28.01.2015 Views

(peganum harmala l.), rhizomes of kuth

(peganum harmala l.), rhizomes of kuth

(peganum harmala l.), rhizomes of kuth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pak. Entomol. Vol. 28, No.1, 2006<br />

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTS OF HARMAL (PEGANUM HARMALA L.), RHIZOMES OF<br />

KUTH (SAUSSUREA LAPPA C. B. CLARKE) AND BALCHAR (VALARIANA OFFICIANALIS L.) ON<br />

THE SETTLING AND GROWTH OF PEACH FRUIT FLY, (BACTROCERA ZONATA SAUNDERS)<br />

Masood Khan Khattak 1 , Mohammad Faisal Shahzad 1 and Ghulam Jilani 2<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Gomal University, D.I. Khan.<br />

2. Integrated Pest Management Program, IPEP, NARC, Islamabad.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Repellent and growth inhibiting effect <strong>of</strong> the plants viz. harmal, Kuth and balcher each extracted in petroleum ether,<br />

acetone and ethanol were evaluated at 2%, 1% and 0.5% concentrations against Bactocera zonata Saunder. In a free<br />

choice test in cages, none <strong>of</strong> the plant at 2% affected the settling <strong>of</strong> the test insect, however, emergence <strong>of</strong> progeny adult<br />

was significantly lower in petroleum, ether and acetone extract <strong>of</strong> Saussurea lappa and ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> Peganum<br />

<strong>harmala</strong>. Significantly, lower number <strong>of</strong> fruit flies settled on guava treated with 1% extract <strong>of</strong> all the tested plants as<br />

compared to that in the control. Pupal formation and emergence <strong>of</strong> progeny adult was totally inhibited in 1% petroleum<br />

extract <strong>of</strong> Saussurea lappa at 0.1%, number <strong>of</strong> adult settled were significantly lower in petroleum ether and acetone<br />

extract <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong> and S. lappa, respectively. However, adult emergence was significantly lower than control in all the<br />

extracts.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata Saund. (Diptera,<br />

Tephritidae) is a major insect pest <strong>of</strong> fruit and<br />

vegetables not only in Pakistan but the world over as<br />

well. Fruit fly cause 25-50% loss to guava during<br />

summer (Syed, 1970). The different species <strong>of</strong> fruit<br />

fly cause colossal losses to fruit and vegetables in<br />

tropical, sub tropical and temperate regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world (Batman, 1972). They cause direct loss to fruit<br />

and vegetables and indirect loss by enhancing<br />

expenditure on chemicals which alternately reduce<br />

the market value <strong>of</strong> the product. The infestation may<br />

reach up to 50% in summer crop <strong>of</strong> guava in<br />

Pakistan. The peaches, apricot, guava or other fruit<br />

attacked by this pest are malformed, mis-shaped,<br />

undersized and rotted inside. The damage caused is<br />

very heavy and the fruits become unmarketable<br />

(Atwal, 1976). Due to its life cycle, the actual<br />

damage is virtually safe from the insecticide<br />

applications as the eggs are laid in the fruit tissues<br />

and the larvae feed inside on the pulp. Therefore,<br />

control measures are to be directed at the adult flies.<br />

The adults are long lived and quite mobile but their<br />

longevity associated with frequent feeding enables<br />

them exposed to the poison baits and other control<br />

strategies. The enormous loss due to fruit flies in<br />

food production at all level <strong>of</strong> society demand to<br />

solve this problem with the implementation <strong>of</strong> wide<br />

management strategies in the area.<br />

Mostly, these insect pests are controlled by synthetic<br />

insecticides for their quick knock down effect,<br />

however, careless and indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> these<br />

