28.01.2015 Views

Satanism Today - An Encyclopedia of Religion, Folklore and Popular ...

Satanism Today - An Encyclopedia of Religion, Folklore and Popular ...

Satanism Today - An Encyclopedia of Religion, Folklore and Popular ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B<br />

Backward Masking<br />

Backward masking refers to the insertion <strong>of</strong><br />

subliminal messages into a piece <strong>of</strong> music by<br />

recording it “backwards” onto the soundtrack. A<br />

message so recorded can be detected <strong>and</strong> thereby<br />

“unmasked” by playing the song in reverse.<br />

According to some conservative Christians, rock<br />

music companies routinely incorporate Satanic<br />

messages into their albums for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

leading innocent young people into the service <strong>of</strong><br />

the Prince <strong>of</strong> Darkness via the commission <strong>of</strong><br />

antisocial acts.<br />

Some experimental musicians had utilized<br />

reversed recording at least as far back as the 1960s,<br />

but for the innocuous purpose <strong>of</strong> creating weird<br />

sounds rather than for the purpose <strong>of</strong> broadcasting<br />

secret messages. Christians who disliked rock<br />

music had originally denounced the genre as<br />

Satanic due to the unconscious influence <strong>of</strong> what<br />

was described as its “Druid beat.” This critique<br />

shifted to denouncing the influence <strong>of</strong> backward<br />

masked messages during the early 1980s. The first<br />

book-length exposé was Jacob Aranza’s 1983<br />

Backward Masking Unmasked.<br />

In the same year that Aranza’s book was<br />

published, the b<strong>and</strong> Mötley Crüe responded to<br />

what was already a popular craze by jokingly<br />

inscribing their Shout at the Devil album: “this<br />

record may contain backward masking.” However,<br />

efforts to parody <strong>and</strong> ridicule the notion were<br />

19<br />

quickly outdone by the proponents <strong>of</strong> backward<br />

masking themselves. Thus in 1986, for example, an<br />

Ohio evangelist led some seventy-five youngsters<br />

in the mass immolation <strong>of</strong> albums containing the<br />

theme song from the old television show Mr. Ed.<br />

(Certain fundamentalists believe that talking<br />

animals are diabolical.) This particular minister<br />

asserted that when “A Horse is a Horse” is played<br />

in reverse, one can clearly hear the message,<br />

“Someone sung this song for Satan.” The silliness<br />

<strong>of</strong> this exegetical approach was also evident in the<br />

pronouncements <strong>of</strong> certain writers who claimed<br />

to find infernal backward masking in country <strong>and</strong><br />

western music.<br />

There are several obvious problems with this<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view. In the first place, it assumes the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a diabolical conspiracy that is implausible<br />

to almost everyone outside the conservative<br />

Christian subculture. In the second place, even if<br />

such mischief was actually taking place in Satanic<br />

recording studios, psychological studies have<br />

demonstrated that such messages—infernal or<br />

otherwise—have absolutely no influence on<br />

listeners’ behaviors. This second point was highlighted<br />

by several court cases involving accusations<br />

<strong>of</strong> backward masking.<br />

Beginning in the 1980s, a series <strong>of</strong> different<br />

lawsuits that proposed to sue various heavy metal<br />

groups <strong>and</strong> their recording studios for the supposedly<br />

baneful effects <strong>of</strong> their music were thrown

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!