PERSONALIA ANALYSES GENERAL Barnes ... - Kinship Studies

ANALYSES
GENERAL
PERSONALIA
Barnes, John A.
1971. Three Styles in the Study of Kinship. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of
California Press. [Murdock, Lévi-Strauss and Fortes.]
Reviews: Berndt 1971b; Bloch 1972b; Rivière 1972b; Scheffler 1972c; Keesing 1973;
Sousberghe 1973b.
Murphy, Robert F.
1980. Robert Lowie, Julian Steward and Neo-Evolutionism. Journal of the Steward
Anthropological Society 11 (2): 141-163. [Amply on kinship studies by these two.]
COMPARATIVE/CONTRASTIVE
D’Aquili, Eugene.
HAVE
1975. The Influence of Jung on the Work of Claude Lévi-Strauss. Journal of the History
of Behavioral Sciences 11 (1): 41-48. [Pp. 46-47: on the parallelism between Jung’s and
Lévi-Strauss’s interpretations of moieties and cross-cousin marriage.]
Díaz Pérez, Juan C.
1996. Lévi-Strauss y Bourdieu: Estructuras de parentesco y estrategias matrimoniales. In
Cultura y Communicación: Edmund Leach in Memoriam, edited by Jesús Jáuregui, María
E. Olavarría y Victor M. Franco Pellotier. Pp. 187-192. México: Centro de
Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, Universidad Autónoma
Metropolitana-Unidad Iztapalapa.
Dombrowski, Gisela.
1976. Sozialwissenschaft und Gesellschaft bei Durkheim und Radcliffe-Brown. Berlin:
Duncker und Humblot. 162 S.
Review: Löffler 1978.
Dörmann, Johannes.
1968-1969. Bachofen - Morgan. Anthropos 63-64 (1-2): 129-138.
Douglas, Mary.
HAVE
2000. Memory and Selective Attention: Bartlett and Evans-Pritchard. In Bartlett, Culture
and Cognition, edited by Akiko Saito. Pp. 179-193. Cambridge: Psychology Press.
[Remembering the dead, remembering degrees of kinship.]
Fortes, Meyer.
1958. Malinowski and Freud. Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Review 45: 127-145.
Gardner, Helen.
2009. ‘By the Facts We Add to Our Store’: Lorimer Fison, Lewis Henry Morgan and the
Spread of Kinship Studies in Australia. Oceania 79 (3): 280-292. [Cross-listed in
AUSTRALIA-INDIGENOUS.]
Hiatt, Lester R.
1985. Maidens, Males, and Marx: Some Contrasts in the Work of Frederick Rose and
Claude Meillassoux. Oceania 56 (1): 34-46.

Nutini, Hugo G.
1965. Some Considerations on the Nature of Social Structure and Model Building: A
Critique of Claude Lévi-Strauss and Edmund Leach. American Anthropologist 67 (3):
707-731.
Reprinted in: Claude Levi-Strauss: The Anthropologist as Hero, edited by E. Nelson
Hayes and Tanya Hayes. Pp. 70-107. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 1970.
Riles, A.
1994. Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of
Interdisciplinarity. University of Illinois Law Review (1994): 597-650. [On Maine vs.
Leach.]
Rivière, Peter.
HAVE
1995. William Robertson Smith and John Ferguson McLennan: The Aberdeen Roots of
British Social Anthropology. In William Robertson Smith: Essays in Reassessment, edited
by William Johnstone. Pp. 293-302. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Schneider, David M.
1968. Rivers and Kroeber in the Study of Kinship. In Kinship and Social Organization,
by W. H. R. Rivers. Pp. 7-16. London: Athlone Press.
Strathern, Andrew, and Pamela J. Stewart.
HAVE
2010. Kinship, Ritual, Cosmos. Journal de la Société des Océanistes 130-131: 79-88.
[Different takes on a Freudian Oedipal interpretation of tribal kinship structures by
Juillerat for Yafar and Fortes for Tallensi. Cross-listed in ANCESTOR-COSMOLOGY
and GENERAL-PSYCHOLOGY.]
Tobolka, Radim.
HAVE
2003. Gellner and Geertz in Morocco: A Segmentary Debate. Social Evolution and
History 2 (2): 88-117. [Cross-listed in AFROASIATIC.]
COLLECTIONS of ESSAYS
BACHOFEN, JOHANN J.
(see Hildebrandt 1988, for complete bibliography)
Heinrichs, Hans-Jürgen. (ed.)
1987. Das Mutterrecht von Johann Jakob Bachofen in der Diskussion. Frankfurt am
Main: Qumran im Campus-Verl.
Review: Hildebrandt 1989.
GENERAL
Borgeaud, Ph.
1994-1995. La mère des dieux et Bachofen en Grèce ancienne. Mètis 9-10: 293-297.
[Cross-listed in INDo-EUROPEAN.]
Dörmann, Johannes.
1966. Bachofens ‘Antiquarische Briefe’ und die zweite Bearbeitung des ‘Mutterrechts’.
In Johann Jakob Bachofens Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 8. Ss. 523-602. Basel and Stuttgart:

Schwabe.
Evola, Julius.
1949. Il matriarcato nell’opera di J.J. Bachofen. In Le Madri e la Virilità Olimpica, para
Johann Jakob Bachofen. Vicenza: Gualandi.
Gossmann, Lionel.
1984. Basle, Bachofen and the Critique of Modernity in the Second Half of the
Nineteenth Century. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 47: 136-185.
Gossmann, Lionel.
1983. Orpheus Philologus: Bachofen versus Mommsen on the Study of Antiquity.
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 73 (5): 1-89.
Kelles-Krauz, Casimir de.
1902. J. J. Bachofen. Aus den Studien über die Quelle des Marxismus. Neue Zeit 20 (1):
517-524.
Lommel, Herman.
1966. Zur indischen Sagenwelt in Bachofens ‘Antiquarische Briefen’. In Johann Jakob
Bachofens Gesammelte Werke. Bd. 8. Ss. 603-630. Basel and Stuttgart: Schwabe.
[Includes discussion of avunculate.]
Rattner, Josef, and Gerhard Danzer.
2003. Johann Jakob Bachofen und die Mutterrechtstheorie. Europäische Kulturbeiträge
im Deutsch-Schweizerischen Schrifttum von 1850-2000. Pp. 9-28. Würzburg:
Königshausen & Neumann.
Stagl, Justin.
1990. Johann Jakob Bachofen, “Das Mutterrecht” und die Folgen. Anthropos 85 (1-3):
11-37.
Wesel, Uwe.
1980. Der Mythos vom Matriarchat: Über Bachofens Mutterrecht und die Stellung von
Frauen in Frühen Gesellschaften vor der Entstehung Staatlicher Herrschaft. Frankfurt
am Main: Suhrkamp
BANDELIER, ADOLPH E.
Waterman, T. T.
1917. Bandelier’s Contribution to the Study of Ancient Mexican Social Organization.
University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 12 (7):
249-282.
BERNDT, RONALD M.
Morphy, Howard.
HAVE
2009. Re-Reading Ronald Berndt: Exploring the Depths of his Yolngu Ethnography.
Anthropological Forum 19 (1): 73-97. [Kinship, social organization and myth. Crosslisted
in AUSTRALIAN.]
OBITUARY

Morphy, Howard.
1990. Ronald Murray Berndt 1916-1990. Anthropology Today: 22-23.
BOURDIEU, PIERRE.
Bensa, Alban.
2003. L'exclu de la famille. La parenté selon Pierre Bourdieu. Actes de la Recherche en
Sciences Sociales 150 (1): 19-26.
Lamaison, Pierre.
1986. From Rules to Strategies: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural
Anthropology 1 (1): 110-120.
OBITUARY
Wacquant, Loic.
2002. Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002). American Anthropologist 105 (2): 478-480.
BOWEN, MURRAY
Berenson, David.
1976. An Interview with Murray Bowen. The Family 3: 50-62.
Reprinted in: Family Therapy in Clinical Practice, by Murray Bowen. Pp. 389-412.
Lanham, etc.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1985.
DARWIN, CHARLES
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian.
HAVE
2004. The Geography of Descent. (Radcliffe-Brown Lecture in Social Anthropology,
2003). Proceedings of the British Academy 125: 311-364.
OBITUARIES
DOLE, GERTRUDE E.
Barnes, Monica.
HAVE
2003. Gertrude Evelyn Dole (1915–2001). American Anthropologist 105 (2): 484-486.
Chernela, Janet.
2002. Obituary of Gertrude Dole. Anthropology News, May: 33.
DUMONT, LOUIS
Assayag, Jackie.
1998. La construction de l’objet en anthropologie. L’indianisme et le comparatisme de
Louis Dumont. L’Homme 38: 165-189. [Including his work on kinship.]
Khan, Hussain C.G.
1987. Dumont and Dravidian Kinship. In Religion and Society in South India: A Volume
in Honour of Prof. N. Subba Reddy, edited by V. Sudarsen, G. Prakash Reddy and M.
Suryanarayana. Pp. 221-243. Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation.

