28.01.2015 Views

David Homan 1 of 8 “Giauque's achievements in the field of ...

David Homan 1 of 8 “Giauque's achievements in the field of ...

David Homan 1 of 8 “Giauque's achievements in the field of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

“Giauque’s <strong>achievements</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>field</strong> <strong>of</strong> chemical <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics and<br />

especially his work on <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> matter at low temperatures and his<br />

closely allied studies <strong>of</strong> entropy comprise one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most significant<br />

contributions to modern physical chemistry.” –Pr<strong>of</strong>essor A. Tiselius <strong>in</strong> his<br />

1949 Nobel Prize presentation speech to William Francis Giauque<br />

Giauque’s Nobel Prize:<br />

William Francis Giauque, born May 12 th , 1895, <strong>in</strong> Niagara Falls, Canada, was awarded<br />

<strong>the</strong> Nobel Prize <strong>in</strong> chemistry for 1949. The award recognized many years worth <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

discovery and many contributions to chemistry especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entropy <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />

substances, particularly at very low temperatures. Giauque’s later experiments were <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

greatly while he was still a graduate student by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Raymond T. Birge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong><br />

California at Berkeley’s physics department. Through Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Birge Giauque obta<strong>in</strong>ed an<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> applicability <strong>of</strong> quantum statistics to <strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolute entropy<br />

<strong>of</strong> any gas <strong>of</strong> diatomic molecules from spectroscopic data. He realized this would be an ideal<br />

1 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

reference to compare experimental values <strong>of</strong> entropy. As a result, he set out to test <strong>the</strong> third law<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics.<br />

Through amaz<strong>in</strong>g experimental skill he was able to design techniques for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

accurate measurements at temperatures near<strong>in</strong>g absolute zero. While prepar<strong>in</strong>g to present a<br />

sem<strong>in</strong>ar on <strong>the</strong> relationship between magnetism and <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics <strong>in</strong> 1924, Giauque<br />

postulated about adiabatic demagnetization. He freely discussed his thoughts about adiabatic<br />

demagnetization with colleagues <strong>in</strong> Berkeley where he was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor, but did not publish a<br />

paper on his idea until 1927. In March <strong>of</strong> 1933, while work<strong>in</strong>g with a student named D.P.<br />

MacDougall, Giauque f<strong>in</strong>ally carried out <strong>the</strong> first adiabatic demagnetization experiment yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.25 K. Adiabatic demagnetization was a means to allow Giauque to pursue his primary <strong>in</strong>terest:<br />

entropy and <strong>the</strong> third law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics. He was a meticulous experimenter who took<br />

extremely accurate absolute measurements with his goal be<strong>in</strong>g an accuracy <strong>of</strong> 0.1%.<br />

Giauque’s <strong>field</strong> <strong>of</strong> study was not just limited to low temperature entropy measurements,<br />

but also to measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> heat capacities and heats <strong>of</strong> transition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> halogen acids from very<br />

low temperatures to <strong>the</strong>ir boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts, study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spectra <strong>of</strong> diatomic molecules lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> isotopes <strong>of</strong> oxygen <strong>in</strong> 1929, and determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> difference <strong>in</strong> entropy<br />

between <strong>the</strong> glass form and <strong>the</strong> crystall<strong>in</strong>e form <strong>of</strong> glycer<strong>in</strong>e. Overall, throughout his career he<br />

published scientific work <strong>in</strong> 75 papers.<br />

The Entropy <strong>of</strong> Hydrogen chloride:<br />

The purpose for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> calorimetric entropy <strong>of</strong> a halogen acid was <strong>the</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> third law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics as well as to compare <strong>the</strong> data collected with <strong>the</strong> previous data<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from various <strong>the</strong>ories with <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> spectroscopic data. Hydrogen chloride was used<br />

2 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> its spectra measurements and <strong>the</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> its spectra<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation. However, <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> pure anhydrous hydrogen chloride <strong>in</strong> quantities large<br />

enough for <strong>the</strong> experiment was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most difficult challenges solved for this particular<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation by Giauque. 3.5 moles were required to fill <strong>the</strong> calorimeter, but as much as 10<br />

moles was used to account for losses throughout <strong>the</strong> experiment.<br />

The hydrogen chloride was extensively processed to prepare it for measurement. Two<br />

problems Giauque ran <strong>in</strong>to dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> purification process were: <strong>the</strong> condensed hydrogen<br />

chloride “was <strong>of</strong> a reddish p<strong>in</strong>k color” and solid white particles appeared <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> colorless liquid<br />

upon melt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>refore h<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g at impurities. Giauque later hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that <strong>the</strong> reddish p<strong>in</strong>k<br />

material was an unstable crystall<strong>in</strong>e form <strong>of</strong> hydrogen chloride only present when <strong>the</strong> hydrogen<br />

chloride was at <strong>the</strong> temperature <strong>of</strong> liquid air. The white particles were hypo<strong>the</strong>sized to be<br />

phosphorus oxychloride which can be prepared by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>of</strong> hot hydrogen chloride with<br />

phosphorus pentoxide.<br />

Once Giauque and Wiebe had obta<strong>in</strong>ed purified anhydrous hydrogen chloride he<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> vapor pressures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid form. The results are given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table below<br />

