28.01.2015 Views

What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? - PSD

What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? - PSD

What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? - PSD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from the ERS<br />

Supporting<br />

<strong>Good</strong><br />

Teaching<br />

Series<br />

<strong>What</strong> <strong>Does</strong> <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Math</strong><br />

<strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>Like</strong><br />

Research-based knowledge about mathematics education has<br />

increased dramatically in recent years, contributing greatly to our understanding<br />

of effective mathematics instruction. While a variety of instructional<br />

strategies and methods has been found to improve student<br />

achievement, a general theme predominates throughout the research:<br />

high-quality mathematics instruction requires good teaching.<br />

This issue in the Supporting <strong>Good</strong> Teaching series looks at the mathematics<br />

skills students need to develop, the instructional techniques that<br />

research indicates are most effective in helping students develop these<br />

skills, and the key role of good teaching.<br />

Balanced <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong><br />

<strong>What</strong> is the most effective method for helping students learn mathematics<br />

While this question has been—and continues to be—the subject of<br />

debate, standards developed by the National Council of Teachers of<br />

<strong>Math</strong>ematics (NCTM) advocate approaches that are more consistent<br />

with the developmental needs of children than traditional mathematics<br />

instruction.<br />

The two teaching approaches are clearly different. For example, in traditional<br />

mathematics instruction, teachers focus on computation and recall<br />

of facts. In the second approach, teachers encourage students to<br />

explain how they arrived at a solution and to consider more than one<br />

way of solving a problem.<br />

Ideally, teachers should strive for a balance between the two approaches<br />

by teaching procedural competence within a mathematics curriculum<br />

promoting conceptual understanding and knowledge construction. By<br />

providing a mixture of experiences that encourage computational, conceptual,<br />

and strategic competence skills, teachers can help more of their<br />

students achieve proficiency in mathematics.<br />

Sequencing of Skills and Knowledge<br />

For mathematics instruction to be effective, topics must be presented in<br />

a sequence and manner appropriate for the developmental level of the<br />

students (Reys et al. 1999). Although the rate at which children develop<br />

“First and foremost,<br />

effective mathematics<br />

provides high-quality<br />

instruction focused<br />

on three important<br />

areas: teaching for<br />

conceptual<br />

understanding,<br />

developing children’s<br />

procedural literacy,<br />

and promoting<br />

strategic competence<br />

through meaningful<br />

problem-solving<br />

investigations”<br />

(Shellard and Moyer<br />

2002, 8).<br />

Issues in the Supporting <strong>Good</strong> Teaching Series are designed to help teachers successfully<br />

address challenges present in every classroom. Each of the issues includes a synthesis of research,<br />

best practice, and questions intended to encourage teacher self-reflection as well as discussion among<br />