Madan, Triloki N.
1981. For a Sociology of India. Contributions to Indian Sociology 15 (1-2): 405-418.
[Discussion of Dumont’s contributions, with some reference to his study of South Indian
kinship.]
Tharakan, C. George.
HAVE
2006. Louis Dumont and the Essence of Dravidian Kinship Terminology: The Case of
Muduga. Journal of Anthropological Research 62 (3): 321-346. [Cross-listed in
DRAVIDIAN.]
OBITUARIES
Allen, Nick J.
1998. Obituary: Louis Dumont (1911-1998). Journal of the Anthropological Society of
Oxford 29 (1): 1-4.
Madan, Triloki N.
HAVE
1999. Louis Dumont (1911-1998): A Memoir. Contributions to Indian Sociology 33 (3):
473-501.
DURKHEIM, ÉMILE
Besnard, Philippe.
HAVE
1997. Mariage et suicide: la theorie durkheimienne de la regulation conjugale a l'epreuve
d'un siecle. Revue Française de Sociologie 38 (4): 735-758.
Bynder, Herbert.
HAVE
1969. Émile Durkheim and the Sociology of the Family. Journal of Marriage and the
Family 31 (3): 527-533.
Kuper, Adam.
HAVE
1985. Durkheim’s Theory of Primitive Kinship. British Journal of Sociology 36 (2): 224-
237.
Lamanna, Mary A.
2001. Emile Durkheim on the Family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maybury-Lewis, David.
HAVE
1965. Durkheim on Relationship Systems. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 4
(2): 253-260.
OBITUARIES
ELKIN, ADOLPHUS P.
Reay, Marie.
1979a. A. P. Elkin (1891-1979) and Anthropology. Canberra Anthropology 2 (2): 1-6.
Reay, Marie.
1979b. A. P. Elkin (1891-1979): A Personal Memoir. Aboriginal History 3 (1): 88-90.
Ember, Carol R.
EMBER, MELVIN

2011. What We Know and What We Don’t Know About Variation in Social
Organization: Melvin Ember’s Approach to the Study of Kinship. Cross-Cultural
Research 45 (1): 16-36.
EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E.
McKinnon, Susan.
HAVE
2000. Domestic Exceptions: Evans-Pritchard and the Creation of Nuer Patrilineality and
Equality. Cultural Anthropology 15 (1): 35-83. [Cross-listed in NILO-SAHARAN.]
FEDOROV, NIKOLAY F.
Berdyaev, Nicholas.
1950. N. F. Fedorov. Russian Review 9 (2): 124-130. [Cross-listed in PHILOSOPHY.]
FORTES, MEYER
Drucker-Brown, Susan.
HAVE
1989. Notes toward a Biography of Meyer Fortes. American Ethnologist 16 (2): 375-385.
Firth, Raymond.
1983. Meyer Fortes: An Appreciation. Cambridge Anthropology 8 (2): 52-68. (Special
Issue: “In Memory of Meyer Fortes.”)
Parkin, Robert J.
1997. Meyer Fortes. In The Dictionary of Anthropology, edited by Thomas Barfield. Pp.
205-206. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zangwill, Oliver.
HAVE
1992. Meyer Fortes (April 25, 1906-January 27, 1983). Proceedings of the American
Philosophical Society 136 (1): 128-131.
FREUD, SIGMUND
Rizzuto, Ana-Maria.
1976. Freud, God, the Devil and the Theory of Object Representation. International
Review of Psychoanalysis 3: 165-180. [On the role of kinship in Freud’s theory of the
Superego and the role of the father as a source of God.]
FUSTEL de COULANGES, NUMA D.
Humphreys, S. C.
1982. Fustel de Coulanges and the Greek ‘genos’. Sociologia del Dritto 3: 35-44.
GALTON, FRANCIS
Bulmer, Michael.
1999. The Development of Francis Galton’s Ideas on the Mechanism of Heredity.
Journal of the History of Biology 32: 263-292.
Bulmer, Michael.
2003. Francis Galton: Pioneer of Heredity and Biometry. Johns Hopkins University
Press. 352 P.

Cowan, Ruth S.
1985. Sir Francis Galton and the Study of Heredity in the Nineteenth Century. New
York: Garland.
Gillham, Nicholas W.
2001. Sir Francis Galton and the Birth of Genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 35: 83-
101.
Kenna, John C.
1964. Sir Francis Galton’s Contribution to Anthropology. Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute 94 (2): 80-93.
Stigler, Stephen M.
1989. Francis Galton’s Account of the Invention of Correlation. Statistical Science 4 (2):
73-79.
Terman, Lewis M.
1917. The Intelligence Quotient of Francis Galton in Childhood. American Journal of
Psychology 28: 209-215.
OBITUARY
GEFFRAY, CHRISTIAN
Copans, Jean, and Jean-Pierre Dozon.
HAVE
2001. Christian Geffray (1954-2001). Cahiers d'Études Africaines 41 (162): 239-242.
GELLNER, ERNEST
Heady, Patrick.
HAVE
2003. Gellner’s Ideal Kinship Language and the Connection between Biological and
Social Relatedness. Social Evolution and History 2 (2): 75-87.
GLUCKMAN, MAX
Colson, Elizabeth F.
1978. Max Gluckman and the Study of Divorce. In Cross-Examination: Essays in
Memory of Max Gluckman, edited by P. Gulliver. Pp. 15-28. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Frankenberg, Ronald.
HAVE
1981. What Manchester Does Today...: Max Gluckman and the Social Anthropology of
the Practical World. Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter 45: 6-8.
Parkin, Robert J.
1997. Max Gluckman. In The Dictionary of Anthropology, edited by Thomas Barfield.
Pp. 225-227. Oxford: Blackwell.
GODELIER, MAURICE
Eves, Richard.
1991. Ideology, Gender, and Resistance: A Critical Analysis of Godelier’s Theory of
Ideology. Dialectical Anthropology 16 (2): 109-124.

GOODENOUGH, WARD H.
Kronenfeld, David B.
1992-1993. Ethnography and Ethnology: Goodenough vs. Fischer a Generation Later.
Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4 (1): 1-21.
GOODY, JACK
Parkin, Robert J.
1997. Jack Goody. In The Dictionary of Anthropology, edited by Thomas Barfield. Pp.
227-228. Oxford: Blackwell.
GOUGH, KATHLEEN
Mencher, Joan.
1993. Kathleen Gough and Research in Kerala. Anthropologica 25 (1): 195-201. [Pp.
196-198: on Gough’s work on kinship.]
HAGE, PER
Jenkins, David.
HAVE
2008. Anthropology, Mathematics, Kinship: A Tribute to the Anthropologist Per Hage
and His Work with the Mathematician Frank Harary. Human Complex Systems.
Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory. Paper 0708DJ. (Mathematical
Anthropology and Cultural Theory 2 (3)).
Jenkins, David.
2008. Anthropology, Mathematics, and Per Hage’s Contribution to Kinship Theory. In
Kinship, Language and Prehistory: Per Hage and the Renaissance in Kinship Studies,
edited by Doug Jones and Bojka Milicic. Pp. 11-25. Salt Lake City: University of Utah
Press.
Jones, Doug, and Bojka Milicic.
2011. Per Hage and the Renaissance in Kinship Studies. In Kinship, Language and
Prehistory: Per Hage and the Renaissance in Kinship Studies, edited by Doug Jones and
Bojka Milicic. Pp. 3-10. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
OBITUARIES
Marck, Jeff.
HAVE
2004. Im Memoriam: per Hage, 1935-2004. Oceanic Linguistics 45 (2): 491-496. [With a
bibliography of Hage’s works.]
Milicic, Bojka.
2006. In Memoriam. Per Hage (1935-2005). L’Homme 177-178: 409-412.
HAVE
HALLOWELL, A. IRVING.
Hallowell, Irving A.
1972. On Being an Anthropologist. In Crossing Cultural Boundaries: An Anthropological
Experience, edited by Solon T. Kimball and James B. Watson. Pp. 51-62. San
Francisco etc.: Chandler Publishing Company.

