Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com
Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material • Simple open-cycle single-shaft gas turbine • Gas turbine power generator • Steel-finned tube regenerator to preheat the combustion air using exhaust heat recovery • Cooling water system with air-cooled radiator • No NO x reduction equipment Table 5 CAES Field Tests Characteristic Location Japan [21] Italy Pittsfield Sponsor New Energy Foundation ENEL Strata Power, EPRI, Nicor Storage Variable pressure using synthetic lining in concrete shaft put in coal mine tunnel Porous rock Porous sandstone caverns Design parameters 2 MW e 10 hours compression 4 hours generation 1,100 psi 57,000 cubic feet 25 MW e Testing successfully completed to measure and cycle stored compressed air Status On-going project Testing Successful (geologic formation was “disturbed” by a geothermal event and the testing was stopped somewhat prematurely) Testing successful [22] Italy ENEL operated a small 25-MW e CAES research facility plant in Italy using a porous rock storage zone that previously held a carbon dioxide “bubble”. Although the testing was successful, the testing was stopped somewhat prematurely when the geologic formation was “disturbed” by a geothermal event (which was probably induced by a nearby geothermal field extraction process). United States Several parties, including Strata Power, EPRI, Nicor, and U.S. DOE, have tested the porous sandstone caverns in Pittsfield, Illinois to determine the feasibility of the porous rock formations Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Page 19
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material for holding and cycling compressed air. The tests that EPRI performed at the Pittsfield site (after taking over the project from DOE) indicated that compressed air could be stored and cycled successfully in the St. Peter sandstone underneath the Pittsfield site. However, if air is left in this sandstone for more than three months before it is cycled, the stored air starts to react with local pyrites in the sandstone, causing a reduction in the concentration of oxygen. It has been hypothesized that, at some point, the oxidation process would be self-limiting at the site. Lessons learned During construction and initial operation of the McIntosh and Huntorf plants, the project participants conducted a number of optimization studies and analyses related to various aspects of the CAES plant engineering and operations. The lessons learned – some of them of a conceptual nature and some related to engineering details – have been presented in technical publications [23] and EPRI reports. The generic conceptual findings are summarized as follows: • CAES plants can be built within estimated funds and schedule. • The plants confirmed the expected high efficiency, reliability, availability, and competitive economics. • The underground storage caverns were developed using well-established techniques and were completed on time within budgeted funds. • Careful optimization of the CAES plant design can significantly enhance plant economics. For example, the McIntosh plant was optimized based on specified off-peak and peak hours, off-peak and on-peak power costs, fuel costs, and cost equations describing equipment and storage costs as a function of major cycle parameters. • The recuperator requires a particular care in its design. The so-called Advanced Recuperator [11] is used to prevent the tubes from operating at temperatures below the dew point. • Underground storage reservoirs can achieve negligible leak rates. • The negligible amount of sodium chloride in the compressed air drawn from salt caverns does not cause corrosion problems in the aboveground turbomachinery equipment. • The role of the house engineer involved in the CAES project is very important because there is no standard CAES plant. To minimize plant costs and to enhance the plant performance and operations, the house engineer should integrate and optimize the aboveground and underground components and systems for the specific site conditions and economic parameters of the plant owner. • CAES plants can be constructed using commercially available equipment; mainly components developed for the combustion turbine and oil/gas industries over that last 50 years. Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Page 20
- Page 164 and 165: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 166 and 167: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 168 and 169: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 170 and 171: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 172 and 173: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 174 and 175: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 176 and 177: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 178 and 179: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 180 and 181: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 182 and 183: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 184 and 185: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 186 and 187: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 188 and 189: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 190 and 191: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 193 and 194: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 195 and 196: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 197 and 198: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 199 and 200: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 201 and 202: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 203 and 204: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 205 and 206: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 207 and 208: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 209 and 210: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 211 and 212: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 213: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 217 and 218: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 219 and 220: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 221 and 222: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 223 and 224: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 225 and 226: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 227 and 228: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 229 and 230: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 231 and 232: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 233 and 234: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 235 and 236: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 237 and 238: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 239 and 240: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 241 and 242: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 243 and 244: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 245 and 246: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 247 and 248: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 249 and 250: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 251 and 252: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 253 and 254: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 255 and 256: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 257 and 258: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 259 and 260: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 261 and 262: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 263 and 264: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />
<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> holding and cycling <strong>com</strong>pressed air. The tests that EPRI per<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>med at the Pittsfield site (after<br />
taking over the project from DOE) indicated that <strong>com</strong>pressed air could be st<strong>or</strong>ed and cycled<br />
successfully in the St. Peter sandstone underneath the Pittsfield site. However, if air is left in this<br />
sandstone <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> m<strong>or</strong>e than three months be<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>e it is cycled, the st<strong>or</strong>ed air starts to react with local<br />
pyrites in the sandstone, causing a reduction in the concentration <strong>of</strong> oxygen. It has been<br />
hypothesized that, at some point, the oxidation process would be self-limiting at the site.<br />
Lessons learned<br />
During construction and initial operation <strong>of</strong> the McIntosh and Hunt<strong>or</strong>f plants, the project<br />
participants conducted a number <strong>of</strong> optimization studies and analyses related to various aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> the CAES plant engineering and operations. The lessons learned – some <strong>of</strong> them <strong>of</strong> a<br />
conceptual nature and some related to engineering details – have been presented in technical<br />
publications [23] and EPRI rep<strong>or</strong>ts.<br />
The generic conceptual findings are summarized as follows:<br />
• CAES plants can be built within estimated funds and schedule.<br />
• The plants confirmed the expected high efficiency, reliability, availability, and <strong>com</strong>petitive<br />
economics.<br />
• The underground st<strong>or</strong>age caverns were developed using well-established techniques and were<br />
<strong>com</strong>pleted on time within budgeted funds.<br />
• Careful optimization <strong>of</strong> the CAES plant design can significantly enhance plant economics.<br />
F<strong>or</strong> example, the McIntosh plant was optimized based on specified <strong>of</strong>f-peak and peak hours,<br />
<strong>of</strong>f-peak and on-peak power costs, fuel costs, and cost equations describing equipment and<br />
st<strong>or</strong>age costs as a function <strong>of</strong> maj<strong>or</strong> cycle parameters.<br />
• The recuperat<strong>or</strong> requires a particular care in its design. The so-called Advanced Recuperat<strong>or</strong><br />
[11] is used to prevent the tubes from operating at temperatures below the dew point.<br />
• Underground st<strong>or</strong>age reservoirs can achieve negligible leak rates.<br />
• The negligible amount <strong>of</strong> sodium chl<strong>or</strong>ide in the <strong>com</strong>pressed air drawn from salt caverns<br />
does not cause c<strong>or</strong>rosion problems in the aboveground turbomachinery equipment.<br />
• The role <strong>of</strong> the house engineer involved in the CAES project is very imp<strong>or</strong>tant because there<br />
is no standard CAES plant. To minimize plant costs and to enhance the plant per<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mance<br />
and operations, the house engineer should integrate and optimize the aboveground and<br />
underground <strong>com</strong>ponents and systems <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the specific site conditions and economic<br />
parameters <strong>of</strong> the plant owner.<br />
• CAES plants can be constructed using <strong>com</strong>mercially available equipment; mainly<br />
<strong>com</strong>ponents developed <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the <strong>com</strong>bustion turbine and oil/gas industries over that last 50<br />
years.<br />
Compressed Air <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>St<strong>or</strong>age</strong> (CAES) Page 20