Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com
Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material Figure 10 Damping Of Post Fault Oscillation With And Without Energy Storage The use of large-scale (100 MVAR or more) FACTS controllers to provide dynamic reactive compensation has already been demonstrated through several landmark projects. However, because of high initial cost, the alternative of a smaller scale, modularized, distributed real, and reactive VAR injection has recently received considerable attention. The key to this application is the injection of real energy storage to maintain speed of motor, which in turn reduces the inrush current for feeders heavily loaded with motor loads. This minimizes bus voltage depression and thus helps with both rotor angle and voltage stability. By providing a critical boost to the system both during faults and following the clearing of faults helps avert instability. This type of distributed dynamic reactive compensation with energy storage is particularly suitable for solving transient voltage stability problems in a weak portion of the network with a high concentration of induction motor loads during peak loading conditions. The advantage of energy storage under these conditions is mainly in reducing the maximum transient voltage dip, which is a measure of the dynamic performance of the system Based on Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC) criteria as shown in Figure 11, the voltage at any load bus should not dip below 20% of the initial value for more than 20 cycles. Estimating the total portion of induction motor loads is becoming a critical issue for power system stability. This was recognized in a study conducted for model validation and analysis of WSCC System Oscillations following Alberta Separation on August 4, 2000. Figure 12 shows the modeling result of the system oscillation following the separation for different percentages of induction motor loads. Based on this study, one of the recommendations was to increase the portion of induction motor load representation in selected areas for future system stability study models. Flywheels Page 26
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material Figure 11 Voltage Performance Parameters From WSCC Figure 12 Impact Of Induction Motors On System Oscillation Potential for Flywheel Energy Storage Mini FACTS in T&D Circuits Combining flywheel energy storage with appropriate bi-directional electronic power conversion provides a legitimate implementation of the distributed mini-FACTS controller. No such system has been built. Figure 13 shows a conceptual block diagram of a flywheel-based mini FACTS controller system. This system may be controlled to act as a stabilizer for distribution feeders, acting on post-disturbance voltage to assist in returning the voltage and frequency to an equilibrium status within one second. The advantages of the flywheel-based storage system over conventional lead-acid battery are relatively high-power density and cycle life as well as inherently lower maintenance and Flywheels Page 27
- Page 127 and 128: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 129 and 130: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 131 and 132: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 133 and 134: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 135 and 136: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 137 and 138: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 139 and 140: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 141 and 142: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 143 and 144: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 145: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 149 and 150: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 151: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 154 and 155: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 156 and 157: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 158 and 159: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 160 and 161: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 162 and 163: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 164 and 165: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 166 and 167: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 168 and 169: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 170 and 171: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 172 and 173: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 174 and 175: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 176 and 177: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 180 and 181: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 182 and 183: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 184 and 185: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 186 and 187: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 188 and 189: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 190 and 191: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 193 and 194: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 195 and 196: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 197 and 198: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 199 and 200: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 201 and 202: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 203 and 204: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 205 and 206: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 207 and 208: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 209 and 210: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 211 and 212: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 213 and 214: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 215 and 216: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 217 and 218: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 219 and 220: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 221 and 222: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 223 and 224: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 225 and 226: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
- Page 227 and 228: EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material
EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />
Figure 10<br />
Damping Of Post Fault Oscillation With And Without <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>St<strong>or</strong>age</strong><br />
The use <strong>of</strong> large-scale (100 MVAR <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e) FACTS controllers to provide dynamic<br />
reactive <strong>com</strong>pensation has already been demonstrated through several landmark projects.<br />
However, because <strong>of</strong> high initial cost, the alternative <strong>of</strong> a smaller scale, modularized,<br />
distributed real, and reactive VAR injection has recently received considerable attention.<br />
The key to this application is the injection <strong>of</strong> real energy st<strong>or</strong>age to maintain speed <strong>of</strong><br />
mot<strong>or</strong>, which in turn reduces the inrush current <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> feeders heavily loaded with mot<strong>or</strong><br />
loads. This minimizes bus voltage depression and thus helps with both rot<strong>or</strong> angle and<br />
voltage stability. By providing a critical boost to the system both during faults and<br />
following the clearing <strong>of</strong> faults helps avert instability. This type <strong>of</strong> distributed dynamic<br />
reactive <strong>com</strong>pensation with energy st<strong>or</strong>age is particularly suitable <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> solving transient<br />
voltage stability problems in a weak p<strong>or</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> the netw<strong>or</strong>k with a high concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
induction mot<strong>or</strong> loads during peak loading conditions.<br />
The advantage <strong>of</strong> energy st<strong>or</strong>age under these conditions is mainly in reducing the<br />
maximum transient voltage dip, which is a measure <strong>of</strong> the dynamic per<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
system Based on Western Systems Co<strong>or</strong>dinating Council (WSCC) criteria as shown in<br />
Figure 11, the voltage at any load bus should not dip below 20% <strong>of</strong> the initial value <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />
m<strong>or</strong>e than 20 cycles.<br />
Estimating the total p<strong>or</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> induction mot<strong>or</strong> loads is be<strong>com</strong>ing a critical issue <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />
power system stability. This was recognized in a study conducted <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> model validation<br />
and analysis <strong>of</strong> WSCC System Oscillations following Alberta Separation on August 4,<br />
2000. Figure 12 shows the modeling result <strong>of</strong> the system oscillation following the<br />
separation <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> different percentages <strong>of</strong> induction mot<strong>or</strong> loads. Based on this study, one <strong>of</strong><br />
the re<strong>com</strong>mendations was to increase the p<strong>or</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> induction mot<strong>or</strong> load representation<br />
in selected areas <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> future system stability study models.<br />
Flywheels Page 26