æ²æ» 罪è¡å§å¡æFight Crime Committee - ä¿å®å±
æ²æ» 罪è¡å§å¡æFight Crime Committee - ä¿å®å±
æ²æ» 罪è¡å§å¡æFight Crime Committee - ä¿å®å±
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 10<br />
WORK OF DISTRICT FIGHT CRIME COMMITTEES<br />
10.1 DFCCs were established in September 1976, mainly for the purpose<br />
of promoting public awareness of the Fight <strong>Crime</strong> Campaign through organising<br />
activities at the district level. Since then, DFCCs have developed into a focal<br />
point for community efforts to fight crime and their terms of reference (see<br />
Appendix C(a)) have been broadened to include –<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
monitoring the state of crime and law enforcement in the<br />
district;<br />
co-ordinating district campaign activities;<br />
promoting good relationship between the Police and<br />
members of the public; and<br />
advising the FCC on administrative and community<br />
involvement measures to combat crimes.<br />
10.2 There are 18 DFCCs based on the same geographical boundaries as<br />
the District Councils. DFCCs are independent of District Councils, but the two<br />
are closely related in terms of membership and funding arrangements.<br />
Membership<br />
10.3 DFCCs have an average size of 38 members. Chaired by local<br />
community leaders, DFCCs comprise non-official members drawn from all<br />
sectors of the local community and representatives from key local government<br />
offices. In 2009-10, 536 non-official members, many of whom were District<br />
Council members, served on the 18 DFCCs. The membership lists of the 18<br />
DFCCs are at Appendix C(b).<br />
Monitoring <strong>Crime</strong> Situation in the District<br />
10.4 In 2009, each DFCC met every two or three months to discuss law<br />
and order issues in the district. They kept under constant review the state of<br />
crime and significant trends revealed in district crime statistics. The meetings<br />
provided a useful forum for district personalities to discuss local crime issues.<br />
10.5 Each district has its own crime characteristics due to geographical,<br />
demographic and developmental differences. In 2009, DFCCs’ attention was<br />
particularly drawn to the following crimes –<br />
122