chemicals leads to a number <strong>of</strong> well known problems<br />

like contamination <strong>of</strong> food, soil, ground water, lakes,<br />

rivers, oceans, air with toxic residues which carry side<br />

effects on non target insects and other organisms,<br />

development <strong>of</strong> resistance in insects against these<br />

pesticides and pest resurgence etc. In addition, many non<br />

lethal and lethal accidents occur due to mishandling <strong>of</strong><br />

highly toxic synthetic products. Because <strong>of</strong> these hazards<br />

<strong>of</strong> the chemicals, there is growing awareness in developed<br />

and even in developing countries <strong>of</strong> toxicological and<br />

environmental problems involved in the use <strong>of</strong> synthetic<br />

pesticides. This awareness has lead to a steadily increasing<br />

movement toward more environmental oriented,<br />

sustainable agriculture with low or no input <strong>of</strong> toxic<br />

synthetic material and other agriculture chemicals in an<br />

attempt to preserve and protect the environment and as<br />

well as human health.<br />

Plant kingdom is by far the most efficient factory <strong>of</strong><br />

compounds. Plants synthesize countless products which<br />

can partially be considered as weapon to defend plants<br />

against pests and diseases. Plants derivatives are less toxic<br />

or non toxic to mammals and other vertebrates and<br />

invertebrates. Plant products have several uses in insect<br />

control. Some act as attractants like geranil and eugenol<br />

while some act as repellent, deterrent and antiovipositional<br />

like neem oil and cotton seed oil etc. The<br />

primary role, however, is insect toxicants (Hashimi, 2001).<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 2600 plant species in the insect pests control<br />

potential, pyrethrum, nicotine, rotenone, ryania, sabadilla<br />

and neem have been registered for significant use as<br />

insecticides (Dhaliwal and Heinrich, 1998).<br />

Different formulations prepared from neem and other<br />

plants like, Pongamina, datura, thevatia etc. have proved<br />

promising in checking insect pest population. The most<br />

important aspect in the use <strong>of</strong> plant products against insect<br />

15


Pak. Entomol. Vol. 28, No.1, 2006<br />

pest is that these naturally occuring materials are non<br />

toxic to man and other animals and are environment<br />

friendly.<br />

METHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

Settling and Growth Regulating Effects <strong>of</strong> Certain<br />

Plants Extracts<br />

To test the repellent/deterrent and growth inhibiting<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> certain plants extracts against peach fruit<br />

fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunder), studies were<br />

carried out at Insect Pest Management Program<br />

(IPMP), Institute <strong>of</strong> Plant and Environmental<br />

Protection, National Agriculture Research Center,<br />

Islamabad.<br />

Seed <strong>of</strong> Harmal (Peganum <strong>harmala</strong> L.), Rhizomes <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>kuth</strong> (Saussurea lappa C.B.Clarke) and Balchar<br />

(Valariana <strong>of</strong>ficianalis L.) used in these studies were<br />

received from the Agervedec shop in Rawalpindi.<br />

Peach fruit fly (Bactrocera zonata) used in these<br />

studies were obtained from the culture maintained in<br />

the laboratory with 27±1C 0 , 60±5% relative humidity<br />

and 14:10 light and dark. Fruit flies were reared on<br />

artificial diet in fruit fly rearing cage (18 x 16 x 16)<br />

having muslin cloth on the two opposite sides. The<br />

other two sides top and bottom were made <strong>of</strong><br />

transparent glass sheet. On alternate day, fresh fruits<br />

were <strong>of</strong>fered to adult flies for oviposition. After<br />

infestation, these fruits were placed in glass jars<br />

having sand at the base for pupation. To allow<br />

aeration the jars were covered with muslin cloth. The<br />

pupae were separated from the sand with 20m sieve.<br />

Pupae were placed in rearing cage with cotton soaked<br />

in water to prevent dessication. After emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

flies, pertinacious diet was provided on daily basis to<br />

the flies. For water requirements water soaked cotton<br />

was placed in Petri-dish inside the rearing cage.<br />

Artificial diet for fruit flies<br />

Ingredient<br />

Bananas<br />

Egg yolk<br />

Honey<br />

Lederplex vitamin B. Complex syrup<br />

Yeast<br />

Sugar<br />

quantity<br />

2 No<br />

6 No<br />

4 table spoon<br />

2 table spoon<br />

1 table spoon<br />

8 table spoon<br />

The ingredients were mixed in a blender to make a<br />

thick syrup solution. For further use the diet is kept in<br />

refrigerator. Products <strong>of</strong> all the tested three plants<br />

were separated, ground to fine powder <strong>of</strong> 60 mesh.<br />

The plant powder were separated, extracted with<br />

petroleum ether, acetone and ethanol in Soxhlet<br />

extraction apparatus, concentrated in rotary<br />

evaporator and finally made solvent free in a vacuum<br />

dessicator. Since plant extracts are insoluble in water<br />

therefore, a small quantity <strong>of</strong> detergent (Surfactant) was<br />

added in distilled water.<br />

To see the effect <strong>of</strong> test plants extracts on the settling <strong>of</strong><br />

