28.01.2015 Views

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

The technical criteria <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> grid stabilization, identified here as a “mini-facts” application,<br />

will be somewhat site and utility system specific but likely will fall within these<br />

parameters:<br />

• Application – Reactive power supply and frequency regulation supp<strong>or</strong>t <strong>of</strong> T&D<br />

• Power Rating – 2 to 40 MVA (power may be real, reactive, <strong>or</strong> both)<br />

• <strong>Energy</strong> Capacity – .5 to 10 kWh at MVA rating<br />

• Duration – C<strong>or</strong>rective action <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> cycles up to a few seconds<br />

• Response Time – 5 to 100 Milliseconds<br />

• Duty Cycle – Variable depending on conditions, may be a continuous problem<br />

• Roundtrip Efficiency – 80 to 90% (assumes less than 10% duty cycle)<br />

• Standby Losses – 3 to 4%<br />

• Plant Footprint – .05 MW/m 2 (assumes siting in low density area)<br />

• Environmental Issues – EMI<br />

Other, non energy st<strong>or</strong>age alternatives <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> solving this problem are: overexcited<br />

synchronous mot<strong>or</strong>s and generat<strong>or</strong>s, switched capacit<strong>or</strong>s, as well as fast acting static var<br />

<strong>com</strong>pensat<strong>or</strong>s (SVCs). Also, utilities traditional options to improve voltage regulation<br />

and control frequency are upgrading trans<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mer and feeder capacity, and cycling power<br />

plants.<br />

St<strong>or</strong>ed <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> “Distributed-Mini FACTS” Controllers<br />

The energy st<strong>or</strong>age application <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> improved stability is based on benefits <strong>of</strong> active power<br />

injection coupled with dynamic reactive power exchange with thee power system. The<br />

need <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> dynamic reactive power <strong>com</strong>pensation (“fast VARS”) as opposed to fixed <strong>or</strong><br />

mechanically switched capacit<strong>or</strong> banks have long been recognized as a way to improve<br />

T&D system stability and increase power transfer limits. This concept has been applied<br />

in large-scale inverter-based Flexible AC <strong>Transmission</strong> Systems (FACTS). These<br />

systems have the ability to affect changes <strong>of</strong> 10 to 100 MVAR and respond in less than<br />

one-quarter <strong>of</strong> a cycle and they have brought about a new way <strong>of</strong> thinking regarding<br />

active and reactive power.<br />

An example is the STATCOM, which outpaces switched passive capacit<strong>or</strong>s, react<strong>or</strong>s, and<br />

LTC trans<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mers in the rapid voltage regulation. STATCOM responds even faster than<br />

conventional generat<strong>or</strong>s, SVCs, <strong>or</strong> synchronous condensers, which in the past were the<br />

main supplier <strong>of</strong> “fast VAR” to the electric systems. Also, this type <strong>of</strong> dynamic reactive<br />

<strong>com</strong>pensation is better at supp<strong>or</strong>ting voltage during system contingencies than<br />

conventional capacit<strong>or</strong> banks that loose capacity when system voltage decreases, (See<br />

Figure 9).<br />

Flywheels Page 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!