Reprinted in: Contributions to Anthropology: Selected Papers of A. Irving Hallowell. Pp.
3-16. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. [Pp. 7-9: “Kinship, culture and
psychology” on Hallowell’s involvement in kinship studies.]
HERITIER, FRANCOISE
Vernier, Bernard.
1996a. Théorie de l’inceste et construction d’objet. Françoise Héritier et les interdits de la
Bible. Social Anthropology 4 (3): 227-250. [Cross-listed in AFROASIATIC.]
Vernier, Bernard.
HAVE
1996b. Théorie de l’inceste et construction d’objet: Françoise Héritier, la Grèce antique et
les Hittites. Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 51 (1): 173-200. [Cross-listed in INDo-
EUROPEAN.]
HOCART, ARTHUR
Quigley, Declan.
1991. Hocart’s Theory of Caste and Kinship. Eastern Anthropologist 44 (4): 315-344.
HOWITT, ALFRED W.
Keen, Ian.
HAVE
2000. The Anthropologist as Geologist: Howitt in Colonial Gippsland. Australian
Journal of Anthropology 11 (1): 78-97.
HYATT, LESTER R.
Hamilton, Annette.
1997. L. R. Hiatt: Life, Thought and Misunderstanding. In Scholar and Skeptic:
Australian Aboriginal Studies in Honour of L. R. Hiatt, edited by Francesca Merlan, John
Morton, and Alan Rumsey. Pp. 1-10. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press. [Pp. 3-4:
Hiatt’s contribution to the study of Australian kinship.]
JOSSELIN DE JONG, J. P. B. DE
Locher, G. W.
1988. J. P. B. de Josselin de Jong en her Leidse Structuralisme. Anthropologische
Verkenningen 7 (1-2): 51-74.
OBITUARIES
Baal, J. van.
1965. J. P. B. de. Josselin de Jong (1886-1964). Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land en
Volkenkunde 121: 293-302.
Editors.
1965. J. P. B. de. Josselin de Jong (1886-1964). Lingua 13: 223-229.
HAVE
Kuiper, F. B. J.
1965-1966. J. P. B. de. Josselin de Jong (1886-1964). Jaarboek 1965-1966, Koninklijke
Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen: 397-403.
Locher, G. W.

1965. J. P. B. de. Josselin de Jong (1886-1964). Mens en Maatschappij 40: 36-47.
KELLY, RAYMOND C.
Peletz, Michael G., and Bruce M. Knauft.
2006. Structure, Cultural Logic, and Transformational Dynamics in the Social
Organization of Unstratified Societies: The Work of Raymond C. Kelly. Michigan
Discussions in Anthropology 16: 66-105. (Special Issue: “Retrospectives: Works and
Lives of Michigan Anthropologists.”)
KOHLER, JOSEF.
Adam, Leonhard.
HAVE
1919. Josef Kohler und die vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft. In Festgabe für Josef
Kohler zum Siebzigsten Geburtstage. Ss. 1-31. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
OBITUARY
Adam, Leonhard.
HAVE
1920. In memoriam Josef Kohler. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 38: 1-
30.
KOVALEVSKY, MAXIM M.
Badredinov, Evgeny.
HAVE
2005. Problems of Modernization in Late Imperial Russia: Maxim M. Kovalevsky on
Social and Economic Reform. Ph.D. dissertation. Louisiana State University. [Pp. 8-35:
Kovalevksy on family communes.]
KROEBER, ALFRED L.
Alès, Catherine.
HAVE
2009. Discussion of “A. L. Kroeber and the New Kinship Studies.” Anthropological
Forum 19 (1): 21-22.
See also Shapiro 2009a; 2009b; Watts 2009.
Hymes, Dell.
1961. Alfred Louis Kroeber. Language 37 (1): 1-28.
Kroeber, Alfred L.
1952. II. Kinship and Social Organization. Introduction. In The Nature of Culture, by A.
L. Kroeber. Pp. 169-174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Introduction to 9
articles on kinship reprinted in this volume describing the background of Kroeber’s
thought.]
Lowie, Robert H.
1936. Alfred L. Kroeber: Professional Appreciation. In Essays in Anthropology
Presented to A. L. Kroeber in Celebration of His Sixtieth Birthday, June 11, 1936. Pp.
XIX-XXIII. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. [Briefly on Kroeber’s
involvement in kinship studies.]
Shapiro, Warren.
HAVE
2008. Innatism in the Anthropology of A. L. Kroeber: A Critique of “the Boasian

Paradigm.” Anthropological Forum 18: 1-15. [Includes discussion of Kroeber’s ideas
about the logic of kin classifications.]
Shapiro, Warren.
HAVE
2009a. A. L. Kroeber and the New Kinship Studies. Anthropological Forum 19 (1): 1-20.
See also Alès 2009; Watts 2009; Shapiro 2009b.
Shapiro, Warren.
HAVE
2009b. The Universal Genealogical Grid as an Ethnographic Finding: A Response to
Alès and Watts. Anthropological Forum 19 (1): 22-27.
See also Alès 2009; Shapiro 2009a; Watts 2009.
Steward, Julian H.
1961. Alfred Louis Kroeber 1876-1960. International Journal of Comparative Sociology
2: 88-106. [Pp. 102-103: on Kroeber’s work on kinship.]
Steward, Julian H.
1973. Alfred Kroeber. New York and London: Columbia University Press. [Pp. 35-36:
Kroeber’s work on kinship terminologies.]
Watts, Linda K.
HAVE
2009. Discussion of “A. L. Kroeber and the New Kinship Studies.” Anthropological
Forum 19 (1): 22-27.
See also Alès 2009; Shapiro 2009a; 2009b.
OBITUARIES
Steward, Julian H.
1961. Alfred Louis Kroeber 1876-1960. American Anthropologist 63 (5, pt. 1): 1038-
1060.
Steward, Julian H.
1962. Alfred Louis Kroeber. In Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of
Sciences Vol. 36: 192-253.
LAFITEAU, JOSEPH-FRANÇOIS
Certeau, Michel de.
HAVE
1980. Writing vs. Time: History and Anthropology in the Works of Lafitau. Yale French
Studies 59: 37-64. [Pp. 55: the meaning of interest in Iroquois kinship in Lafiteau.]
LANDES, RUTH
Cole, Sally Cooper.
2003. Ruth Landes: A Life in Anthropology. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska
Press. [Pp. 72-73: on the cross-cousin marriage among the Ojibwa (Landes’s letter of
1932) and on Landes’s Ojibwa Sociology; cross-listed in ALGIC.]
Bonte, Pierre, and Michel Izard.
LEACH, EDMUND R.

1991. Leach, Edmund Ronald. In Dictionnaire de l’Ethnologie er de l’Anthropologie. Pp.
411-412. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Fuller, Chris, and Jonathan Parry.
HAVE
1989. ‘Petulant Inconsistency’: The Intellectual Achievement of Edmund Leach.
Anthropology Today 5 (3): 11-14.
Jáuregui, Jesús.
1996. Edmund Leach: Un antropólogo en el stricto sentido de la palabra. In Cultura y
Communicación: Edmund Leach in Memoriam, edited by Jesús Jáuregui, María E.
Olavarría y Victor M. Franco Pellotier. Pp. 23-30. México: Centro de Investigaciones y
Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-
Unidad Iztapalapa. [Especially pp. 25-26: on Leach’s work on Jinghpaw and Pul Eliya
kinship.]
Tambiah, Stanley J.
2002. Edmund Leach: An Anthropological Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LÉVI-STRAUSS, CLAUDE
Asch, Michael.
HAVE
2005. Lévi-Strauss and the Political: The Elementary Structures of Kinship and the
Resolution of Relations between Indigenous People and Settler States. Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute 11 (3): 425-444. [Cross-listed in ETHNICITY-RACE-
POLITICS and AMERICA-INDIGENOUS.]
Augé, Marc.
1978. Vers un refus de l’alternative sens-fonction. L’Homme 18 (3-4): 139-154. [On the
Elementary Structures of Kinship.]
Barbosa de Almeida, Mauro W.
HAVE
1990. Symmetry and Entropy: Mathematical Metaphors in the Work of Lévi-Strauss.
Current Anthropology 31 (4): 367-385
Boon, James A., and David M. Schneider.
1974. Kinship vis-à-vis Myth: Contrasts in Levi-Strauss’ Approaches to Cross-Cultural
Comparison. American Anthropologist 76 (4): 799-817.
Carroll, Michael P.
HAVE
1978. Lévi-Strauss on the Oedipus Myth: A Reconsideration. American Anthropologist
80 (4): 805-814. [On both the devaluation and affirmation of patrilineal ties in the Theban
Saga as a reflection of transition from patrilineal clans to polis-type of social organization
in ancient Greece; cross-listed in INDO-EUROPEAN.]
Collard, Chantal.
2000. Femmes échangées, femmes échangistes. À propos de la théorie de l’alliance de
Claude Lévi-Strauss. L’Homme 154-155: 101-116. (Special issue: Question de Parenté.)
See below Héritier, 2000, for commentary.
De Josselin de Jong, J. P. B.
1952. Lévi-Strauss’s Theory on Kinship and Marriage. Leiden: Brill.

