28.01.2015 Views

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission or ... - W2agz.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EPRI Proprietary Licensed Material<br />

cost/benefit analysis<br />

the modules be replaced at 10-year intervals. Costs and benefits <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> these options are<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

Table 4-5. Cost/Benefit <strong>of</strong> Power Quality Applications<br />

Base Case<br />

Alternate<br />

Power Quality PQ & LL<br />

Initial Installed Cost, M$ 6.0 6.5<br />

Total Cost, M$ (Note 1) 9.9 12.2<br />

Total Benefits, M$ (Note 2) 10.0 15.2<br />

NPV, M$ (Note 3) 0.1 3.0<br />

Notes:<br />

(1) Total Costs: Present value <strong>of</strong> initial capital, operating, replacement,<br />

taxes and insurance costs<br />

(2) Total Benefits: Present value <strong>of</strong> avoided costs and revenues<br />

(3) NPV: Total Benefits minus Total Costs<br />

4.2.3 Application 3: 26 MW Automatic Generation Control (200 NAS PQ<br />

Modules)<br />

The base-case AGC application assumes that this service is valued at $20/MWh, based on typical<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> the New Y<strong>or</strong>k Independent System Operat<strong>or</strong> (NYISO). The NAS system is equipped<br />

with grid interactive PCS architecture equivalent to DSTATCOM systems and with NAS energy<br />

st<strong>or</strong>age that can deliver 2.6 times rated power (130 kW per module) <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> up to one hour. Based<br />

on providing AGC <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> 16 hours per day, 350 days per year, the NPV <strong>of</strong> this system is negative<br />

($0.8M).<br />

However, if a NAS system also <strong>com</strong>prised <strong>of</strong> 200 NAS PQ modules is configured <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> functional<br />

equivalence with the NiCad-based GVEA BESS (see footnote, page 3-6), the NAS system<br />

appears to be a cost effective alternative, especially when energy density (space cost) is<br />

considered. 6<br />

F<strong>or</strong> this configuration, a NAS system can deliver 40MW at 4 times rated power<br />

(200 kW per module) <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> up to 15 minutes. The cost <strong>of</strong> the GVEA BESS is estimated to be<br />

$1220/kW based on initial cost in a temperature controlled space plus capitalized values <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

operating, maintenance, taxes and insurance costs. This <strong>com</strong>parison yields a NPV <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the NAS<br />

system <strong>of</strong> $4.9M. Costs and benefits <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> these options are summarized as follows:<br />

6<br />

This <strong>com</strong>parison assumes that NiCad systems are housed in a temperature controlled building, while NAS is in an<br />

exteri<strong>or</strong> enclosure, which would be the case in most <strong>of</strong> the U.S. In Alaska, NAS would also require interi<strong>or</strong> space<br />

and the NPV would decrease to about $4.1M.<br />

4-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!