school staff members.<br />

© 2004 Educational Research Service


2<br />

Using Research and Best Practice to Support <strong>Good</strong> Teaching<br />

“Research suggests it is not necessary<br />

for teachers to focus first on<br />

skill development and then move<br />

on to problem solving. Both can be<br />

done together. Skills can be developed<br />

on an as-needed basis, or<br />

their development can be supplemented<br />

through the use of technology.<br />

In fact, there is evidence that if<br />

students are initially drilled too<br />

much on isolated skills, they have a<br />

harder time making sense of them<br />

later” (Grouws 2004, 168).<br />

between such processes as addition and multiplication,<br />

and subtraction and division. <strong>Instruction</strong> should<br />

introduce multiplicative reasoning, equivalence, and a<br />

variety of methods for computation. <strong>Instruction</strong> at this<br />

level also should focus on developing children’s interest<br />

in mathematics.<br />

• Middle school students in grades six through eight<br />

are forming conclusions about their mathematical<br />

abilities, interest, and motivation that will influence<br />

how they approach mathematics in later years.<br />

<strong>Instruction</strong> at this level should build on their emerging<br />

capabilities to think hypothetically, comprehend cause<br />

and effect, and reason in both concrete and abstract<br />

terms. Algebra and geometry form a large part of the<br />

recommended curriculum during these years.<br />

• At the high school level, students should be “adept at<br />

visualizing, describing, and analyzing situations in<br />

mathematical terms … they need to be able to justify<br />

and prove mathematically based ideas” (2001,<br />

online). Oftentimes, it is helpful for students at this<br />

developmental level to supplement their fundamental<br />

mathematics knowledge with additional courses,<br />

such as computer science or statistics.<br />

An important key to developmentally appropriate mathematics<br />

instruction, at any age or grade level, is achieving<br />

balance between teaching for conceptual understanding<br />

and teaching for procedural fluency. When<br />

students learn procedures without meaning, they are<br />

really only memorizing discrete pieces of information<br />

that are much more difficult for them to remember.<br />

Students should develop an understanding of the conmathematically<br />

varies from child to child, the NCTM<br />

(2001) has developed a general timeline for students’<br />

mathematical skills development and instruction identified<br />

as appropriate for each level. According to this<br />

timeline:<br />

• From pre-kindergarten through second grade, children<br />

are developing a mathematical foundation by<br />

building beliefs about what mathematics is and what<br />

it means to know and do mathematics. <strong>Instruction</strong><br />

should be provided that helps them understand patterns<br />

and measurement and develop a solid understanding<br />

of the numeration system.<br />

• Building on the inquisitive nature of children in grades<br />

three through five, students should be encouraged to<br />

develop and investigate solutions to everyday problems.<br />

<strong>Instruction</strong> should focus on the relationship<br />

Basic Components of <strong>Math</strong>ematical Literacy<br />

1. Problem solving. Students must learn to solve problems by applying previously learned or<br />

acquired knowledge to new situations.<br />

2. Communicating mathematical ideas. Students need to learn the language and notation used<br />

in mathematics. They should be able to communicate mathematical ideas through the use of<br />

manipulatives, drawings, writing, and speaking.<br />

3. Applying mathematics to everyday situations. Students should be able to translate daily<br />

experiences into mathematical representations, such as graphs, tables, and diagrams, and interpret<br />

and explain the results.<br />

4. Focusing on appropriate computational skills. Students must gain proficiency in using the<br />

following mathematical operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, as well as<br />

with using whole numbers, fractions, and decimals (Mercer and Miller n.d.).


<strong>What</strong> <strong>Does</strong> <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>Like</strong> 3<br />