Review: Homans 1955.
Reprinted in: Structural Anthropology in the Netherlands: A Reader, edited by P. E. de
Josselin de Jong. Pp. 253-319. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Dorais, Louis-Jacques.
1979. Language and Society. In Challenging Anthropology: A Critical Introduction to
Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by David H. Turner and Gavin A. Smith. Pp.
158-174. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. [Pp. 159-160: Lévi-Strauss’s approach to
kinship systems.]
Eggan, Fred.
1968. One Hundred Years of Ethnology and Social Anthropology. In One Hundred Years
of Anthropology, edited by J. O. Brew. Pp. 119-149. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press. [Pp. 143-144: Lévi-Strauss and kinship studies.]
Erhart, Walter
2000. Claude Lévi-Strauss: Die Elementaren Strukturen der Verwandtschaft (1949). In
Jahrhundertbücher: Große Theorien von Freud bis Luhmann, edited by Walter Erhart
and Herbert Jaumann. Pp. 245-261. Munich: Beck.
Gillespie, Susan D.
2000. Lévi-Strauss: Maison and Société à Maison. In Beyond Kinship: Social and
Material Reproduction in House Societies, edited by Rosemary A. Joyce and Susan D.
Gillespie. Pp. 22-52. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hénaff, Marcel.
1991. Claude Lévi-Strauss. Paris: Pierre Belfond. [Pp. 44-101: “The Movement of
Reciprocity,” and “The Structures of Kinship.”]
Hénaff, Marcel.
1998. Claude Lévi-Strauss and the Making of Structural Anthropology. Translated by
Mary Baker. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Translation of Hénaff 1991.]
Héran, F.
1998. De Granet à Lévi-Strauss. Social Anthropology 6: 1-60. 169-202, 309-330.
Héritier, Françoise.
2000. À propos de la théorie de l’échange. Commentaire de “Femmes échangées, femmes
échangistes.” L’Homme 154-155: 117-122. (Special issue: “Question de Parenté.”)
Heusch, Luc de.
1958. Les voies de l’anthropologie structurale: L’oeuvre de Lévi-Strauss et l’evolution de
l’ethnologie française. Zaïre 8: 787-818.
Jakobson, Roman.
1970. Linguistics. In Main Trends of Research in the Social and Human Sciences. Pt. 1.
Social Sciences. Pp. 419-463. Paris and The Hague: Mouton/Unesco. [Pp. 425-426: on
Levi-Strauss’s work on kinship in the context of communication theory.]
“Linguistics in Relation to Other Sciences” reprinted in: Selected Writings of Roman
Jakobson. Vol. 2. Word and Language. Pp. 655-696. The Hague and Paris: Mouton,
1971. [P. 663: on Lévi-Strauss’s research on kinship.]

Jáuregui, Jesús.
1990. Las estructuras elementales del parentesco de Claude Lévi Strauss por Simone de
Beauvoir. Debate Feminista 1 (1): 288-302.
Jenkins, Alan.
1979. The Social Theory of Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
[Especially Pt. II on kinship.]
Johnson, Christopher.
2003. Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Formative Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. [Pp. 68-103: “From kinship to myth.”]
Köbben, A. J. F., J. Verrips, and L. N. J. Brunt.
HAVE
1974. Lévi-Strauss and Empirical Inquiry. Ethnology 13 (3): 215-224. [On Levi-Strauss
ideas about “Crow-Omaha” systems.]
Korn, Francis.
1969a. The Logic of Some Concepts in Levi-Strauss. American Anthropologist 71 (1):
70-71. [On “prescription” and “preference.”]
Korn, Francis.
1969b. The Use of the Term ‘Model’ in Some of Lévi-Strauss’s Works. Bijdragen tot de
Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 125: 1-11.
Korn, Francis.
1973. Elementary Structures Reconsidered: Lévi-Strauss on Kinship. Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press. 168 P.
Reviews: Rivière 1973; Berndt 1973-1974; Vatuk 1974; Shapiro 1975.
Korn, Francis.
1996. Lévi-Strauss y las Estructuras Elementales. Traducido del ingles por Rosa M.
Torlaschi. Buenos Aires: Centro Argentino de Etnologia Americana. 177 P. [Translation
of Korn 1973.]
Korn, Francis, and Rodney Needham.
1969. Lévi-Strauss on the Elementary Structures of Kinship: A Concordance to
Pagination. Man 4 (2): 1-6..
HAVE
Leach, Edmund R.
1965. Claude Lévi-Strauss - Anthropologist and Philosopher. New Left Review 34: 12-27.
Reprinted in: Theory in Anthropology: A Source-Book, edited by Robert A. Manners and
David Kaplan. Pp. 541-550. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Leach, Edmund R.
1970. Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking Press.
Leach, Edmund R.
1977. The Atom of Kinship, Filiation and Descent: Error in Translation or Confusion of
Ideas L’Homme 17 (2-3): 127-129.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude.
1997. Réponse à Edmund Leach. L’Homme 17 (2-3): 131-133.

Racine, Luc.
1990. Structure, modèle et analogie: Révisions critique de quelques concepts du
structuralisme lévi-straussien. L’Ethnographie 107: 6-38. (Special Issue: “Structuralisme
et Parenté: Autres Approaches.”)
Rossi, Ino.
1982. Lévi-Strauss’ Theory of Kinship and Its Empiricist Critics: An Anti-Needham
Position. In The Logic of Culture: Advances in Structural Theory and Methods, edited by
Ino Rossi. Pp. 42-67. South Hadley, MA: Bergin.
Scheffler, Harold W.
1966. Structuralism in Anthropology. Yale French Studies 36/37: 66-88.
HAVE
Scheffler, Harold W.
1970. Structuralism in Anthropology. In Structuralism, edited by Jacques Ehrmann. Pp.
56-79. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Scubla, Lucien.
1998. Lire Lévi-Strauss: Le Déploiement d’une Intuition. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.
[Pp. 147-151: on the atom of kinship, and passim.]
Shapiro, Warren.
1992. Speculations upon the Origin of “Elementary Structures”. Cultural Anthropology 7
(2): 255-258.
Simonis, Yvan.
1968. Claude Lévi-Strauss ou la ‘Passion de l’Inceste’: Introduction au Structuralisme.
Paris: Aubier-Montaigne. 380 P.
Sperber, Dan.
1968. Le structuralisme en anthropologie. In Qu’est-ce Que le Structuralisme Pp. 167-
238. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. [Pp. 170-192: “Marriage Alliances.”]
Turner, David H.
1975-1976. The Myth of Lévi-Strauss: An Introduction to Structural Analysis.
Anthropological Forum 4 (1): 3-18.
Urrutia, Benjamin.
HAVE
1974. Lévi-Strauss and Mormonism. American Anthropologist 76 (2): 342-343.
[Correction to a description of Mormon marriage practices found in The Elementary
Structures of Kinship.]
Wijetunge, Rajah.
HAVE
1972. Prince Siddhartha’s Cross-Cousin. Man 7 (1): 138. [A factual inaccuracy in The
Elementary Structures of Kinship.]
OBITUARIES
LOUNSBURY, FLOYD
Chafe, Wallace.
1999. Floyd Glenn Lounsbury, 1914-1998 – A Brief Obituary. Historiographia
Linguistica 26 (3): 333-341.

Conklin, Harold C.
2000. Obituary: Floyd Glenn Lounsbury (1914-1998). American Anthropologist 102 (4):
860-864.
Houston, S. D.
2000. Obituary of Floyd Lounsbury. Written Language and Literacy 3 (1): 189-195.
LOWIE, ROBERT H.
Lowie, Robert H.
1959. Robert H. Lowie, Ethnologist: A Personal Record. Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press. [Especially pp. 127-146: “Success and Failure in Writing”
on Lowie’s monographs, including the ones on kinship and social organization.]
Murphy, Robert F.
1972. Robert H. Lowie. New York and London: Columbia University Press. [Pp. 51ff :
Lowie’s work on kinship systems.]
MCLENNAN, JOHN F.
Jones, Robert A.
2005. The Secret of the Totem: Religion and Society from McLennan to Freud. New
York: Columbia University Press. [Pp. 11-58: McLennan’s theories of kinship and
totemism.]
Rivière, Peter.
1970. Editor’s Introduction. In Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origin of the
Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies, by John F. McLennan. Pp. VII-LI. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
MAINE, HENRY S.
Kuper, Adam.
1985. Ancestors: Henry Maine and the Constitution of Primitive Society. History and
Anthropology 1: 265-286.
Kuper, Adam.
1991. The Rise and Fall of Maine’s Patriarchal Theory. In The Victorian Achievement of
Sir Henry Maine, edited by Alan Diamond. Pp. 99-110. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Macfarlane, Alan D. J.
1991. Some Contributions of Sir Henry Maine to History and Anthropology. In The
Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine, edited by Alan Diamond. Pp. 111-142.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peel, J. D. Y.
1991. Maine as an Ancestor of the Social Sciences. In The Victorian Achievement of Sir
Henry Maine, edited by Alan Diamond. Pp. 179-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Pollock, Frederick.
1893. Sir Henry Maine as a Jurist. Edinburgh Review 178: 100-121.