fruit flies. All the plant extracts were applied at 2%, 1%<br />

and 0.5% to the fruits separately by dipping method. The<br />

treated and untreated fruits were placed randomly in the<br />

rearing cages. Fifteen day old 40 female fruit flies were<br />

released in the cage. Each cage providing free choice was<br />

replicated three times. The number <strong>of</strong> fruit flies adults<br />

settled on treated and untreated fruits were counted after<br />

every two hours for two days. In this way the repellency/<br />

deterrence was counted. After 48 hours the exposed treated<br />

and untreated fruit to fruit flies were removed and placed<br />

in separate plastic jars with sand in it for fruit flies<br />

pupation. The jars were covered with muslin cloth and<br />

properly labeled. Each treatment was replicated three<br />

times. After 20 days the sand was sieved with 20 mesh<br />

sieve. The pupae were separated and counted and data<br />

recorded for each treatment. The pupae were sticked to<br />

glass vials. The vials were covered with muslin cloth and<br />

labeled. Cotton soaked in water were placed at the top <strong>of</strong><br />

vials to provide moisture needed to prevent pupal<br />

dessication. The emergence <strong>of</strong> fruit fly adults were<br />

recorded for each treatment.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Petroleum ether, acetone and ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

<strong>harmala</strong>, V. <strong>of</strong>ficianalis, and S. lappa when applied at 2%<br />

to guava fruits did not significantly affected the settling or<br />

non preference response <strong>of</strong> the fruit flies (Table-1); as the<br />

mean number <strong>of</strong> flies settled on fruit treated with different<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> plants at 2% concentration were statistically<br />

similar to those settled on the untreated guava fruit.<br />

However, as compared to 0.6867 adults in the control, the<br />

lowest number <strong>of</strong> fruit flies adults settled on guava fruits<br />

treated with 2% acetone extract <strong>of</strong> V. <strong>of</strong>ficianalis. This was<br />

followed by 0.2633 and 0.3733 flies in 2% petroleum ether<br />

extract <strong>of</strong> S. lappa and 0.3967 adult ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> V.<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficianalis.<br />

When the same exposed fruits were placed separately for<br />

pupation the number <strong>of</strong> pupae in some treatments were<br />

significantly lower than those in the control (Table-2).<br />

Minimum number (2.667) pupae were counted each from<br />

the fruits treated with ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong> and<br />

petroleum ether <strong>of</strong> S. lappa followed by 3.00 from those<br />

treated with acetone extract <strong>of</strong> S. lappa. These number<br />

were statistically lower than 11.33 pupae in the control.<br />

The fruits treated with petroleum ether extract <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

<strong>harmala</strong> had 7.00 pupae, which were still significantly<br />

lower than those in the control but not from the remaining<br />

treatments. (Table-2). The trend <strong>of</strong> adult emergence was<br />

similar to that <strong>of</strong> pupae. Minimum and significantly lower<br />

16


Pak. Entomol. Vol. 28, No.1, 2006<br />

number <strong>of</strong> adult emerged at the same treatment in<br />

which pupae were minimum and significantly lower<br />

than other treatments and control.<br />

Settling response by B. zonata on guava fruits treated<br />

with 0.5% concentration <strong>of</strong> petroleum ether, acetone<br />

and ethanol extracts <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong>, V. <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

and S. lappa in a free choice test is given in Table-3.<br />

It reveled that flies settled on fruits treated with 0.5%<br />

Petroleum ether extract <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong> and Petroleum<br />

ether extracts. In these treatments only 0.1300 and<br />

0.0767 flies settled on the treated fruits which were<br />

statistically lower than the 0.8467 flies settled on the<br />

untreated fruits. In other treatment, though, lower<br />

number <strong>of</strong> flies settled on the treated fruits were not<br />

statistically different to that on the untreated one.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> pupae recovered in all these<br />