cepts they are studying before they apply these ideas<br />

to procedural strategies.<br />

To determine readiness, teachers can pose questions<br />

to assess student levels of understanding at different<br />

points during the lesson, before students are asked to<br />

apply skills. <strong>Good</strong> mathematics instruction will ensure<br />

students “see” mathematics as a body of connected<br />

ideas building on one another.<br />

“The student should be the<br />

reference point for addressing the<br />

complex issue of who should learn<br />

what mathematics and when”<br />

(Sutton and Krueger 2002, 4).<br />

Providing <strong>Instruction</strong> for a Range of<br />

Knowledge and Skill Levels<br />

While the research on grouping and tracking for mathematics<br />

instruction is mixed, some studies suggest:<br />

Expectations placed on students differ according<br />

to their assigned ability group or track . . .<br />

[and there are] crucial differences in the kinds of<br />

instruction offered…. <strong>Instruction</strong> in the lower<br />

tracks tends to be fragmented, often requiring<br />

mostly memorization of basic facts and algorithms<br />

and the filling out of worksheets.<br />

Although some higher track classes share these<br />

traits, they are more likely to offer opportunities<br />

for making sense of mathematics, including discussion,<br />

writing, and applying mathematics to<br />

real life situations (Sutton and Krueger 2002, 4).<br />

An alternative, especially in the elementary and middle<br />

grades, is a differentiated approach to instruction. Using<br />

this approach, the teacher makes intensive use of information<br />

gathered through formal and informal assessment—much<br />

of which is embedded in instruction—to<br />

decide which skills and knowledge individual students<br />

need at a specific point in time to help them move<br />

toward competence in a particular standard. Although<br />

ability grouping is used in addition to whole-class instruction,<br />

the groups are fluid and membership changes<br />

often, depending on the specific instruction needed to<br />

move specific students to higher levels of learning.<br />

Effective <strong>Math</strong>ematical Environments<br />

Teachers should work toward improving the effectiveness<br />

of their mathematics instruction by creating classroom<br />

environments that support students’ developing<br />

mathematical skills and nurture their interest in mathematics.<br />

Both teacher behaviors and instructional characteristics<br />

are important.<br />

Teacher Behaviors<br />

In effective classrooms, teachers project a positive attitude<br />

about mathematics, use questioning techniques to<br />

facilitate learning, and encourage students to develop<br />

divergent solutions and inventive ideas for presentation<br />

to and discussion with the whole group.<br />

Acceptance of Students’ Divergent Ideas<br />

Throughout a lesson, the teacher should accept varied<br />

responses from students, challenge them to think more<br />

deeply about the problems they are solving, and ask<br />

them to explain the solutions. An accepting and<br />

encouraging atmosphere is essential so students do<br />

not develop mathematics anxiety. It is important that<br />

teachers’ comments and questions help students<br />

develop confidence in their own abilities to do mathematics.<br />

In addition, discussion helps the student explain<br />

his or her approach to gain an even firmer grasp of the<br />

concept and provides other students with alternative<br />

ways to solve a specific problem.<br />

Teacher Questioning<br />

Teachers can influence learning by posing challenging<br />

and interesting questions. Comments and questions for<br />

students should demonstrate a sound understanding of<br />

the mathematics behind the lesson. Rather than tell<br />

students the answers, teachers should present questions<br />

that stimulate students’ curiosity and encourage<br />

them to investigate further. Teachers may give students<br />

suggestions and hints, and ask additional questions<br />

that lead them to search for different solutions. The<br />

questions should encourage students to rely on one<br />

another and themselves for ideas about mathematics<br />

and problem solving.<br />

Teacher Attitudes<br />

Student motivation and success in mathematics are<br />

greatly influenced by teacher attitude, which should communicate—through<br />

speech and actions—what material is<br />

important and how to learn it. To create an environment<br />

that supports mathematical learning, teachers must communicate<br />

to students that mathematics is an important


4<br />

Using Research and Best Practice to Support <strong>Good</strong> Teaching<br />

activity in which their efforts are valued. A teacher’s attitude<br />

toward mathematics should demonstrate enthusiasm<br />

for the content and a belief that all students are<br />

capable of learning the material, with lessons designed to<br />

encourage curiosity and interest as well as skill building.<br />

<strong>Instruction</strong>al Characteristics<br />

In addition to teacher behaviors, certain instructional<br />

characteristics also are associated with effective mathematics<br />

instruction. By embedding the following<br />

approaches in instruction, teachers can promote student<br />

learning and motivation:<br />

• Students are actively engaged in doing mathematics.<br />

• Students are solving challenging problems.<br />

• Interdisciplinary connections and examples are used<br />

to teach mathematics.<br />

• Students are sharing their mathematical ideas while<br />

working in pairs and groups.<br />

• Students are provided with a variety of opportunities<br />

to communicate mathematically.<br />

• Students are using manipulatives, calculators, and<br />

computers.<br />

Being Actively Engaged in Doing <strong>Math</strong>ematics<br />

Students should not be sitting back watching others<br />

“do mathematics”; rather, everyone should be engaged<br />

in the investigations. This encouragement might take<br />

the form of working on an interesting problem, using<br />

manipulatives to find several solutions to a problem, or<br />

using a computer graphing program to represent mathematical<br />

data. <strong>What</strong> is important is that all students are<br />

involved in finding the solutions.<br />

Solving Challenging Problems<br />

<strong>Math</strong>ematics is a stimulating and interesting field generating<br />

new knowledge every day, and students should<br />

be exposed to this excitement and challenge. Problems<br />

that involve various steps or that model mathematics<br />

problem solving in the real world are more authentic and<br />

meaningful for students. Students should be provided<br />

with opportunities to practice using many different skills<br />

embedded in solving an interesting problem.<br />

Use of Small Groups in <strong>Math</strong>ematics <strong>Instruction</strong><br />