Shils, Edward.
1991. Henry Sumner Maine in the Tradition of the Analysis of Society. In The Victorian
Achievement of Sir Henry Maine, edited by Alan Diamond. Pp. 143-178. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Starr, June.
1989. The “Invention” of Early Legal Ideas: Sir Henry Maine and the Perpetual Tutelage
of Women. In History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal
Anthropology, edited by June Starr and Jane F. Collier. Pp. 345-368. Ithaca and London:
Cornell University Press. [Pp. 357-360: “Roman marriage forms” and on Ancient Law
passim.]
Tupper, Charles L.
1898. India and Sir Henry Maine. Journal of the Society of Arts 46: 390-399.
MAITLAND, FREDERIC W.
Vinogradoff, Paul.
1907. Frederic William Maitland. English Historical Review 22: 280-289.
White, Stephen D.
1996. Maitland on Family and Kinship. In The History of English Law: Centenary Essays
on ‘Pollock and Maitland’, edited by John Hudson. Pp. 91-113. Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press. [Cross-listed in INDO-EUROPEAN.]
Reprinted in: Re-Thinking Kinship and Feudalism in Early Medieval Europe, by Stephen
D.White. Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2005.
MALINOWSKI, BRONISLAW
Firth, Raymond.
HAVE
1981. Bronislaw Malinowski. In Totems and Teachers: Perspectives of the History of
Anthropology, edited by Sydel Silverman. Pp. 101-137. New York: Columbia University
Press.
Fortes, Meyer.
1957. Malinowski and the Study of Kinship. In Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the
Work of Bronislaw Malinowski, edited by Raymond Firth. Pp. 157-188. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Leach, Edmund.
1957. The Epistemological Background to Malinowski’s Empiricism. In Man and
Culture: An Evaluation of the Work of Bronislaw Malinowski, edited by Raymond Firth.
Pp. 119-138. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [P. 130-131: Malinowski on kinship
classifications.]
Montagu, Ashley.
HAVE
1966. Comments on Opler’s Reference to Malinowski. American Anthropologist 68 (2,
pt. 1): 525-526.
See Opler 1965 in REVIEWS and Opler 1966.
Opler, Marvin K.
HAVE

1966. Dating a Theory of Kinship: Reply to Ashley Montagu. American Anthropologist
68 (2, pt. 1): 526-527.
See Montagu 1966.
Parkin, Robert J.
1997. Bronislaw Malinowski. In The Dictionary of Anthropology, edited by Thomas
Barfield. Pp. 300-302. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pulman, Bertrand.
2002. Malinowski et l’ignorance de la paternité. Revue Française de Sociologie 43-44:
739-763.
Thornton, Robert, and Peter Skalnik.
1993. Introduction: Malinowski’s Reading, Writing, 1904-1914. In The Early Writings of
Bronisław Malinowski, edited by Robert Thornton and Peter Skalník. Translated by
Ludwik Krzyźanowski. Pp. 1-64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Pp. 58-64:
“The Essay on ‘The relation of primitive beliefs to the forms of social organization’” and
“The Essay on ‘The Sociology of the family’, a review of literature.”]
Young, M. W.
2004. Malinowski, Bronislaw (1884–1942). In International Encyclopedia of the Social
and Behavioral Sciences: 9147-9151.
MATHEWS, R. H.
Elkin, Adolphus P.
1976. R. H. Mathews: His Contribution to Aboriginal Studies. Oceania 46: 207-234.
OBITUARY
MAYBURY-LEWIS, DAVID
Yalman, Nur.
HAVE
2009. David Maybury-Lewis (1929–2007). American Anthropologist 111 (2): 259 – 261.
OBITUARY
MEGGITT, MERVYN
Beckett, Jeremy.
2004. Obituary: Mervyn Meggitt, 1924-2004. Australian Journal of Anthropology 16 (1):
116-119. (Special Issue: “Paradigms Lost The Study of Kinship in the 21 Century.”) st
MORGAN, LEWIS H.
Barnard, Alan.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 31-32.
Bieder, Robert E.
HAVE
1980. The Grand Order of the Iroquois: Influences on Lewis Henry Morgan’s Ethnology.
Ethnohistory 27 (4): 349-361. [Includes the seminal role of Isaac Hurd on the

development of Morgan’s interest in ethnology, in general, and Iroquois kinship, in
particular.]
Bodemann, Y. Michal.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 32.
Eggan, Fred.
HAVE
1960. Lewis H. Morgan in Kinship Perspective. In Essays in the Science of Culture in
Honor of Leslie A. White, edited by Gertrude E. Dole and Robert L. Carneiro. Pp. 179-
201. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Reprinted in: Essays in Social Anthropology and Ethnology, by Fred Eggan. Pp. 231-252.
Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology, 1975.
Eggan, Fred.
1965. Some Reflections on Comparative Method in Anthropology. In Context and
Meaning in Cultural Anthropology. In Honor of A. Irving Hallowell, edited by Melford
E. Spiro. Pp. 357-372. New York: Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan. [Pp. 360-362:
on Morgan’s theory of kinship and social evolution.]
Eggan, Fred.
1966. Lewis H. Morgan and the Study of Social Organization. In The American Indian:
Perspectives for the Study of Social Change. The Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures 1964,
University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. Pp. 1-14. Chicago: Aldine. [Drawn on
Eggan’s 1960 Lewis H. Morgan in Kinship Perspective.]
Eggan, Fred.
1972. Lewis Henry Morgan’s Systems: A Reevaluation. In Kinship Studies in the Morgan
Centennial Year, edited by Priscilla Reining. Pp. 1-16. Washington: Anthropological
Society of Washington.
Reprinted in: Essays in Social Anthropology and Ethnology, by Fred Eggan. Pp. 315-334.
Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology, 1975.
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian.
HAVE
2001a. The Ethnography of Creation: Lewis Henry Morgan and the American Beaver. In
Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship, edited by Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon.
Pp. 54-84. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian.
2001b. ‘The Mystery of Life in All Its Forms’: Religious Dimensions of Culture in Early
American Anthropology. In Religion and Cultural Studies, edited by Susan Mizruchi. Pp.
140-191. Princeton University Press. [Morgan’s understanding of kinship.]
Fleuret, Patrick.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 32.
Fried, Morton.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 32-33.
Godelier, Maurice.

1972. Lewis Henry Morgan (1818-1881). In Encyclopaedia Universalis. Vol. 12. Pp.
627-629. Paris: Encyclopaedia Universalis France.
Reprinted in: Horizon: Trajets Marxistes en Anthropologie, by Maurice Godelier. T. 1.
Pp. 55-65. Paris: F. Maspero, 1973.
Grijp, Paul van der.
HAVE
1997. Pioneer of Untaught Anthropology: Recontextualizing Lewis H. Morgan and His
Kinship Perspective. Dialectical Anthropology 22 (2): 103-136.
Hallowell, A. Irving.
1960. The Beginnings of Anthropology in America. American Anthropologist
Reprinted in: Selected Papers from the American Anthropologist, 1880-1920, edited by
Frederica de Laguna. pp. 1-90. Evanston: Row and Peterson, 1960; Contributions to
Anthropology: Selected Papers of A. Irving Hallowell. Pp. 36-125. Chicago and London:
University of Chicago Press. [Pp. 85-89: on Morgan’s Systems.]
Harding, Thomas G.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 33.
Henry, Joseph.
1872. Notice of a Work by L. H. Morgan, on the System of Relationship Adopted by
Different Races and Tribes of Men. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for
1868: 19-20.
Köcke, Jasper.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 33-34.
Krader, Lawrence.
1972. Introduction. In The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx (Studies of Morgan,
Phear, Maine, Lubbock). Transcribed and edited by Lawrence Krader. Pp. 1-85. Assen:
Van Gorcum. [Pp. 6-31, 76-85: on Marx, Engels and Morgan.]
Krader, Lawrence.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 34-35.
Kuper, Adam.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 35.
Kuper, Adam.
HAVE
1985. The Development of Lewis Henry Morgan’s Evolutionism. Journal of the History
of Behavioral Sciences 21: 3-22.
Kuper, Adam.
1993. Reply to Tooker. American Anthropologist 95 (2): 443-446.
See Tooker 1992, 1993.
Legros, Dominique.