(Figure 1). They calculated <strong>the</strong> pressures given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth column us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> equation: log P<br />

(cm Hg) = -1114/T – 1.285logT – 0.0009467T + 11.00500. The constants were chosen to fit <strong>the</strong><br />

observed data.<br />

3 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

T, K P obs. (cm Hg) P calc. T obs. - T calc.<br />

132.48 0.558 0.554 -0.05<br />

132.82 0.589 0.580 -0.12<br />

135.2 0.787 0.797 0.10<br />

139.23 1.308 1.310 0.01<br />

143.00 2.044 2.041 -0.01<br />

145.77 2.782 2.783 0.00<br />

148.44 3.705 3.709 0.01<br />

154.29 6.692 6.710 0.03<br />

155.04 7.221 7.215 -0.01<br />

158.91 10.370 10.371 0.00<br />

10.371<br />

Figure 1. Vapor Pressures <strong>of</strong> Solid Hydrogen Chloride (Giauque and Wiebe, 105)<br />

He also determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> vapor pressures <strong>of</strong> liquid hydrogen chloride and <strong>the</strong>se results are<br />

given <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The calculated pressures given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth column were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong><br />

equation developed by Henn<strong>in</strong>g and Stock 1 : log P (mm Hg) = -905.53/T + 175logT – 0.005077T<br />

+ 4.65739.<br />

T, K P obs. (cm Hg) P calc. T obs. - T calc.<br />

158.91 10.371 10.357 -0.02<br />

164.62 16.29 16.260 -0.03<br />

169.28 22.98 22.930 -0.03<br />

173.95 31.71 31.720 0.00<br />

178.53 42.81 42.830 0.01<br />

181.84 52.64 52.650 0.00<br />

185.17 64.34 64.290 -0.01<br />

188.41 77.48 77.470 0.00<br />

191.96 94.39 94.280 -0.02<br />

195.93 116.510 116.330 -0.03<br />

Figure 2. Vapor Pressures <strong>of</strong> Liquid Hydrogen Chloride (Giauque and Wiebe, 106)<br />

For <strong>the</strong> vapor pressure measurements a copper shea<strong>the</strong>d glass apparatus was used, but it<br />

was not employed for <strong>the</strong> calorimetric measurements because <strong>of</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs at<br />

Giauque’s laboratory that glass calorimeters were <strong>in</strong>ferior ma<strong>in</strong>ly because <strong>the</strong> accuracy is<br />

decreased by <strong>the</strong> poor <strong>the</strong>rmal conductivity. So, for <strong>the</strong> calorimetric measurements, Giauque and<br />

Wiebe designed a sophisticated apparatus made from gold sheet 0.75 mm <strong>in</strong> thickness with<br />

welded seams. In order to correct a known source <strong>of</strong> error energy was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

4 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

system. The source <strong>of</strong> this energy was a comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>rmometer-heater that also allowed <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>in</strong>tervals. This resistance <strong>the</strong>rmometer, after calibration, was found<br />

to be so precise that its accuracy was with<strong>in</strong> 0.05 K.<br />

Next <strong>the</strong>y obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> heat capacity <strong>of</strong> hydrogen chloride us<strong>in</strong>g his new calorimeter.<br />

Because <strong>the</strong>y knew energy was be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> system <strong>the</strong>y were able to calculate <strong>the</strong> heat<br />

capacities with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> 17.29 K to 188.07 K. The data is presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 3. The<br />

density <strong>of</strong> solid hydrogen chloride was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by Simon and Simson 2 and <strong>the</strong> density <strong>of</strong><br />

liquid hydrogen chloride has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed by Baumg and Perrot 3 .<br />

T, K C p /mole (cal/deg) T, K C p /mole (cal/deg) T, K C p /mole (cal/deg)<br />

17.29 1.031 67.85 5.848 117.30 10.14<br />

21.34 1.637 72.63 6.159 123.92 10.46<br />

24.71 2.066 75.46 6.329 131.18 10.67<br />

26.85 2.330 77.65 6.526 138.79 10.95<br />

28.10 2.491 80.25 6.712 148.90 11.34<br />

31.89 2.943 82.63 6.894 155.06 11.65<br />

35.82 3.393 84.69 7.053 158.91 Melt<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

39.95 3.794 87.70 7.327 163.72 13.89<br />

44.20 4.132 88.79 7.410 171.45 13.95<br />

48.62 4.472 92.83 7.786 171.74 13.95<br />

51.23 4.677 92.96 7.849 178.64 14.01<br />

56.01 5.070 98.36 Transition 185.20 14.07<br />

58.94 5.231 103.01 9.64 188.07 Boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

63.31 5.550<br />

Figure 3. Heat Capacity <strong>of</strong> Hydrogen Chloride (Giauque and Wiebe, 110)<br />