Research findings clearly support the use of small groups as part of mathematics instruction. This<br />

approach can result in increased student learning as measured by traditional achievement measures as<br />

well as other important outcomes, such as improvement in student ability to communicate, resolve differences,<br />

and get along with others. When using small groups for mathematics instruction, teachers should:<br />

• Choose tasks dealing with important mathematical concepts and ideas.<br />

• Select tasks appropriate for group work.<br />

• Consider having students initially work individually on a task and then engage in group work to share<br />

and build on their individual ideas and work.<br />

• Give clear instructions to the groups, and set clear expectations for each group.<br />

• Emphasize both group goals and individual accountability—for example, indicate that an individual<br />

from each group will report for the group, but withhold his or her name until group work has been<br />

completed.<br />

• Choose tasks students find interesting.<br />

• Ensure the group work has closure, where key ideas and methods are brought to the surface either<br />

by the teacher, the students, or both.<br />

Finally, as several research studies have shown, teachers should not think of small groups as an approach<br />

that must always be used or never be used. Rather, small-group instruction should be seen as an appropriate<br />

instructional practice for certain learning objectives, and as an approach that can work well with<br />

other organizational arrangements, including whole-class instruction (adapted from Grouws 2004).


<strong>What</strong> <strong>Does</strong> <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>Like</strong> 5<br />

