Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

28.01.2015 Views

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material Advanced Power Systems (CAPS), a part of NHMFL and Florida State University. The coil will be initially operated with a 5 MW converter, which is appropriate for the local power system. It is designed, however, to accommodate power flows of up to 100 MW. Table II Existing Installations of Micro-SMES Commissioned Customer Location Description of Load May 1992 Central Fishkill, NY Semiconductor Testing Facility Hudson G&E December 1993 Tyndall AFB Panama City, FL Five General Military Buildings March 1993 CYANCO Winnemuca, NV 400 HP/4160V Motor at Chemical Plant May 1995 Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY Light Source Research Center Ultraviolet Light source, ring, and experiment station May 1995 McClellan AFB July 1996 U.S. Air Force June 1997 U.S. Air Force April 1997 SAPPI - Stanger Sacramento, CA Semiconductor Chip Mfg. Lab Fiber Optic Mfg. Facility Removed when Base Closed Tinker AFB, OK DC Link Support for two 800 kW/1000kVA Ups Tinker AFB, OK DC Link Support for two 800 kW/1000kVA Ups Stanger, South Africa 1000 kVA Paper Machine May 1997 AmeriMark Plastics Fairbluff, NC Plastic Extrusion Plant Removed when plant sold May 1999 STEWEAG Gleisdorf, Automotive Parts Foundry Austria June 2002 Edison/STM Agrate, Italy Semiconductor Processing Facility Voltage Sags - 2 Units April 2002 EDF Paris, France Voltage Sag Protection SMES Status Summary Tables Table III describes the status of three different aspects of SMES development. SMES Page 11

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material Table III Technology Status of SMES Application MicroSMES for Power Quality D-SMES for System Stability SMES for Load Leveling Status Commercial: several units Demonstration Theoretical installed as described in Table 1 Funding organizations Private funding in US. Some government funding of potential American Superconductor, Wisconsin Power System None at present; previously: EPRI, US DOE, US DNA applications by Japan and Germany Vendors American Superconductor American Superconductor None at present Major demonstrations See Table II Northern Wisconsin power system None Lessons learned Critical issues in terms of the power output and response time. Major development trends Unresolved issues American Superconductor has several units in the field at this time. However, they have standardized on the D-SMES installation as the standard product. At present there is only one developer. Costs of SMES units relative to other PQ technologies. Early data indicates that D-SMES is effective in the Wisconsin application. Additional information is required on these and other installations. American Superconductor is prepared to deliver additional units and is actively searching for customers Cost effectiveness of this application compared to other solutions. Long-term development and societal commitment is required for large systems that cost over a billion dollars and take more than ten years to complete. None Costs, and costs compared to other load leveling technologies SMES Page 12

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

Table III<br />

Technology Status <strong>of</strong> SMES<br />

Application MicroSMES <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Power Quality D-SMES <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> System Stability SMES <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Load Leveling<br />

Status<br />

Commercial: several units Demonstration<br />

The<strong>or</strong>etical<br />

installed as described in Table 1<br />

Funding <strong>or</strong>ganizations Private funding in US. Some<br />

government funding <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

American Superconduct<strong>or</strong>,<br />

Wisconsin Power System<br />

None at present; previously: EPRI,<br />

US DOE, US DNA<br />

applications by Japan and<br />

Germany<br />

Vend<strong>or</strong>s American Superconduct<strong>or</strong> American Superconduct<strong>or</strong> None at present<br />

Maj<strong>or</strong> demonstrations See Table II N<strong>or</strong>thern Wisconsin power system None<br />

Lessons learned Critical issues in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

power output and response time.<br />

Maj<strong>or</strong> development<br />

trends<br />

Unresolved issues<br />

American Superconduct<strong>or</strong> has<br />

several units in the field at this<br />

time. However, they have<br />

standardized on the D-SMES<br />

installation as the standard<br />

product. At present there is only<br />

one developer.<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> SMES units relative to<br />

other PQ technologies.<br />

Early data indicates that D-SMES<br />

is effective in the Wisconsin<br />

application. Additional<br />

in<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation is required on these<br />

and other installations.<br />

American Superconduct<strong>or</strong> is<br />

prepared to deliver additional units<br />

and is actively searching <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

customers<br />

Cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this<br />

application <strong>com</strong>pared to other<br />

solutions.<br />

Long-term development and<br />

societal <strong>com</strong>mitment is required<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> large systems that cost over a<br />

billion dollars and take m<strong>or</strong>e than<br />

ten years to <strong>com</strong>plete.<br />

None<br />

Costs, and costs <strong>com</strong>pared to other<br />

load leveling technologies<br />

SMES Page 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!