Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department
Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department
Three - University of Arkansas Physics Department
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JOURPU'AL OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 90. NUMBER 1 I JULY 2001<br />
Control <strong>of</strong> size and density <strong>of</strong> InAs/(AI,Ga)As self-organized islands<br />
P. Ballet, J. 6. Smathers, H. Yang, C. L. Workman, and G. J. salamoa)<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Physics</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong>'<strong>Arkansas</strong>, Fayetteville, <strong>Arkansas</strong> 72701<br />
(Received 19 July 2000; accepted for publication 29 January 2001)<br />
We report on the influence <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the (Al, Ga)As surface on the forniation<br />
<strong>of</strong> strain induced three-dimensional (3D) InAs islands. Thc expcriments havc bcen carried out using<br />
a molecular beam epitaxy facility combined with a scanning tunneling ~nicroscope enabling in situ<br />
surface characterization. The evolution <strong>of</strong> the dcnsity and nlorphology <strong>of</strong> these islands is<br />
investigated as a function <strong>of</strong> the Al composition. The InAs deposition, substrate temperature, and<br />
annealing time cffccts on the island foln~ation and nlorphology are studied. The morphologies <strong>of</strong> the<br />
(Al, Ga)As surface as well as that <strong>of</strong> the reconstructed InAs "wetting layer" are also described.<br />
Rcsults indicate that there are major differences between the InAsIGaAs and the lnAs/AIAs systems<br />
despite the same lattice mismatch. We observe these differences varying the aluminum content in<br />
the starting (Al, Ga)As surface. We show that control <strong>of</strong> the A1 fraction leads to control <strong>of</strong> the size<br />
and density <strong>of</strong> the 3D islands. The control <strong>of</strong> island density and size as well as the growth mode <strong>of</strong><br />
these islands is explained by considering the difference in surface mobility and cation intermixing<br />
between these two systems. Our observation is that strain energy is not the only parameter<br />
goveining the fonnation <strong>of</strong> 3D islands but the chemical nature <strong>of</strong> the different layers involved is<br />
proved to significantly affect island properties. 0 2001 An~erican Institute oJ'<strong>Physics</strong>.<br />
[DOI: 10.1063/1.1357784]<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
Strain induced self-assembled three-dimensional (3D) islands<br />
have been studied extensively during the past few<br />
years. Both the electronic and optical properties <strong>of</strong> quantum<br />
dots obtaincd by capping thesc islai~ds with a higher bandgap<br />
material have also been the subject <strong>of</strong> numerous experimental<br />
and theoretical works.'--"his intense interest has<br />
been driven by the quantum dot unique properties, such as, a<br />
discrete atomic-like energy level structure, due to carrier<br />
confinement. For cxample, the atomic-like structure, and its<br />
consequence in the form <strong>of</strong> a "phonon bottleneck" effect,<br />
has the potential to significantly impact optoelectronic devices<br />
through the lengthening <strong>of</strong> carrier ~ifetiines."~ The experimental<br />
report <strong>of</strong> Guyot-Sionllest et nl. on the intraband<br />
relaxation time in CdSe colloidal quantum dots shows what<br />
is evidence <strong>of</strong> this effect with decays on the order <strong>of</strong> 200 ps.9<br />
Longer lifetimes can result in lower laser thresholds and<br />
highly sensitive detectors. Despite many exciting possibilities,<br />
howevcr, the inhoinogeneous broadening resulting froin<br />
size fluctuations can be seen as a serious obstacle. The size<br />
inhomogeneity causes the emission linewidth <strong>of</strong> an ensemble<br />
<strong>of</strong> quantum dots to be typically 2 orders-<strong>of</strong>-magnitude larger<br />
than that <strong>of</strong> a single dot.",' While relatively narrow photoluminescence<br />
linewidths, on the order <strong>of</strong> 20-30 meV, have<br />
recently been reported, these results have not been achieved<br />
by reducing the size inhomogeneity. Rather, the narrow linewidths<br />
have been cleverly achieved by either growing large<br />
dots, leading to decreased sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the emission energy<br />
to the size <strong>of</strong> the dots, or by growing layers <strong>of</strong> dots and<br />
enhancing carrier tunneling to the biggest neighbor prior tc)<br />
recombination. '"I3<br />
Even with the difficulty <strong>of</strong> the size inhomogeneity, significant<br />
applications have been demonstrated using quantum<br />
dots as active layers and recombination centers. These include<br />
light emitting diodes (LEDS)" and room teinperaturc<br />
lasers oscillating at 1.3 pnl using either thc classical cdgc<br />
emitting design1' or the VCSEL configuration.'%ore recently,<br />
lasing from excited states has been evidenced."<br />
Other demonstrated applications use the confinement enhanced<br />
optical nonlinearity for inidinfrared second and thirdharmonic<br />
enhanced carrier trapping efficiency<br />
for photorefraction20 and the mid- and far-infrared<br />
~onductivity''.~~ for the fabrication <strong>of</strong> quantum dot infrared<br />
photodetectors.23-25 In some cases some very tantalizing<br />
suggestions to make use <strong>of</strong> the size inhomogeneity may even<br />
lead to applications.2h<br />
During the last several years research carried out on<br />
quantum dot structures in 111-V seniiconductors has focused<br />
on Stranski-Krastanov (SK) growth inodcs. The SK growth<br />
Inode takes place during the growth <strong>of</strong> lattice-mismatched<br />
systems and has been shown to produce narrow size distributions<br />
<strong>of</strong> 3D isla~lds. For this growth mode, i.e., small interface<br />
energy but large lattice mismatch, initial growth is<br />
layer by layer. As a result, deposited materials first fosnl a<br />
two-dimensional (7D) wctting laycr on the substrate. As material<br />
continues to be deposited it is energetically favorable<br />
for material to add to the step edges <strong>of</strong> the 2D islands as<br />
opposed to adding to the top to begin 3D island formation. In<br />
this way, the 2D islands grow laterally in size. However, this<br />
is done at energy cost as the strain energy continues to increase<br />
due to the lattice n~isn~atch. Soon it bccomcs cnergeti-<br />
@ 2001 American Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Physics</strong><br />
Downloaded 09 Mar 2008 to 130.184.237.6. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http:lljap.aip.orgljaplcopyright.jsp