28.01.2015 Views

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

Developmental costs<br />

The <strong>or</strong>iginal development <strong>of</strong> SMES systems was <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> load levelling as an alternative to pumped<br />

hydroelectric st<strong>or</strong>age. Thus, large energy st<strong>or</strong>age systems were considered initially. Research<br />

and then significant development were carried out over a quarter century in the US, beginning in<br />

the early 1970s. This ef<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>t was mainly supp<strong>or</strong>ted by the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense, the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>, and EPRI. Internationally, Japan had a significant program <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> about 20<br />

years, and several European countries participated at a modest level. The Defense Department -<br />

spons<strong>or</strong>ed Engineering Test Model program funded $72 M w<strong>or</strong>th <strong>of</strong> design, engineering and test<br />

w<strong>or</strong>k between 1988 and 1994. In addition, we estimate the total international R&D related lab<strong>or</strong><br />

on SMES <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> load levelling up to the present to be about 500 person years. Using a fully loaded<br />

annual charge <strong>of</strong> $150,000 (in 2002 funds) per person per year, this <strong>com</strong>es to $75M. Since no<br />

practical devices have been constructed <strong>or</strong> installed, material and construction costs will not<br />

increase this value significantly.<br />

At several points during the SMES development process, researchers recognized that the rapid<br />

discharge potential <strong>of</strong> SMES, together with the relatively high energy related (coil) costs <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> bulk<br />

st<strong>or</strong>age, made smaller systems m<strong>or</strong>e attractive and that significantly reducing the st<strong>or</strong>age time<br />

would increase the economic viability <strong>of</strong> the technology. Thus, there has also been considerable<br />

development on SMES <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> pulsed power systems. Though EPRI and government <strong>or</strong>ganizations<br />

have supp<strong>or</strong>ted some <strong>of</strong> this ef<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>t, a great deal has been internally supp<strong>or</strong>ted by industry. The<br />

total lab<strong>or</strong> R&D in this area has been about 250 person years. In addition, several devices have<br />

been fabricated. We estimate that the <strong>com</strong>bined international ef<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>t is on the <strong>or</strong>der <strong>of</strong> $50M <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

SMES systems <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> pulsed power, system stability, and <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> other rapid discharge applications.<br />

SMES Page 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!