28.01.2015 Views

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Freight Plan for the NYMTC Region<br />

3. Double-stack, Weight, and Lateral Clearance Improvements on Major East-of-Hudson Freight<br />

Lines – The Cross Harbor EIS has considered line improvements to provide a minimum<br />

of 22-foot six-inch vertical clearance between the tunnel portal at 65 th Street and<br />

Maspeth Yard, and 286,000 pound per axle weight compliance for the tracks. The<br />

cross-harbor tunnel system also would provide a wide load route clear of third rail<br />

and passenger platform obstructions.<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Impacts<br />

The Cross Harbor Tunnel DEIS includes an extensive analysis of future <strong>freight</strong> movement<br />

demand in the NYMTC region and an analysis of potential expansion of rail <strong>freight</strong> use<br />

resulting from construction of a direct rail <strong>freight</strong> connection across the harbor. According<br />

to the DEIS, a single Cross Harbor tunnel would divert 9.4 million tons of <strong>freight</strong> from<br />

truck to rail in the forecast year of 2025, while a double tunnel would divert 14.9 million<br />

tons. In addition to the traffic diverted from trucks, it is estimated that logistical and<br />

competitive considerations would lead four million tons of rail traffic that would otherwise<br />

be routed via Metro-North’s Hudson Line to be rerouted through the tunnel. 3<br />

According to the Cross Harbor DEIS, this diversion would improve <strong>freight</strong> movement in<br />

the Northern and Southern Crossing corridors but have more limited impacts in other corridors.<br />

The DEIS forecasts that this diversion would reduce the future (2025) volume of<br />

large trucks using the Hudson River crossings by 500,000 to 1,000,000 annual one-way<br />

<strong>freight</strong> truck trips (single versus double tunnel) compared to the future No Build. This is<br />

because shipments diverted from truck by enhanced rail service could cross the Hudson<br />

River by rail, and would not appear as truck trips on the river crossings. On the George<br />

Washington Bridge, the reduction in annual one-way <strong>freight</strong> truck trips would be 141,000<br />

to 333,000 (single versus double tunnel); and on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, 259,000 to<br />

333,000. Annual truck vehicle miles of travel in the region would be reduced by 41 to 62<br />

million miles out of a future total of 1.4 billion miles.<br />

To put these numbers in perspective, in 2025, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are forecast to represent<br />

almost seven percent of all truck trips in the region. However, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are generally<br />

the largest tractor-trailers which have the greatest impact on congestion, safety, roadway<br />

wear and tear, and emissions. Many of the other trucks are small pick-ups, vans, and<br />

utility vehicles.<br />

The single tunnel system will reduce the combined volume of <strong>freight</strong> trucks on the George<br />

Washington and Verrazano Narrows bridges by 400,000 one-way trips, plus another<br />

100,000 on the Tappan Zee Bridge and other Hudson River crossings. In 2025, the GWB<br />

and VNB are forecast to have a combined <strong>freight</strong> truck volume of about 4.7 million trips.<br />

3<br />

With the tunnel, CSX and CP would find that for much western traffic more frequent direct<br />

service through the new tunnel from Chicago would be superior to less frequent connecting<br />

service from Chicago on the Hudson Line with a classification in Albany. With the tunnel, NS<br />

would be able to compete with CSX for traffic to Long Island and NYC routed through Chicago<br />

that would otherwise be captive to CSX’s Hudson Line routing to <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City.<br />

Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 5-35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!