treatments were significantly lower than the pupae<br />

obtained in the control except for the pupae<br />

recovered from fruits treated with acetone extract <strong>of</strong><br />

P. <strong>harmala</strong>. The lowest number (1.667) pupae were<br />

obtained from the fruits treated with acetone extract<br />

<strong>of</strong> S. lappa, however, were statistically similar to the<br />

pupae recovered in the other treatments except<br />

control. Almost, similar trend was observed in the<br />

adult emergence. Significantly lower number <strong>of</strong><br />

adults emergence in all treatments as compared to<br />

those in the control.<br />

The above results showed that there was no<br />

correlation between the number <strong>of</strong> adult flies settled<br />

and progeny recovered. This phenomenon clearly<br />

indicate that some <strong>of</strong> the treatments affected both<br />

settling as well as egg laying response while others,<br />

were partially effective. Extracts <strong>of</strong> the tested plants,<br />

when applied at 1% to guava fruits, significantly<br />

reduced the settling <strong>of</strong> fruit fly on treated fruits as<br />

compared to the untreated ones. However, fruit fly<br />

adults settled on the treated fruits with different<br />

extracts were statistically similar to each other<br />

(Table-3). Petroleum ether extract <strong>of</strong> V. <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

with 0.2233 adults ranked first in showing non<br />

preference by test insect followed by 0.2467, 0.2867<br />

and 0.3500 adults on guava fruits treated with 1%<br />

ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong>, acetone extracts <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

<strong>harmala</strong>, ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> V. <strong>of</strong>ficianalis and<br />

petroleum ether extract <strong>of</strong> P. <strong>harmala</strong>, respectively.<br />

When the fruits used in this study were keep<br />

separately in jars with sand at their bottom,<br />

statistically similar pupae were recovered in all<br />

treatments as compared to those in the control except<br />

<strong>of</strong> S. lappa where no pupae were recovered. Hence,<br />

when there were no pupae, therefore, were no adult<br />

recovery, though the number <strong>of</strong> flies settled on these<br />

fruits were statistically similar to those on the other<br />

treatments.<br />

Table-1. Mean number <strong>of</strong> Bactrocera zonata settled and progeny recovered<br />

from untreated Guava fruits and those treated with 2% concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

petroleum ether, acetone, and ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> different plants in a free choice<br />

test<br />

Plant<br />

Mean Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Solvent 2% Adu. Settled Pupae Recovered Adu. Emerged<br />

Peganum <strong>harmala</strong><br />

Petroleum ether 0.5533 a 7.000 b 7.000 bc<br />

Acetone 0.4433 a 8.000 ab 7.000 bc<br />

Ethanol 0.4433 a 2.667 c 1.333 d<br />

Valariana <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

Petroleum ether 0.5500 a 11.33 a 9.667 ab<br />

Acetone 0.2600 a 8.33 ab 6.333 c<br />

Ethanol 0.3967 a 10.33 ab 10.00 a<br />

Sassurea lappa<br />

Petroleum ether 0.2633 a 2.667 c 2.333 d<br />

Acetone 0.3733 a 3.000 c 2.000 d<br />

Ethanol 0.6633 a 9.000 ab 8.000 abc<br />

Control 0.6867 a 11.33 a 7.667a<br />

Each value is a mean <strong>of</strong> three replications, 10 pairs per replication. Mean<br />

values among the columns followed by the same letters are not significantly<br />

different at α = 0.05, having LSD value = 0.4912 for settling, LSD value = 3.695<br />

for pupae, & LSD value = 2.639 for adult<br />

Table-2. Mean number <strong>of</strong> Bactrocera zonata settled and progeny recovered<br />

from untreated Guava fruits and those treated with 1% concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

petroleum ether, acetone, and ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> different plants in a free choice<br />

test<br />

Plant<br />

Mean Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Solvent 2% Adu. Settled Pupae Recovered Adu. Emerged<br />