In addition, students should be asked to do more than<br />

the application of mathematical procedures. Research<br />

that compares the way in which mathematics is typically<br />

taught in many U.S. classrooms with the approach<br />

used in other countries with higher mathematics<br />

achievement suggests U.S. students should be provided<br />

with more opportunities to “make connections.” For<br />

example, “in asking students to solve for x in the equation<br />

2x+3=11, teachers might also have asked if it<br />

would be acceptable to divide each side by a specific<br />

number, changing the process from a simple use of<br />

procedure to a more complex examination” of the<br />

problem (Association for Supervision and Curriculum<br />

Development 2003, online).<br />

Using Interdisciplinary Connections and Examples<br />

Using literature as a springboard to mathematical investigation<br />

is a useful way to introduce a problem in context<br />

and encourage meaningful mathematics investigations.<br />

A mathematics investigation placed in the context<br />

of a story provides an authentic problem-solving situation,<br />

sometimes with “messy” results that model realworld<br />

problems. This engages students in connecting<br />

the language of mathematical ideas with numerical representations<br />

and develops important skills that support<br />

students’ abilities to solve word problems. Teachers<br />

may also connect mathematics with other content<br />

areas in the school curriculum, such as science, social<br />

studies, or language arts, to show its relevance to<br />

problem solving in different disciplines.<br />

Providing Opportunities for Group Work<br />

Research shows students who work in groups on<br />

problems, assignments, and other mathematical investigations<br />

display increased achievement. Opportunities<br />

for students to work in pairs and small groups give<br />

them the chance to share their ideas and solution<br />

routes with peers. As students listen to and talk with<br />

one another, they begin to see mathematical relationships<br />

that build on their previous notions and conjectures.<br />

Giving an explanation to a peer is also positively<br />

related to increased student achievement.<br />

Allowing Opportunities for Student Communication<br />

During a lesson, students should have many opportunities<br />

to communicate their ideas. They may draw their<br />

ideas in pictures or write them in mathematics journals.<br />

After students work on a challenging problem, the<br />

teacher should ask individuals or groups to share their<br />

solution routes by presenting them on chart paper or a<br />

transparency. Whole-class discussions, which are effective<br />

for sharing and explaining solutions, give students a<br />

chance to challenge and evaluate the validity of other<br />

students’ ideas in an environment of respect and<br />

understanding.<br />

Using Manipulatives<br />

The long-term use of mathematics manipulatives is<br />

positively related to student achievement and attitudes<br />

about mathematics. It is not enough, however, to simply<br />

provide students with manipulatives: they must be<br />

taught how to use these materials. When used correctly,<br />

manipulatives are “conducive to the concrete kinds<br />

of learning that lay a sufficient foundation for abstract<br />

thought” (Ross and Kurtz 1993, 256).<br />

Several steps can be taken to ensure students benefit<br />

from a lesson involving manipulatives. First, the teacher<br />

must make certain the manipulatives support the lesson’s<br />

objectives. Second, before allowing students to<br />

handle the materials, the teacher must demonstrate use<br />

of the manipulatives and procedures for handling them.<br />

And third, the lesson design must support the active<br />

participation of all students (Ross and Kurtz 1993).<br />

Teachers should provide students with a wide variety of<br />

manipulative materials for use in mathematics activities.<br />

Students should use manipulatives to represent mathematics<br />

in concrete form, and then proceed to using pictorial<br />

models and abstract symbols. There should be<br />

items for drawing and writing about mathematics during<br />

problem solving, as well as geometric shapes and other<br />

materials for building and exploring.<br />

Using Calculators and Technology<br />

Another important tool for the mathematics classroom<br />

is technology. As with manipulatives, the way a teacher<br />

uses technological tools determines the tools’ effectiveness<br />

for conveying mathematical ideas. The computer<br />

environment provides many visual representations—<br />

graphs, diagrams, geometric figures, and moving<br />

images. The sheer graphic power of technological tools<br />

allows students to explore and manipulate many different<br />

visual representations of mathematical models.<br />

Virtual manipulatives are now available for investigating<br />

the characteristics of geometric shapes (Moyer,<br />

Bolyard, and Spikell 2002). A child as young as kindergarten<br />

age can explore complex repeating patterns<br />

using virtual manipulatives on the computer screen.<br />

Because technology use is one key to language and<br />

mathematical literacy, students need different opportunities<br />

to learn to use it effectively as a learning tool.


6<br />

Using Research and Best Practice to Support <strong>Good</strong> Teaching<br />

National Council of Supervisors of <strong>Math</strong>ematics: Components of Essential <strong>Math</strong>ematics<br />

1. Problem Solving. Learning to solve problems is the principal reason for studying mathematics. Problem solving<br />

is the process of applying previously acquired knowledge to new and unfamiliar situations. Solving word problems<br />

in texts is one form of problem solving, but students also should be faced with non-text problems.<br />

2. Communicating <strong>Math</strong>ematical Ideas. Students should learn the language and notation of mathematics. For<br />

example, they should understand place value and scientific notation. They should learn to receive mathematical<br />

ideas through listening, reading, and visualizing. They should be able to present mathematical ideas by speaking,<br />

writing, drawing pictures and graphs, and demonstrating with concrete models. They should be able to discuss<br />

and ask questions about mathematics.<br />

3. <strong>Math</strong>ematical Reasoning. Students should learn to make independent investigations of mathematical ideas.<br />

They should be able to identify and extend patterns and use experiences and observations to make conjectures<br />

(tentative conclusions). They should be able to distinguish between valid and invalid arguments.<br />

4. Applying <strong>Math</strong>ematics to Everyday Situations. Students should be encouraged to translate everyday situations<br />

into mathematical representations (graphs, tables, diagrams, or mathematical expressions), process the<br />

mathematics, and interpret the results in light of the initial situation. They should be able to solve ratio, proportion,<br />

percent, direct variation, and inverse variation problems. Students should see how mathematics is applied in the<br />

real world, as well as observe how mathematics grows from the world around them.<br />

5. Alertness to the Reasonableness of Results. In solving problems, students should question the reasonableness<br />

of a solution or conjecture in relation to the original problem. Students must develop number sense to determine<br />

if results of calculations are reasonable in relation to the original numbers and the operations used. With<br />

society’s increasing use of calculating devices, this capability is more important than ever.<br />