1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 35-36.
Lowie, Robert H.
1936. Lewis Henry Morgan in Historical Perspective. In Essays in Anthropology
Presented to A. L. Kroeber in Celebration of his Sixtieth Birthday, June 11, 1936, edited
by Robert H. Lowie. Pp. 169-181. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Reprinted in: Readings in Anthropology, edited by E. Adamson Hoebel, Jesse D.
Jennings and Elmer R. Smith. Pp. 364-377. New York, etc.: McGraw-Hill, 1955.
Lowie, Robert H.
1946. Evolution in Cultural Anthropology: A Reply to Leslie White. American
Anthropologist 48 (2): 223-233.
Reprinted in: Lowie’s Selected Papers in Anthropology, edited by Cora Du Bois. Pp. 411-
424. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1960. [Includes an
assessment and appreciation of Morgan’s research on kinship.]
Makarius, Raoul.
1977. Ancient Society and Morgan’s Kinship Theory 100 Years After. Current
Anthropology 18 (4): 709-729.
HAVE
Makarius, Raoul.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 36.
Marx, Karl.
1972. The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx (Studies of Morgan, Phear, Maine,
Lubbock). Transcribed and edited by Lawrence Krader. Assen: Van Gorcum. [Pp. 95-
242: “Marx’s Excerpts from Lewis Henry Morgan Ancient Society.”]
Moore, John H.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 36-57.
Morgan, Nathaniel H.
1869. Morgan Genealogy: A History of James Morgan, of New London, Conn. And His
Descendants; from 1607 to 1869. Hartford: Case, Lockwood & Brainard. [Pp. 5-15:
general thoughts on kinship and genealogy; 177-179: on Lewis H. Morgan’s kinship
research.]
HAVE
Norbeck, E.
1963. Lewis Henry Morgan and Japanese Terms of Relationship: Profit through Error.
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19: 208-215. [Cross-listed in JAPANESE.]
Ottenheimer, Martin.
HAVE
1990. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Prohibition of Cousin Marriage in the United States.
Journal of Family History 15 (3): 325-334.
Pilling, Arnold R.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 37-38.

Powell, John W.
1881. Sketch of Lewis H. Morgan. Popular Science Monthly 18: 114-121.
HAVE
Ramírez, Ignacio, and Francisco Pimentel.
1873. Cuestión antropológica. Boletin de la Sociedad de Geografía y Estadística de la
República Mexicana 1: 204-208. México.
Reprinted under title “Discusión sobre la aplicación de la teoría de Morgan para el
estudio de los nombres de parentesco en las lenguas indígenas, (1873).” in: Nueva
Antropologia 5 (18): 61-65. (Special issue: Los Estudios de Parentesco en Mexico.)
Raulin, Anne.
2010. Sur la vie et le temps de Lewis Henry Morgan. L’Homme 195-196: 225-246.
Resek, Carl.
1960. Lewis Henry Morgan: American Scholar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Semenov, Iu. I.
1965. The Doctrine of Morgan, Marxism and Contemporary Ethnography. Soviet
Anthropology and Archaeology 4 (2): 3-15. [Translation of an article from Sovetskaia
Etnografiia 4, 1964. P. 5: Morgan’s kinship research.]
Service, Elman R.
1981. The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan. Current Anthropology 22 (1): 25-43.
Comments: Barnard 1981; Bodemann; Fried 1981; Harding 1981; Köcke 1981; Krader
1981; Kuper 1981; Legros 1981; Makarius 1981; Moore, J. 1981; Pilling 1981; Skalník
1981; Strathern, A. 1981; Tooker 1981; Whitecotton 1981.
Service, Elman R.
1981. Reply. Current Anthropology 22 (1): 40-41.
Skalník, Peter.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 38-39.
Spoehr, Alexander.
HAVE
1981. Lewis Henry Morgan and His Pacific Collaborators: A Nineteenth-Century
Chapter in the History of Anthropological Research. Proceedings of the American
Philosophical Society 125 (6): 449-459.
Stern, Bernard J.
1931. Lewis Henry Morgan: Social Evolutionist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Review: Fürer-Haimendorf 1931.
Strathern, Andrew.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 39.
Terray, Emmanuel.
1969. Morgan et l’anthropologie contemporaine. In Le Marxisme devant les Sociétés
“Primitives”: Deux Études par Emmanuel Terray. Pp. 11-91. Paris: François Maspero.

English translation: “Morgan and Contemporary Anthropology” in Marxism and
“Primitive” Societies: Two Studies by Emmanuel Terray. Translated by Mary Klopper.
Pp. 5-92. New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1972.
Tooker, Elizabeth.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 39-40.
Tooker, Elizabeth.
HAVE
1992. Lewis H. Morgan and His Contemporaries. American Anthropologist 94 (2): 357-
375. [Includes description of Morgan’s kinship studies.]
Tooker, Elizabeth.
1993. Reply to Kuper’s Commentary. American Anthropologist 95 (2): 446-448.
HAVE
Trautmann, Thomas R.
HAVE
1984. Decoding Dravidian Kinship: Morgan and McIlvaine. Man 19: 421-431. [Crosslisted
in DRAVIDIAN.]
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1987. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Reviews: Service 1988; Davenport 1989; Pfeffer 1989; Francello 1990; Scheffler 1990;
Watts 1990; Hinsley 1991.
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1988. Dravidian Kinship and the Anthropology of Lewis Henry Morgan. Journal of the
American Oriental Society 108: 93-97.
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1991. Morgan, Lewis Henry. In International Dictionary of Anthropologists, edited by
Christopher Winters. Pp. 481-484. New York and London: Garland Publishing.
Trautmann, Thomas R.
HAVE
1992. Whig Ethnology from Locke to Morgan. Journal of the Anthropological Society of
Oxford 23 (1): 201-218.
Trautmann, Thomas R., and Karl S. Kabelac.
1994. The Library of Lewis Henry Morgan. Philadelphia: American Philosophical
Society. 336 P.
White, Leslie A.
1946. Lewis Henry Morgan. Union Worthies 1: 5-9. Union College, Schenectady, N. Y.
[Pp. 6-7: on Morgan’s Systems.]
White, Leslie A.
1948. Lewis H. Morgan: Pioneer in the Theory of Social Evolution. In An Introduction to
the History of Sociology, edited by Harry E. Barnes. Pp. 138-154. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
White, Leslie A.
1951. Lewis H. Morgan’s Western Field Trips. American Anthropologist 53 (1): 11-18.

White, Leslie A.
1957. How Morgan Came to Write Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity. Papers of the
Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 42 (2): 252-268.
White, Leslie A.
1959. The Concept of Evolution in Cultural Anthropology. In Evolution and
Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal. Pp. 106-125. Washington, D. C.: Anthropological
Society of Washington. [Pp. 107, 123: on Morgan’s Systems.]
Whitecotton, Joseph W.
1981. Comment on The Mind of Lewis H. Morgan, by Elman R. Service. Current
Anthropology 22 (1): 40.
Znamenski, Andrei A.
HAVE
1995. A Household God in the Socialist World: Lewis Henry Morgan and Russian/Soviet
Anthropology. Ethnologia Europaea: Journal of European Ethnology 2: 177-188.
Copenhagen.
MURDOCK, GEORGE P.
De Lint, Jan, and Ronald Cohen.
1960. One Factor Magic: A Discussion of Murdock's Theory of Social Evolution.
Anthropologica 2 (1): 95-104. [Specifically on kinship systems and the factor of
residence.]
OBITUARIES
Spoehr, Alexander.
1985. George Peter Murdock (1897-1985). Ethnology 24 (4): 307-317.
Whiting, John W. M.
1986. George Peter Murdock (1897-1985). American Anthropologist 88 (3): 682-686.
OBITUARIES
NADEL, SIEGFRIED F. S.
Forde, Daryll.
1956b. Siegfried Frederick Stephen Nadel. Obituary. Africa 26: 105-106.
Fortes, Meyer
1957. Siegfried Frederick Nadel, 1903-1956: A Memoir. In The Theory of Social
Structure, by Siegfried F. S. Nadel. Pp. IV-XVI. London: Cohen and West.
OBITUARY
NAROLL, RAOUL
Otterbein, Keith F.
1987. Raoul Naroll (1920-1985). American Anthropologist 88: 136-142.
NEEDHAM, RODNEY