Peganum <strong>harmala</strong><br />

Petroleum ether 0.3500 b 3.667 abc 3.667 ab<br />

Acetone 0.2867 b 3.667 abc 2.333 ab<br />

Ethanol 0.2467 b 6.670 bc 1.000 ab<br />

Valariana <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

Petroleum ether 0.2233 b 2.667 abc 2.333 ab<br />

Acetone 0.5167 b 8.000 abc 6.667 ab<br />

Ethanol 0.2867 b 4.000 abc 3.667 ab<br />

Sassurea lappa<br />

Petroleum ether 0.4367 b 0.000 c 0.0000 b<br />

Acetone 0.4333 b 3.667 abc 3.667 ab<br />

Ethanol 0.4333 b 10.33 a 8.000 a<br />

Control 1.0200 a 8.333 ab 7.667 a<br />

Each value is a mean <strong>of</strong> three replications, 10 pairs per replication. Mean<br />

values among the columns followed by the same letters are not significantly<br />

different at α = 0.05, having LSD value =0.3431 for settling, LSD value = 7.041<br />

for pupae, and LSD value = 6.127 for adult<br />

Table-3. Mean number <strong>of</strong> Bactrocera zonata settled and progeny recovered<br />

from untreated Guava fruits and those treated with 0.5% concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

petroleum ether, acetone, and ethanol extract <strong>of</strong> different plants in a free choice<br />

test<br />

Plant<br />

Mean Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Solvent 2% Adu. Settled Pupae Recovered Adu. Emerged<br />

Peganum <strong>harmala</strong><br />

Petroleum ether 0.1300 b 4.667 b 3.333 b<br />

Acetone 0.4900 ab 12.67 ab 10.33 b<br />

Ethanol 0.4633 ab 8.333 b 7.333 b<br />

Valariana <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

Petroleum ether 0.433 ab 3.000 b 2.000 b<br />

Acetone 0.3567 ab 7.000 b 6.333 b<br />

Ethanol 0.3133 ab 3.333 b 2.333 b<br />

Sassurea lappa<br />

Petroleum ether 0.5133 ab 3.000 b 2.000 b<br />

Acetone 0.1767 b 1.667 b 0.000 b<br />

Ethanol 0.5567 ab 5.000 b 3.333 b<br />

Control 0.8467 a 23.00 a 22.00 a<br />

Each value is a mean <strong>of</strong> three replications, 10 pairs per replication. Mean<br />

values among the columns followed by the same letters are not significantly<br />

different at α = 0.05, having LSD value =0.5287 for settling, LSD value = 12.01<br />

for pupae, and LSD value = 9.910 for adult<br />

17


Pak. Entomol. Vol. 28, No.1, 2006<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

To reduce losses by fruit flies, farmers mostly use<br />

synthetic insecticides which cause serious social and<br />

environmental repercussions. Male Inhalation<br />

Technique (MIT), Bait Application Technique<br />

(BAT), sanitation <strong>of</strong> orchards are very effective and<br />

friendly management measures but are not adapted<br />

by the majority <strong>of</strong> farmers, therefore, it is felt that<br />

fruit flies can be effectively controlled only through<br />

integrated pest management using environmental<br />

friendly materials to replace insecticides.<br />

Among various plant extracts applied to guava fruit<br />

in the laboratory studies, Valariana <strong>of</strong>ficianalis<br />

extract in acetone and petroleum ether significantly<br />

repelled the fruit flies from the treated fruit.<br />

Petroleum ether and acetone extracts <strong>of</strong> Saussurea<br />

lappa although, was not effective in reducing the<br />

settling <strong>of</strong> flies on treated fruit, it significantly<br />

affected the pupal formation and adult emergence.<br />

This indicated that Saussurea lappa had suppressed<br />

egg laying. Chander (1999), Harish (2000) found that<br />

these plants oil significantly repelled major insect<br />

pests <strong>of</strong> stored grain and growth <strong>of</strong> certain stored<br />

grain insect pests was impaired . Neem seed kernel<br />

extracts worked as oviposition deterrent to<br />

Bactrocera curcurbitae and B. dorsalis on pumpkin<br />

and guava, respectively. The acetone extract <strong>of</strong> deoiled<br />

kernel powder significantly deterred oviposition<br />

by both species at 0.5% and 1.25% (Shivendra et al.,<br />

1998). Renden et al. (1998) investigated a strong<br />

negative effect <strong>of</strong> neem based insecticides on the<br />

oviposition, egg development and survival <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adults.<br />