For <strong>the</strong>ir calculation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entropy <strong>of</strong> hydrogen chloride, Giauque and Wiebe determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

heats <strong>of</strong> transition, fusion, and vaporization. Heats <strong>of</strong> fusion and transition were measured by<br />

<strong>in</strong>putt<strong>in</strong>g heat at a temperature below <strong>the</strong> melt<strong>in</strong>g or transition temperature and end<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put<br />

just above. The heat <strong>of</strong> transition was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be 98.36 K and <strong>the</strong> average ÈH was 284.3<br />

cal mol -1 . The heat <strong>of</strong> fusion was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be 158.91 K and <strong>the</strong> average ÈH was 476.0 cal<br />

1 Henn<strong>in</strong>g and Stock, Z. Physik, 4, 226 (1921).<br />

2 Simon and Simson, Z. Physik, 21, 168 (1924).<br />

5 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

mol -1 . To calculate <strong>the</strong> heat <strong>of</strong> vaporization at atmospheric pressure two methods were used, but<br />

both methods determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> material evaporated by absorption <strong>in</strong> a solution <strong>of</strong><br />

sodium hydroxide. The results for methods I and II were 3859 ± 9 cal mol -1 and 3860 ± 4 cal<br />

mol -1 respectively. Giauque and Wiebe felt more confidence <strong>in</strong> method II because <strong>the</strong> results<br />

from this method showed a smaller deviation from <strong>the</strong> mean than <strong>the</strong> results from method I.<br />

The entropy <strong>of</strong> hydrogen chloride was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by graphical <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equation S<br />

= fC p dlnT (from 0 to T) plus <strong>the</strong> entropy changes accompany<strong>in</strong>g each change <strong>of</strong> state. The<br />

Debye function (C p ≅ T 3 ) was employed below <strong>the</strong> lowest temperature <strong>of</strong> measurement.<br />

Giaque’s and Wiebe’s entropy calculations are summated <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.<br />

Solid stable below 98.36 K S (cal K -1 mol -1 )<br />

0 to 16 K, extrapolation 0.30<br />

16 K to 98.36 K, graphical 7.06<br />

Transition 284.3/98.35 = 2.89<br />

Solid stable above 98.36 K<br />

98.36 K to 158.91 K, graphical 5.05<br />

Fusion 476.0/158.91 = 3.00<br />

Liquid<br />

158.91 K to 188.07 K, graphical 2.36<br />

Vaporization, 3860/88.07 = 20.52<br />

Entropy <strong>of</strong> HCl (g) at boil<strong>in</strong>g pt. =<br />

41.2 +/- 0.1 E.U.<br />

Figure 4. Calculation <strong>of</strong> Entropy <strong>of</strong> Hydrogen Chloride (Giauque and Wiebe, 116)<br />

Giauque and Wiebe tested <strong>the</strong>ir results by calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> entropy for hydrogen chloride<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g spectroscopic data. Us<strong>in</strong>g two different methods, <strong>the</strong>y concluded that <strong>the</strong> value for entropy<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spectroscopic data was very similar to <strong>the</strong>ir calorimetric value. They summarized this<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g by say<strong>in</strong>g, “The close agreement <strong>of</strong> our experimental and <strong>the</strong>oretical values is very good<br />

evidence, not only for <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical considerations as closely approximat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

actual properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substance, but also for <strong>the</strong> third law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamics.” They fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

3 Baumg and Perrot, J. chim. phys., 12, 225 (1914).<br />

6 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

tested <strong>the</strong>ir results by calculat<strong>in</strong>g ÈS us<strong>in</strong>g Gibbs free energy values for chlor<strong>in</strong>e and hydrogen.<br />

The value obta<strong>in</strong>ed for hydrogen chloride us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Gibbs <strong>in</strong>formation was 44.5 cal K -1 mol -1<br />

which is very similar to <strong>the</strong>ir calorimetric value.<br />

7 <strong>of</strong> 8


<strong>David</strong> <strong>Homan</strong><br />

Works Cited<br />

“Biography <strong>of</strong> William Francis Giauque.” URL:<br />

http://www.nobel.se/chemistry/laureates/1949/giauque-bio.html.<br />

Giauque, W.F. and R. Wiebe. “The Entropy <strong>of</strong> Hydrogen Chloride. Heat Capacity from 16°K.<br />

to Boil<strong>in</strong>g Po<strong>in</strong>t. Heat <strong>of</strong> Vaporization. Vapor Pressures <strong>of</strong> Solid and Liquid.” Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Chemical Society 50:101-22.<br />

“Noble Prize <strong>in</strong> Chemistry 1949- Prize Presentation.” URL:<br />

http://www.nobel.se/chemistry/laureates/1949/press.html.<br />

Pitzer, Kenneth S. and <strong>David</strong> A. Shirley. “William Francis Giauque, May 12, 1895-March 28,<br />

1982.” URL: http://bob.nap.edu/html/biomems/wgiauque.html.<br />

8 <strong>of</strong> 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!