28.01.2015 Views

Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department

Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department

Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOURPU'AL OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 90. NUMBER 1 I JULY 2001<br />

Control <strong>of</strong> size and density <strong>of</strong> InAs/(AI,Ga)As self-organized islands<br />

P. Ballet, J. 6. Smathers, H. Yang, C. L. Workman, and G. J. salamoa)<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Physics</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong>'<strong>Arkansas</strong>, Fayetteville, <strong>Arkansas</strong> 72701<br />

(Received 19 July 2000; accepted for publication 29 January 2001)<br />

We report on the influence <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the (Al, Ga)As surface on the forniation<br />

<strong>of</strong> strain induced three-dimensional (3D) InAs islands. Thc expcriments havc bcen carried out using<br />

a molecular beam epitaxy facility combined with a scanning tunneling ~nicroscope enabling in situ<br />

surface characterization. The evolution <strong>of</strong> the dcnsity and nlorphology <strong>of</strong> these islands is<br />

investigated as a function <strong>of</strong> the Al composition. The InAs deposition, substrate temperature, and<br />

annealing time cffccts on the island foln~ation and nlorphology are studied. The morphologies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

(Al, Ga)As surface as well as that <strong>of</strong> the reconstructed InAs "wetting layer" are also described.<br />

Rcsults indicate that there are major differences between the InAsIGaAs and the lnAs/AIAs systems<br />

despite the same lattice mismatch. We observe these differences varying the aluminum content in<br />

the starting (Al, Ga)As surface. We show that control <strong>of</strong> the A1 fraction leads to control <strong>of</strong> the size<br />

and density <strong>of</strong> the 3D islands. The control <strong>of</strong> island density and size as well as the growth mode <strong>of</strong><br />

these islands is explained by considering the difference in surface mobility and cation intermixing<br />

between these two systems. Our observation is that strain energy is not the only parameter<br />

goveining the fonnation <strong>of</strong> 3D islands but the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the different layers involved is<br />

proved to significantly affect island properties. 0 2001 An~erican Institute oJ'<strong>Physics</strong>.<br />

[DOI: 10.1063/1.1357784]<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

Strain induced self-assembled three-dimensional (3D) islands<br />

have been studied extensively during the past few<br />

years. Both the electronic and optical properties <strong>of</strong> quantum<br />

dots obtaincd by capping thesc islai~ds with a higher bandgap<br />

material have also been the subject <strong>of</strong> numerous experimental<br />

and theoretical works.'--"his intense interest has<br />

been driven by the quantum dot unique properties, such as, a<br />

discrete atomic-like energy level structure, due to carrier<br />

confinement. For cxample, the atomic-like structure, and its<br />

consequence in the form <strong>of</strong> a "phonon bottleneck" effect,<br />

has the potential to significantly impact optoelectronic devices<br />

through the lengthening <strong>of</strong> carrier ~ifetiines."~ The experimental<br />

report <strong>of</strong> Guyot-Sionllest et nl. on the intraband<br />

relaxation time in CdSe colloidal quantum dots shows what<br />

is evidence <strong>of</strong> this effect with decays on the order <strong>of</strong> 200 ps.9<br />

Longer lifetimes can result in lower laser thresholds and<br />

highly sensitive detectors. Despite many exciting possibilities,<br />

howevcr, the inhoinogeneous broadening resulting froin<br />

size fluctuations can be seen as a serious obstacle. The size<br />

inhomogeneity causes the emission linewidth <strong>of</strong> an ensemble<br />

<strong>of</strong> quantum dots to be typically 2 orders-<strong>of</strong>-magnitude larger<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> a single dot.",' While relatively narrow photoluminescence<br />

linewidths, on the order <strong>of</strong> 20-30 meV, have<br />

recently been reported, these results have not been achieved<br />

by reducing the size inhomogeneity. Rather, the narrow linewidths<br />

have been cleverly achieved by either growing large<br />

dots, leading to decreased sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the emission energy<br />

to the size <strong>of</strong> the dots, or by growing layers <strong>of</strong> dots and<br />

enhancing carrier tunneling to the biggest neighbor prior tc)<br />

recombination. '"I3<br />

Even with the difficulty <strong>of</strong> the size inhomogeneity, significant<br />

applications have been demonstrated using quantum<br />

dots as active layers and recombination centers. These include<br />

light emitting diodes (LEDS)" and room teinperaturc<br />

lasers oscillating at 1.3 pnl using either thc classical cdgc<br />

emitting design1' or the VCSEL configuration.'%ore recently,<br />

lasing from excited states has been evidenced."<br />

Other demonstrated applications use the confinement enhanced<br />

optical nonlinearity for inidinfrared second and thirdharmonic<br />

enhanced carrier trapping efficiency<br />

for photorefraction20 and the mid- and far-infrared<br />

~onductivity''.~~ for the fabrication <strong>of</strong> quantum dot infrared<br />

photodetectors.23-25 In some cases some very tantalizing<br />

suggestions to make use <strong>of</strong> the size inhomogeneity may even<br />

lead to applications.2h<br />

During the last several years research carried out on<br />

quantum dot structures in 111-V seniiconductors has focused<br />

on Stranski-Krastanov (SK) growth inodcs. The SK growth<br />

Inode takes place during the growth <strong>of</strong> lattice-mismatched<br />

systems and has been shown to produce narrow size distributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3D isla~lds. For this growth mode, i.e., small interface<br />

energy but large lattice mismatch, initial growth is<br />

layer by layer. As a result, deposited materials first fosnl a<br />

two-dimensional (7D) wctting laycr on the substrate. As material<br />

continues to be deposited it is energetically favorable<br />

for material to add to the step edges <strong>of</strong> the 2D islands as<br />

opposed to adding to the top to begin 3D island formation. In<br />

this way, the 2D islands grow laterally in size. However, this<br />

is done at energy cost as the strain energy continues to increase<br />

due to the lattice n~isn~atch. Soon it bccomcs cnergeti-<br />

@ 2001 American Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Physics</strong><br />

Downloaded 09 Mar 2008 to 130.184.237.6. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http:lljap.aip.orgljaplcopyright.jsp

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!