= ;<br />

m!<br />

where λ - expectati<strong>on</strong>, which is the multiplicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the SR beam intensity I<br />

(including its modulati<strong>on</strong> with frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> circulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> electr<strong>on</strong> beam f VEPP-4 at the<br />

VEPP-4 storage ring about 1 MHz) [3] by attenuati<strong>on</strong> losses at the registering tract η;<br />

m – value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> acts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> photoelectr<strong>on</strong> emissi<strong>on</strong> from the SEM photocathode (i.e.<br />

appearance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e-electr<strong>on</strong> event (OEE) if m=1, two-electr<strong>on</strong> event (TEE) if m=2, etc).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!