6. Estimation. Students should be able to carry out rapid approximate calculations by using mental arithmetic and<br />

various computational estimation techniques. Students should acquire simple methods for estimating measurements<br />

such as length, area, volume, and mass (weight). They should be able to decide when a particular result is<br />

precise enough for the purpose at hand.<br />

7. Appropriate Computational Skills. Students should gain facility in using addition, subtraction, multiplication,<br />

and division with whole numbers and decimals. In learning to apply computation, students should have practice in<br />

choosing the appropriate computational method: mental arithmetic, paper-pencil algorithm, or calculating device.<br />

8. Algebraic Thinking. Students should learn to use variables (letters) to represent mathematical quantities and<br />

expressions, and they should be able to represent mathematical functions and relationships using tables, graphs,<br />

and equations. They should understand and correctly use positive and negative numbers, order of operations, formulas,<br />

equations, and inequalities. They should recognize the ways in which one quantity changes in relation to<br />

another.<br />

9. Measurement. Students should learn the fundamental concepts of measurement through concrete experiences.<br />

They should be able to measure distance, mass (weight), time, capacity, temperature, and angles. They should<br />

learn to calculate simple perimeters, areas, and volumes. They should be able to perform measurement in both<br />

metric and customary systems using the appropriate tools and levels of precision.<br />

10. Geometry. Students should understand the geometric concepts necessary to function effectively in the threedimensional<br />

world. They should have knowledge of concepts such as parallelism, perpendicularity, congruence,<br />

similarity, and symmetry. Students should know properties of simple plane and solid geometric figures.<br />

11. Statistics. Students should plan and carry out the collection and organization of data to answer questions in their<br />

everyday lives. Students should know how to construct, read, and draw conclusions from simple tables, maps,<br />

charts, and graphs. They should be able to present information about numerical data such as measure of central<br />

tendency (mean, median, mode) and measures of dispersion (range, deviation). Students should recognize the<br />

basic uses and misuses of statistical representation and inference.<br />

12. Probability. Students should understand elementary notions of probability to determine the likelihood of future<br />

events. They should become familiar with how mathematics is used to help predict election results, business forecasts,<br />

and outcomes of sporting events. They should learn how probability applies to research results and to the<br />

decision-making process (excerpted from National Council of Supervisors of <strong>Math</strong>ematics 1989, 44-46).


<strong>What</strong> <strong>Does</strong> <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>Like</strong> 7<br />