OBITUARY
Fox, James J.
HAVE
2008. Rodney Needham (1923–2006). American Anthropologist 110 (3): 401-403.
OBITUARY
OBERG, KALERVO
McComb, Marlin R. and George M. Foster.
HAVE
1975. Recent Deaths and Memorials: Kalervo Oberg (1901-1973). American Indian
Quarterly 2 (1): 93-97.
OLDEROGGE, DMITRII A.
Bondarenko, Dmitri M., and Vladimir A. Popov.
2005. Dmitri Olderogge and His Place in the History of Russian African Anthropology.
Social Anthropology 13 (2): 215-220.
Gellner, Ernest.
1991. Ol’derogge, Dmitri Alexeevich. In International Dictionary of Anthropologists. Pp.
519-520. New York and London: Garland.
OBITUARY
Brauner, S.
1987. Im Memoriam Dmitrij Alexeevic Olderogge. Zeitschrift für Phonetik,
Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 40 (4): 590-591.
OTTENHEIMER, MARTIN
Broz, Ludek.
2001. Interview with Professor Martin Ottenheimer. Cargo: Casopis pro kulturní/sociální
antropologii 3-4: 110-126.
RADCLIFFE-BROWN, ALFRED R.
Beattie, John H. M.
1975. Radcliffe-Brown’s Contribution to Kinship Studies. Man 10 (1): 131-132.
[Response to Needham’s Introduction to Rethinking Kinship and Marriage.]
See Needham 1975.
Beattie, John H. M.
1999. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown (1881-1995). Journal for the Anthropological Study of
Human Movement 10 (4): 193-200.
Fortes, Meyer.
1955. Radcliffe-Brown’s Contributions to the Study of Social Organization. British
Journal of Sociology 6 (1):
Reprinted in: Time and Social Structure and Other Essays, by Meyer Fortes. Pp. 260-
278. London: Athlone Press; New York: Humanities Press, 1970

Needham, Rodney.
1975a. Radcliffe-Brown’s Contribution to Kinship Studies. Man 10 (1): 132. [Reply to
Beattie 1975.]
Needham, Rodney.
1975b. Radcliffe-Brown and Daisy Bates. Man 10 (2): 310-311. [Reply to Scheffler
1975.]
Sarana, Gopala.
1956. Radcliffe-Brown’s Contributions to Kinship Studies. Eastern Anthropologist 10
(1): 13-29.
Scheffler, Harold W.
1975. Radcliffe-Brown and Daisy Bates. Man 10 (2): 310-311.
See also Needham 1975a, b.
Srinivas, M. N.
1958. Introduction. In Method in Social Anthropology: Selected Essays by A. R.
Radcliffe-Brown, edited by M. N. Srinivas. Pp. IX-XXI. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1958. [P. XIII: Radcliffe-Brown’s work on Australian kinship.]
Stocking, George W.
1984a. Dr. Durkheim and Mr. Brown. In Functionalism Historicized: Essays on British
Anthropology, edited by George W. Stocking. Pp. 106-130. Madison: University of
Wisconsin Press. [Includes Radcliffe-Brown’s lecture on comparative sociology, with
discussion of kinship.]
Stocking, George W.
1984b. Radcliffe-Brown and British Social Anthropology. In Functionalism Historicized:
Essays on British Anthropology, edited by George W. Stocking. Pp. 131-191. Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
OBITUARIES
Eggan, Fred, and W. Lloyd Warner.
1956. Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown: 1881-1955. American Anthropologist 58: 544-
547.
Elkin, Adolphus P.
1956. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, 1881-1955. Oceania 26: 239-251.
Firth, Raymond.
1956. Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown, 1881-1955. Proceedings of the British
Academy for 1956: 287-302.
Forde, Daryll.
1956a. Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown. Obituary. Africa 26: 1.
Fortes, Meyer.
1956. Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown, F.B.A., 1881-1955: A Memoir. Man 56: 149-
153.

Stanner, William E. H.
1955. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown. [Obituary]. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 13:
116-125.
RIVERS, WILLIAM H. R.
Bartlett, Frederic C.
1968. W. H. R. Rivers. The Eagle 62: 156-160. Cambridge: St. John’s College.
Firth, Raymond.
1968. Rivers on Oceanic Kinship. In Kinship and Social Organization, by W. H. R.
Rivers. London: Athlone Press. [Cross-listed in AUSTRONESIAN.]
Slobodin, Richard.
1978. W. H. R. Rivers. New York: Columbia University Press. [Especially, pp. 132-147:
“Chapter 4 “Kinship.”]
Review: Scheffler 1980.
Reply: Slobodin 1981.
Pulman, Bertrand.
1986. Aux origines du débat ethnologie/ psychanalyse: W. H. R. Rivers (1824-1922).
L’Homme 26: 119-142.
Whittle, Paul.
2000. W. H. R. Rivers and the Early History of Psychology at Cambridge. In Bartlett,
Culture and Cognition, edited by Akiko Saito. Pp. 21-35. Cambridge: Psychology Press.
OBITUARIES
Bartlett, Frederic C.
1923. Obituary – W. H. R. Rivers. The Eagle 43: 12-14. Cambridge: St. John’s College.
Mauss, Marcel.
1923. W. H. R. Rivers. Revue d’Ethnographie et des Traditions Populaires 4: 1-7. Paris.
Myres, John L.
1923. W. H. R. Rivers. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 53: 14-17.
Seligman, Charles G.
1922. Dr. W. H. R. Rivers. Geographical Journal 60: 162-163.
Seligman, Charles G.
1922b. Dr. W. H. R. Rivers. In Obituaries, Fellows of the Royal Society of London.
Shore, L. E.
1922. Obituary: W. H. R. Rivers. The Eagle 43: 2-12. Cambridge: St. John’s College.
Skinner, Henry D.
1922. Dr. W. H. R. Rivers. Journal of the Polynesian Society 31 (1): 87-88.
Vilhena, Henrique J. de.
1921-1922. William Halse Rivers. Arquivo de Anatomia e Antropologia 7: 403-407.
Lisboa.

RIVIÈRE, PETER.
Rival, Laura.
HAVE
1999. Peter Rivière’s Contribution to Amazonian and Social Anthropology. Journal of
the Anthropological Society of Oxford 30 (3): 213-218.
ROBERTSON SMITH, WILLIAM
Beidelman, T. O.
1974. W. Robertson Smith and the Sociological Study of Religion. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Jones, Robert A.
1984. Robertson Smith and James Frazer on Religion: Two Traditions in British Social
Anthropology. In Functionalism Historicized: Essays on British Social Anthropology,
edited by George W. Stocking. Pp. 31-58. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
[Especially pp. 40-41 on kinship and religion in Robertson Smith.]
Lutzky, Harriet.
1995. Deity and the Social Bond: Robertson Smith and the Psychoanalytic Theory of
Religion. In William Robertson Smith: Essays in Reassessment, edited by William
Johnstone. Pp. 320-330. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. [Cross-listed in
PSYCHOLOGY.]
ROMNEY, A. KIMBALL.
D’Andrade, Roy G.
HAVE
2004. The Search for Simplicity: A. K. Romney and Building Models from Systematic
Data. Cross-Cultural Research 38: 220-235. [Mostly on Romney’s kinship studies.]
SAPIR, EDWARD
Fernández Casas, Maria X.
2004. Edward Sapir en la Lingüística Actual: Líneas de Continuidad en la Historia de la
Lingüística. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. [Pp. 204-
210: the linguistic and the anthropological in kinship terms.]
OBITUARY
Boas, Franz.
HAVE
1939. Edward Sapir. International Journal of American Linguistics 10 (1): 58-63.
SCHMIDT, WILHELM.
Baumann, Hermann.
1958. P. Wilhelm Schmidt und das Mutterrecht. Anthropos 53: 212-228. [Cross-listed in
KIN-BASED GROUPS.]
Brown, Judith K.
1968-1969. W. Schmidt's “Mutterrecht” and Cross-Cultural Research. Anthropos 63-64
(1-2): 3-6. [Cross-listed in KIN-BASED GROUPS.]
SCHNEIDER, DAVID M.

