Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

28.01.2015 Views

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material 1. Description 1.1. Introduction The Vanadium Redox Battery (VRB) is a flowing-electrolyte battery (or “flow battery”) that lends itself to high capacity, high cycle count requirements necessary for utility-scale T&D electricity storage applications. As its name implies, the VRB is based upon chemical reactions employing the mineral vanadium, a commercially produced metal. Unlike conventional batteries, the VRB stores its chemical energy in external electrolyte tanks that are sized according to the needs of the user. As necessary, aqueous liquid electrolyte is pumped from storage tanks into a set of reaction stacks where chemical energy is converted to electrical energy (discharge) or electrical energy is converted to chemical energy (charge). The electrolyte reactants can be thought of as a “fuel”, so the VRB is sometimes referred to as a fuel cell or a reversible fuel cell (as are other flow batteries). Figure 1 shows the stacks and tanks of a 250 kW / 520 kWh installation in Cape Town, South Africa. Figure 1 Typical VRB stacks and tanks (Courtesy Vantech) The VRB promises the following advantages over other storage technologies: • Power/Energy Design Flexibility. Since electrolyte is stored separately from the reaction stacks, the energy storage rating (kWh) is independent of the power rating (kW). This allows for design optimization for power and energy separately, specific to each application. • Long Service Life. Many of the failure modes associated with other batteries are avoided in the simple, elegant VRB electrochemistry. There are no Vanadium Redox Battery 6

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material electrodeposited solids of the active substance, and the reactions do not require elevated temperatures. • Layout Flexibility. The tanks can be easily arranged to fit the available space and shape of the facility. In one VRB demonstration, the tanks were made of rubber that conformed to the shape of basement walls in an office complex. • Low Standby Losses. Depending upon the application, it is possible to drain the stacks and store the charged electrolyte for long periods of time without self-discharge or pump auxiliary loads. • Simple Cell Management. Conventional batteries must be periodically charged at high voltages to equalize all cells to the same state of charge. This can produce undesirable levels of explosive hydrogen gas (a safety issue) and reduces the available water in the battery (a life issue). In the VRB, however, all cells share the same electrolyte at the same state of charge, so equalization is unnecessary. There are also some relative disadvantages of the VRB, including: • Mechanical Complexity. The advantages of storing electrolyte in tanks external to the stacks are offset by the complexity of hydraulic design. The VRB (as do other flow batteries) requires anolyte and catholyte pumps and associated plumbing to transport and distribute electrolyte to and from the stacks and within stacks to individual cells. Designs must address potential leaking throughout the system, and provide sufficient secondary containment in the event of leaks and spills. • Parasitic Losses. Electrolyte pumps draw power while the system is operating, reducing overall system efficiency. • Footprint. Relative to other battery technologies under consideration for T&D applications, the VRB requires 2 to 3 times the area per unit energy stored. This may limit applicability in locations where space is important. The VRB is an emerging energy storage technology that is entering the commercialization phase of development. The basic electrochemistry research is essentially complete, and the leading manufacturers have demonstrated full-scale gridconnected systems in Japan, South Africa, and North America. However, true commercial, standardized, volume-produced products are not yet available in the marketplace. 1.2. History of Development Early work on various redox batteries was undertaken by NASA in the 1970s and later by the Electro-Technical Laboratory (ETL) in Japan. In 1984, this foundation was applied to the VRB at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, Australia. Their work focused on the vanadium / vanadium redox couple, electrolyte stability at high concentrations, and production of electrolyte from raw materials. Several proof-ofconcept systems were built by UNSW and others including a battery to store electricity produced by solar photovoltaic panels (Thai Gypsum Products, Thailand), an emergency Vanadium Redox Battery 7

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

electrodeposited solids <strong>of</strong> the active substance, and the reactions do not<br />

require elevated temperatures.<br />

• Layout Flexibility. The tanks can be easily arranged to fit the available space<br />

and shape <strong>of</strong> the facility. In one VRB demonstration, the tanks were made <strong>of</strong><br />

rubber that con<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>med to the shape <strong>of</strong> basement walls in an <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>com</strong>plex.<br />

• Low Standby Losses. Depending upon the application, it is possible to drain<br />

the stacks and st<strong>or</strong>e the charged electrolyte <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> long periods <strong>of</strong> time without<br />

self-discharge <strong>or</strong> pump auxiliary loads.<br />

• Simple Cell Management. Conventional batteries must be periodically<br />

charged at high voltages to equalize all cells to the same state <strong>of</strong> charge. This<br />

can produce undesirable levels <strong>of</strong> explosive hydrogen gas (a safety issue) and<br />

reduces the available water in the battery (a life issue). In the VRB, however,<br />

all cells share the same electrolyte at the same state <strong>of</strong> charge, so equalization<br />

is unnecessary.<br />

There are also some relative disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the VRB, including:<br />

• Mechanical Complexity. The advantages <strong>of</strong> st<strong>or</strong>ing electrolyte in tanks<br />

external to the stacks are <strong>of</strong>fset by the <strong>com</strong>plexity <strong>of</strong> hydraulic design. The<br />

VRB (as do other flow batteries) requires anolyte and catholyte pumps and<br />

associated plumbing to transp<strong>or</strong>t and distribute electrolyte to and from the<br />

stacks and within stacks to individual cells. Designs must address potential<br />

leaking throughout the system, and provide sufficient secondary containment<br />

in the event <strong>of</strong> leaks and spills.<br />

• Parasitic Losses. Electrolyte pumps draw power while the system is<br />

operating, reducing overall system efficiency.<br />

• Footprint. Relative to other battery technologies under consideration <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

T&D applications, the VRB requires 2 to 3 times the area per unit energy<br />

st<strong>or</strong>ed. This may limit applicability in locations where space is imp<strong>or</strong>tant.<br />

The VRB is an emerging energy st<strong>or</strong>age technology that is entering the<br />

<strong>com</strong>mercialization phase <strong>of</strong> development. The basic electrochemistry research is<br />

essentially <strong>com</strong>plete, and the leading manufacturers have demonstrated full-scale gridconnected<br />

systems in Japan, South Africa, and N<strong>or</strong>th America. However, true<br />

<strong>com</strong>mercial, standardized, volume-produced products are not yet available in the<br />

marketplace.<br />

1.2. Hist<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong> Development<br />

Early w<strong>or</strong>k on various redox batteries was undertaken by NASA in the 1970s and later by<br />

the Electro-Technical Lab<strong>or</strong>at<strong>or</strong>y (ETL) in Japan. In 1984, this foundation was applied<br />

to the VRB at the University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, Australia. Their<br />

w<strong>or</strong>k focused on the vanadium / vanadium redox couple, electrolyte stability at high<br />

concentrations, and production <strong>of</strong> electrolyte from raw materials. Several pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>concept<br />

systems were built by UNSW and others including a battery to st<strong>or</strong>e electricity<br />

produced by solar photovoltaic panels (Thai Gypsum Products, Thailand), an emergency<br />

Vanadium Redox Battery 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!