Calculator use in early-grades mathematics instruction<br />

has caused great debate within the mathematics community<br />

and among the general public (Battista 1994;<br />

Calvert 1999; Goldenberg 2000; Mercer 1992).<br />

Calculator use can affect not only how students learn but<br />

also what they learn. As with other mathematics tools, it<br />

is how the tool is used for teaching and learning—not<br />

the tool itself—that causes the debate. Advocates for<br />

calculator use in the early grades propose students use<br />

calculators in school mathematics to explore patterns<br />

and relationships with numbers. For example, young children<br />

can examine patterns among very large numbers<br />

with the support of a calculator or create a graph of a<br />

large data set using graphing programs.<br />

This does not mean that students should use calculators<br />

when they are working to develop computational<br />

fluency. During problem solving or when working with<br />

large numbers, however, calculators can be used to<br />

relieve the burden of complex computations and to<br />

help students focus on the concepts being presented.<br />

Opportunities to use calculators as part of the curriculum<br />

throughout the year help students to recognize<br />

when calculator use is appropriate.<br />

<strong>Good</strong> Teaching Is Key<br />

Of course, effective mathematics instruction begins<br />

with effective teaching. No lesson, no matter how well<br />

planned, can be successful if the elements of effective<br />

teaching are not in place. Douglas Grouws, editor of<br />

the Handbook of Research on <strong>Math</strong>ematics Teaching<br />

and Learning and author of the mathematics chapter in<br />

Handbook of Research on Improving Student<br />

Achievement, discusses instructional practices identified<br />

by research as having a positive impact on student<br />

learning and then mentions the role of the teacher:<br />

The quality of the implementation of a teaching<br />

practice also greatly influences its impact on<br />

student learning. The value of using manipulative<br />

materials to investigate a concept, for<br />

example, depends not only on whether manipulatives<br />

are used, but also on how they are used<br />

with the students. Similarly, small-group instruction<br />

will benefit students only if the teacher<br />

knows when and how to use this teaching<br />

practice (2004, 162).<br />

Finally, effective teachers of mathematics must be<br />

effective teachers overall, exhibiting effective classroom<br />

management skills, especially in classrooms using differentiated<br />

instruction; actively engaging their students;<br />

and making efficient use of instructional time. A mathematics<br />

lesson cannot succeed if the other elements of<br />

teaching—classroom management, a logical progression<br />

of lessons, an effective use of assessment, and<br />

time management—are not in place.<br />

References<br />

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2003,<br />

October). International comparisons of mathematics instruction.<br />

Research Brief. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.ascd.org/publications/researchbrief/volume1/v1n21.html<br />

Battista, M.T. (1994). Calculators and computers: Tools for mathematical<br />

exploration and empowerment. Arithmetic Teacher (March<br />

1994), 412-417.<br />

Calvert, L.G. (1999). A dependence on technology and algorithms<br />

or a lack of number sense Teaching Children <strong>Math</strong>ematics<br />

(September 1999), 6-7.<br />

Goldenberg, E.P. (2000). Thinking (and talking) about technology in<br />

mathematics classrooms. Newton, MA: The K-12 <strong>Math</strong>ematics<br />

Curriculum Center, Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved<br />

from http://www2.edc.org/mcc/iss_tech.pdf<br />

Grouws, D.A. (2004). Chapter 7. <strong>Math</strong>ematics. In G. Cawelti (Ed.),<br />

Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement (3rd edition),<br />

162-181. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.<br />

Mercer, J. (1992). <strong>What</strong> is left to teach if students can use calculators<br />

The <strong>Math</strong>ematics Teacher (September 1992), 415-417.<br />

Mercer, C.D., & Miller, S.P. (n.d.). Teaching students with learning<br />

problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic facts.<br />

Retrieved from<br />

http://www.enc.org/print/professional/learn/equity/articles/document.shtminput=ACQ-111397-1397_1<br />

Moyer, P.S., Bolyard, J.J., & Spikell, M.A. (2002). <strong>What</strong> are virtual<br />

manipulatives Teaching Children <strong>Math</strong>ematics (February 2002),<br />

372-377.<br />

National Council of Supervisors of <strong>Math</strong>ematics. (1989). Essential<br />

mathematics for the 21st century. Arithmetic Teacher (September<br />

1989), 44-46.<br />

National Council of Teachers of <strong>Math</strong>ematics (NCTM). (2001).<br />

Principals and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.nctm.org/standards/overview.htm<br />

Reys, R.E., Suydam, M.N., Lindquist, M.M., & Smith, N.L. (1999).<br />

Helping children learn mathematics (5th edition). New York: John<br />

Wiley and Sons, Inc.<br />

Ross, R., & Kurtz, R. (1993). Making manipulatives work: A strategy<br />

for success. Arithmetic Teacher (January 1993), 254-257.<br />

Shellard, E., & Moyer, P.S. (2002). <strong>What</strong> principals need to know<br />

about teaching math. Alexandria, VA: National Association of<br />

Elementary School Principals and Educational Research Service.<br />

Sutton, J., & Krueger, A. (2002). EDThoughts: <strong>What</strong> we know about<br />

mathematics teaching and learning. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent<br />

Research for Education and Learning.