Allard, Olivier.
2006. La parenté en substance: La critique de Schneider et ses effets. L’Homme 177-178:
437-466. [Thoughts on Janet Carsten’s After Kinship and Maurice Godelier’s
Métamorphoses de la Parenté.]
Bashkow, Ira.
1991. The Dynamics of Rapport in a Colonial Situation: David Schneider’s Fieldwork on
the Islands of Yap. History of Anthropology 7: 170-242.
DeMallie, Raymond J.
2001. Procrustes and the Sioux: David M. Schneider and the Study of Sioux Kinship. In
The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications
for Anthropological Relativism, edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp.
46-59. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. [Cross-listed in SIOUAN.]
Feinberg, Richard.
1979. Schneider’s Symbolic Culture Theory: An Appraisal. Current Anthropology 20 (3):
541-549.
Fogelson, Raymond D
2001. Schneider Confronts Componential Analysis. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship:
The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications for Anthropological Relativism,
edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp. 33-45. Urbana, IL: University of
Illinois Press.
Galvin, Kathey-Lee.
2001. Schneider Revisited: Sharing and Ratification in the Construction of Kinship. In
New Directions in Anthropological Kinship, edited by Linda Stone. Pp. 109-124.
Lanham, etc.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Leaf, Murray J.
2001. Schneider’s Idealism, Relativism, and the Confusion of Kinship. In The Cultural
Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications for
Anthropological Relativism, edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp. 60-
77. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
McKinley, Robert.
2001. The Philosophy of Kinship: A Reply to Schneider’s Critique of the Study of
Kinship. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its
Implications for Anthropological Relativism, edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin
Ottenheimer. Pp. 131-167. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Montague, Susan P.
2001. The Trobriand Kinship Classification and Schneider’s Cultural Relativism. In The
Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications for
Anthropological Relativism, edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp.
168-186. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. [Cross-listed in AUSTRONESIAN.]
Ottenheimer, Martin.
2001. Relativism in Kinship Analysis. In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy
of David Schneider and Its Implications for Anthropological Relativism, edited by
Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp. 118-130. Urbana, IL: University of
Illinois Press.

Schneider, David M.
1995. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological
Stories, as told to Richard Handler. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Reviews: Bucher 1997; Yengoyan 1997.
Zimmer-Tamakoshi, Laura.
2001. Development and Ancestral Gerrymandering: Schneider in Papua New Guinea. In
The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications
for Anthropological Relativism, edited by Richard Feinberg and Martin Ottenheimer. Pp.
187-204. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. [Cross-listed in PAPUAN.]
OBITUARY
Handler, R., and S. McKinnon.
1995. David M. Schneider (1918-1995). Anthropological News 36 (9): 39.
OBITUARY
SERVICE, ELMAN R.
Harding Thomas G.
1999. Service, Elman R. (1915-1996). American Anthropologist 101 (1): 161-164.
OBITUARY
SHIMKIN, DEMITRI B.
Myers, L. Daniel.
HAVE
1995. Memorial to Demitri Boris Shimkin (1916-1992). Journal of California and Great
Basin Anthropology 17 (1): 1-4.
SHTERNBERG, LEV
Kan, Sergei.
2001. The “Russian Bastian” and Boas: or Why Shternberg’s “The Social Organization
of the Gilyak” Never Appeared Among the Jesup Expedition Publications. In Gateways:
Exploring the Legacy of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, edited by
William K. Fitzhugh and Igor Krupnik. Pp. 217-248. Washington, D.C.: Arctic Studies
Center, Smithsonian Institution.
Kan, Sergei.
2009. Lev Shternberg: Anthropologist, Russian Socialist, Jewish Activist. Lincoln:
University of Nebraska Press.
OBITUARY
Winnikow, I.
1928. Leo Sternberg. Anthropos 23: 135-140. [P. 137: Shternberg’s work on Gilyak
kinship.]
SPENCER, HERBERT
Beeghley, Leonard.
HAVE

1983. Spencer’s Theory of Kinship Evolution and the Status of Women: Some Neglected
Considerations. Sociological Perspectives 26 (3): 299-322.
THURNWALD, RICHARD
Juillerat, Bernard.
1993. Richard Thurnwald et la Mélanesie: Reciprocites, hierarchies, evolution. Gradhiva
14: 15-40.
TURNER, TERENCE
Sangren, Steve, and Dominic Boyer.
2006. Introduction to Turner Special Issue. Critique of Anthropology 26 (1): 5-13
HAVE
TYLOR, EDWARD B.
OBITUARY
Lowie, Robert H.
1917. Edward B. Tylor. American Anthropologist 19 (2): 262-268. [Includes Tylor’s
theory of the origin of classificatory kin terminologies.]
Reprinted in: Lowie’s Selected Papers in Anthropology, edited by Cora Du Bois. Pp. 365-
371. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1960.
WAKE, CHARLES S.
Needham, Rodney.
1975. Charles Staniland Wake 1835-1910: A Biographical Record. In Studies in Social
Anthropology: Essays in Memory of E. E. Evans-Pritchard by His Former Oxford
Colleagues, edited by John H. M. Beattie and R. G. Lienhardt. Pp. 354-388. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
WEINER, ANNETTE
Beidelman, T. O., and Fred R. Myers.
1998. Annette Weiner (1933-1997). American Anthropologist 100 (3): 757-759.
HAVE
WEITLANER, ROBERT J.
OBITUARY
Foster, George M.
HAVE
1970. Robert J. Weitlaner, 1883-1968. American Anthropologist 72 (2): 343-348.
WESTERMARCK, EDWARD
Allardt, Erik.
2000. Edward Westermarck: A Sociologist Relating Nature and Culture. Acta
Sociologica 43: 299-306.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude.
1945. L’oeuvre d’Edward Westermarck. Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 129 (1-3).

WESTON, KATH
Shapiro, Warren.
HAVE
2010. The Old Kinship Studies Confronts Gay Kinship: A Critique of Kath Weston.
Anthropological Forum 20 (1): 1-18. [Cross-listed in ANTHROPOLOGY and GAY-
LESBIAN.]
OBITUARY
WHITE, LESLIE A.
Service, Elman R., Richard K. Beardsley, and Beth Dillingham.
1976. Leslie Alvin White (1900-1975). American Anthropologist 78 (3): 612-629.
WILKEN, G. A.
Veth, P. J.
1891. De ethnologische Studien van Prof. G. A. Wilken. Internationales Archiv für
Ethnographie 4 : 282-284.
INTERVIEWS
Galey, Jean-Claude.
1981. A conversation with Louis Dumont. Contributions to Indian Sociology 15 (1-2):
13-22. [Especially p. 17 on the influence of Lévi-Strauss’s Elementary Structures of
Kinship on Dumont.]
Kuper, Adam.
1986. An Interview with Edmund Leach. Current Anthropology 24: 375-382.
Panourgia, Neni.
2002. Interview with Clifford Geertz. Anthropological Theory 2: 421-431. [Includes
discussion of the differences between structural-functionalist and interpretative
approaches to kinship.]
OBITUARIES and MEMOIRS
Hilton-Simpson, Melville W., and T. A. Joyce.
1932. Emil Torday: Born 1875: Died 9 May, 1931. Man 32: 48-49.
Jorgensen, Joseph G.
1979. Mischa Titiev, 1901-1978. American Anthropologist 81 (2): 342-344. [Pp.343-344:
on Titiev’s paper “The Importance of Space in primitive Kinship.”]
Kaleikar, N. G.
1973. Irawati Karve. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute 31-32: 1-4.
Kohler, Josef.
1889. Nachruf auf J. J. Bachofen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 8:
148-155.
Kohler, Josef.
1892. Dr. G. A. Wilken. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 10: 450-454.

Kohler, Josef.
1897. Albert Hermann Post. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 12: 455-
457.
Kohler, Josef.
1916. Nachschrift zu Bachofens Selbstbiographie. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende
Rechtswissenschaft 34: 477-480.
Maranda, Pierre.
1993. Roger Martin Keesing (1935-1993). In Memoriam. Anthropologie et Sociétés 17
(3): 189-190.
Morant, G. M.
1936. Obituary. Professor Karl Pearson. Man 36: 89-92.
Murdock, George P.
1942. Bronislaw Malinowski. Yale Law Journal 51: 1235-1236.
Sahlins, Marshall D.
1992. Fred Eggan: History and Structure [12.9.1906-7.5.1991]. Anthropology Today 8
(1): 23-25.
Sathyamurthy, V.
1991. John Hugh Marshall Beattie, 1915-199O: Memorial Address. Journal of the
Anthropological Society of Oxford 22 65-72.
Scherer, J. H., and J. J. de Wolf.
1977. Henri Théodore Fischer, 1901-1976. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en
Volkenkunde 133 (1): 1-10. [Especially pp. 3-4 on Fischer's work on kinship.]
Silverstein, Michael.
2002. Joseph Harold Greenberg (1915-2001). American Anthropologist 104 (2): 630-635.
Tylor, Edward B.
1881. J. F. McLennan. The Academy 20: 9-10.