Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

28.01.2015 Views

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material costs drop from an initial $100/kWh to a mature $80/kWh, the total BOS costs would be approximately $140/kWh and $100/kWh, respectively, for a nominal 8-hour system. The third cost component of the VRB system is the PCS, which is typically in the range of $250/kW to $300/kW at the 1 MW level, depending upon specifications such as power factor control and overload rating. These costs are expected to decline due to advances in technology and increased production quantities of power transistors. PCS costs corresponding to initial and mature VRB production are taken as $250/kW and $200/kW, respectively, representing both the PCS cost trend overall and the cost benefits of quantity orders from VRB suppliers. Furthermore, internal PCS costs for components such as enclosures and gate driver boards do not scale proportionately with power rating, and consequently systems rated at higher power levels may be procured at correspondingly lower costs. An EPRI investigation by Bechtel [Stolte, 1985] produced a relationship for scaling PCS costs in $/kW: PCS Cost = (Base Cost) x (P) n where the Base Cost represents a 1 MW system and the power rating P is given in MW. For purposes of this analysis, the exponent is taken as -0.2 for “advanced” systems. For example, assuming a 1 MW Base Cost of $200/kW, a 10 MW PCS would have a cost savings of 37% and cost $130/kW. The above relationship reflects the “incremental” (or “marginal”) cost of additional power capability for the PCS, but there is no corresponding relationship for the incremental stack cost. Stacks would be manufactured in standard sizes (such as the 42 kW SEI stacks), and a given system would be made up of multiples of the base stack component. Each of these would be produced on the same manufacturing line and would have identical per unit costs. The 1 to 5 kW stacks to be manufactured for Vantech by Schmitt Industries would be a departure from this concept, since these smaller stacks would involve processes having similar fixed costs with the larger stacks (e.g., parts assembly, molding, and tooling), and this would result in higher costs per stack and higher costs per kW. However, these small systems would be targeted for applications outside the scope of the present analysis, which is focused on much larger T&D applications. Incremental costs associated with VRB energy ratings other than 8 hours relate to the differential electrolyte cost, but would also include the marginal cost of tanks and supporting foundations. Plumbing and pump costs would not change for systems rated for different discharge times since these would be sized according to the flow design for the stack. A reasonable approximation of incremental energy capital cost would be about $50/kWh. For example, while a mature 1 MW / 8 MWh system would have BOS costs of $140/kWh, a 1 MW / 10 MWh system would cost only about (140*8 + 50*2)/10 = $122/kWh. Incremental costs apply conversely to systems rated at less than 8 hours due to savings in electrolyte quantities. Vanadium Redox Battery 28

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material Prototype VRB system costs will be significantly higher than those discussed above since they include one-time engineering costs, they would be based upon relatively conservative design parameters, and they would use components without the cost-savings advantage of mass production or quantity purchases from sub-suppliers. The VRB cost estimate of $11 million for the 2.5 MW / 10 MWh Boulder City project is taken as a representative prototype project cost. Based upon the considerations above, the PCS cost (reduced from a 1 MW base cost of $300/kW) would represent about $250/kW, or $625,000. Using a baseline BOS cost for an 8-hour prototype system of $300/kWh, the BOS for the 4-hour prototype would be about $550/kWh, or $5.5M. The remaining $4.9M would be to procure prototype non-mass produced stacks at about $1,960/kW. Sample system costs for representative sizes and applications are shown in Table 5, including Prototypes, “First of a Kind” (FOAK) commercial systems and “Nth of a Kind” (NOAK) mature systems. Prototype, FOAK and NOAK stack costs are assumed to be $1960/kW, $450/kW and $300/kW, respectively. Baseline PCS costs (representing a 1 MW PCS rating) are assumed to be $300/kW (Prototype), $250/kW (FOAK) and $250/kW (NOAK), and these are adjusted using the Bechtel relationship described above. Baseline 8-hour BOS costs are assumed to be $300/kW (Prototype), $140/kWh (FOAK) and $100/kW (NOAK), and these are adjusted to account for discharge times. Note that some scenarios have discharge times of less than 8 hours, and calculated costs reflect the lower BOS costs. However, the costs of these systems are higher on a $/kWh basis since the energy storage capacity is smaller. O&M Costs VRB maintenance costs are likewise subject to uncertainty due to limited field experience. Maintenance would be limited to periodic inspections and minor repairs as necessary. All systems are operated unattended. For purposes of this analysis, annual fixed maintenance cost is assumed to be the same on a per-system basis for the T&D size ranges considered here. Technician travel time and per-diem costs would be the major component of inspection cost, and the additional inspection time required for larger systems are assumed to be negligible. Inspection costs for one technician would be about $1000 per day, required 12 times per year for prototype systems, 4 times per year for initial commercial systems (FOAK) and 2 times per year for mature systems (NOAK). Charging energy is assumed to be at off-peak wholesale pricing of $0.020/kWh and, with an AC/AC roundtrip efficiency of 70%, variable O&M costs are therefore $0.029/kWh. Fixed and variable O&M costs using the above assumptions are shown in Table 5. Vanadium Redox Battery 29