8<br />

<strong>What</strong> <strong>Does</strong> <strong>Good</strong> <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>Like</strong><br />

Questions for Discussion and Reflection<br />

• How do you ensure your students truly understand the math concepts they are studying rather than<br />

merely memorizing procedures Share and discuss any specific techniques with your colleagues.<br />

• Revisit the section titled “Effective <strong>Math</strong>ematical Environments” and glance through the section subheadings.<br />

Are your personal teaching behaviors and instructional characteristics consistent with<br />

those recommended How might you improve the environment in your classroom<br />

• Discuss the information from the National Council of Supervisors of <strong>Math</strong>ematics provided in the<br />

text with your colleagues. Do you consider the components listed when developing lesson plans<br />

The following ERS Info-Files are related resources available from<br />

ERS. These resources provide an overview of research and information<br />

to give you a general understanding of a particular topic or<br />

concern in K-12 education. Each Info-File contains 70-100 pages<br />

of articles from professional journals, summaries of research<br />

studies and related literature, and an annotated bibliography<br />

that includes an ERIC-CIJE search. Base cost-recovery price<br />

per title: $40. Subscriber discounts are available.<br />

<strong>Math</strong> Manipulatives and Calculators (#NT-5180)<br />

Describes the use of concrete objects (manipulatives) to teach<br />

mathematical concepts. Includes suggestions for materials and<br />

use. Discusses the rationale for using calculators to teach mathematical<br />

concepts.<br />

Problem Solving in <strong>Math</strong> and Science (#NT-5292)<br />

Reviews effective methods and strategies for teaching problem<br />

solving in grades K-12. Materials include ideas for activities, as well<br />

as grading methods.<br />

Grouping for <strong>Math</strong> <strong>Instruction</strong> (#NT-5306)<br />

Assesses ability grouping in math instruction and the effects of<br />

tracking in math classes. Offers alternative grouping formats and<br />

presents guidelines for forming effective small groups to promote<br />

peer interaction and group problem solving.<br />

To order, contact ERS at the address below. Add the greater of<br />

$4.50 or 10 percent of the total price for postage and handling.<br />

Phone and online orders accepted with purchase order number<br />

or Visa, MasterCard, or American Express.<br />

Educational Research Service is the nonprofit research foundation<br />

that for 30 years has provided education leaders with objective,<br />

reliable K-12 research and information. Contact ERS to learn how<br />

you can benefit from the online and print services and resources<br />

available through an annual subscription. Or visit us online at<br />

www.ers.org for an overview of the wealth of K-12 resources<br />

available from ERS.<br />

Purchasers of the Supporting <strong>Good</strong> Teaching Series CD-ROM<br />

are granted permission to make print copies of each item for<br />

distribution to school and district staff. The content must be used<br />

in the format provided. The content cannot be excerpted for use<br />

in another publication or newsletter. In addition, the materials may<br />

not be resold or used as a handout for programs for which a fee<br />

is charged.<br />

ERS Supporting <strong>Good</strong> Teaching Staff:<br />

Jennifer Turner, Research Specialist<br />

Elizabeth Shellard, Senior Research Specialist<br />

Nancy Protheroe, Director of Special Research Projects<br />

Jeanne Chircop, Manager, Editorial Services<br />

ERS Management Staff:<br />

John M. Forsyth, Ph.D., President and Director of Research<br />

Katherine A. Behrens, Senior Director, Marketing and<br />

Member Services<br />

Patrick R. Murphy, Senior Director, Finance and Administration<br />

The ERS Board of Directors is composed of the executive directors<br />

of the seven national founding organizations:<br />

• American Association of School Administrators<br />

• American Association of School Personnel Administrators<br />

• Association of School Business Officials International<br />

• Council of Chief State School Officers<br />

• National Association of Elementary School Principals<br />

• National Association of Secondary School Principals<br />

• National School Public Relations Association<br />

Educational Research Service<br />

2000 Clarendon Boulevard • Arlington, VA 22201-2908<br />

Tel: (800) 791-9308 • Fax: (800) 791-9309<br />

Email: ers@ers.org • Web site: www.ers.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!