In the present studies, the tested plant derivatives<br />

significantly affected the growth <strong>of</strong> fruit flies.<br />

Similar, results were obtained by Hassan (1998),<br />

according to him, neem seed kernel extract (NSKE)<br />

negatively affected the 1 st and 2 nd instar larvae <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Queensland fruit fly on persimmon. A high<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> adults emerging from the treated pupae<br />

showed wing deformation preventing them from<br />

flying. Shakunthala et al. (2001) demonstrated<br />

remarkable changes in the size and morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

the reproductive organs <strong>of</strong> adult flies when Acorus<br />

calamus extract were used against B. cucurbitae.<br />

10% ether extract <strong>of</strong> Peganum <strong>harmala</strong> significantly<br />

increased adult mortality, retarded rate <strong>of</strong><br />

development, reduced adult emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

Callosobruchus chinensis.<br />

Some botanicals are also used as attractants for fruit<br />

flies. Kardinam (1999) found that Melaleuca<br />

bracteala oil containing methyl eugenol was effective in<br />

trapping fruit flies. Shivendra et al. (2001) tested five<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> Acorus calamus oil against Bactrocera<br />

cucurbitae and B. dorsalis. Fl fractions were attractive to<br />

male Bactrocera dorsalis. FII (acoragermacrone) was<br />

more attractive to female flies.<br />

LITERATURE CITED<br />

Atwal, A.S., 1976. Agricultural pests <strong>of</strong> India & Southeast<br />

Asia, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.<br />

Bateman, M.A., 1972. The ecology <strong>of</strong> fruit flies, Ann. Rev.<br />

Ent., 17: 493-518.<br />

Chander, H., 1999. Laboratory evaluation <strong>of</strong> plant extracts as<br />

repellent to the rust flour beetle, Tribolium<br />

castaneum on jute fabric, Internat. Pest Contr., 41<br />

(1): 18-20.<br />

Dhaliwal, G.S. and R.A. Heinrich, 1998. Critical Issues in<br />

insect management. Common wealth publishers,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

Harish, C., 2000. Repellency <strong>of</strong> different plant extracts and<br />

commercial formulations used as prophylactic spray<br />

to protect bagged grain against Tribolium<br />

castaneum, J. Food. Sci., and Techa. Mysore. 6(37):<br />

582-585.<br />

Hashmi, A.A., 2001. Integrated pest management in the 21 st<br />

century, PARC publication, Islamabad.<br />

Hassan, E., 1998. Insecticidal toxicity <strong>of</strong> neem seed kernel<br />

extract (NSKE) on Bactrocera tryoni (Frogg.)<br />

(Diptera: Tephritidae) and repellency on persimmon<br />

fruit. Zeitschrift-fur-Pflanzenkrankheiten-und-<br />

Pflanzenschutz. 105 (4): 411-416.<br />

Kardinan, A., 1999. Prospect <strong>of</strong> Melaleuca bracteata leaf oil<br />

as fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis control in Indonesia,<br />

Journal Penelitian and Pengembangan Pertanian.,<br />

18(1): 10-17.<br />

Renden, E.J., B.D. Roitberg and E.J. Randen, 1998. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

a neem Azadirachta india based insecticide on<br />

oviposition deterrence, survival, behavior and<br />

reproduction <strong>of</strong> adult western cherry fruit fly<br />

(Diptera: Tephritidae), J. Eco. Ent., 91(1): 123-130.<br />

Shakunthala, N. and J. Thomas, 2001. Ovipositior deterrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Acorus calamus L. on melon flu, Bactrocera<br />

cucurbitae, Insect Environm., 39(2): 145-148.<br />

Shivendra, S. and R.P. Singh, 1998. Neem Azadirachta indica<br />

seed kernel extracts and azadirachtin as oviposition<br />

deterrents against the melon fly Bactrocera<br />

cucurbitae and the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera<br />

dorsalis. Phytoparasitica, 26(3): 191-197.<br />

Shivendra, S., S.S. Sehgal and S. Singh, 2001. Investigations<br />

on constituents <strong>of</strong> Acorus calamus root oil as<br />

attractants to melonfly, Bactrocera cucurbitae and<br />

oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Indian J. Ent.,<br />

63(3): 340-344.<br />

Syed, R.A., 1970. Studies on the trypetids and their natural<br />

enemies in West Pakistan. Dacus spp. <strong>of</strong> lesser<br />

importance, Pak. J. Zool., 2: 17-24.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!