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

Prototype VRB system costs will be significantly higher than those discussed above since<br />

they include one-time engineering costs, they would be based upon relatively<br />

conservative design parameters, and they would use <strong>com</strong>ponents without the cost-savings<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> mass production <strong>or</strong> quantity purchases from sub-suppliers. The VRB cost<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> $11 million <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the 2.5 MW / 10 MWh Boulder City project is taken as a<br />

representative prototype project cost. Based upon the considerations above, the PCS cost<br />

(reduced from a 1 MW base cost <strong>of</strong> $300/kW) would represent about $250/kW, <strong>or</strong><br />

$625,000. Using a baseline BOS cost <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> an 8-hour prototype system <strong>of</strong> $300/kWh, the<br />

BOS <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the 4-hour prototype would be about $550/kWh, <strong>or</strong> $5.5M. The remaining<br />

$4.9M would be to procure prototype non-mass produced stacks at about $1,960/kW.<br />

Sample system costs <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> representative sizes and applications are shown in Table 5,<br />

including Prototypes, “First <strong>of</strong> a Kind” (FOAK) <strong>com</strong>mercial systems and “Nth <strong>of</strong> a Kind”<br />

(NOAK) mature systems. Prototype, FOAK and NOAK stack costs are assumed to be<br />

$1960/kW, $450/kW and $300/kW, respectively. Baseline PCS costs (representing a 1<br />

MW PCS rating) are assumed to be $300/kW (Prototype), $250/kW (FOAK) and<br />

$250/kW (NOAK), and these are adjusted using the Bechtel relationship described above.<br />

Baseline 8-hour BOS costs are assumed to be $300/kW (Prototype), $140/kWh (FOAK)<br />

and $100/kW (NOAK), and these are adjusted to account <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> discharge times. Note that<br />

some scenarios have discharge times <strong>of</strong> less than 8 hours, and calculated costs reflect the<br />

lower BOS costs. However, the costs <strong>of</strong> these systems are higher on a $/kWh basis since<br />

the energy st<strong>or</strong>age capacity is smaller.<br />

O&M Costs<br />

VRB maintenance costs are likewise subject to uncertainty due to limited field<br />

experience. Maintenance would be limited to periodic inspections and min<strong>or</strong> repairs as<br />

necessary. All systems are operated unattended. F<strong>or</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this analysis, annual<br />

fixed maintenance cost is assumed to be the same on a per-system basis <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the T&D size<br />

ranges considered here. Technician travel time and per-diem costs would be the maj<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>com</strong>ponent <strong>of</strong> inspection cost, and the additional inspection time required <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> larger<br />

systems are assumed to be negligible. Inspection costs <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> one technician would be about<br />

$1000 per day, required 12 times per year <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> prototype systems, 4 times per year <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

initial <strong>com</strong>mercial systems (FOAK) and 2 times per year <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> mature systems (NOAK).<br />

Charging energy is assumed to be at <strong>of</strong>f-peak wholesale pricing <strong>of</strong> $0.020/kWh and, with<br />

an AC/AC roundtrip efficiency <strong>of</strong> 70%, variable O&M costs are there<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>e $0.029/kWh.<br />

Fixed and variable O&M costs using the above assumptions are shown in Table 5.<br />

Vanadium Redox Battery 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!