REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>REP11</strong>/<strong>PR</strong> 9<br />
Conclusion<br />
86. The Committee agreed that it would be useful if JM<strong>PR</strong> could elaborate MRLs proposals with and without making use of the<br />
concept of proportionality so that the result could be compared and that this exercise could be done as part of the general<br />
consideration issues of the 2011 JM<strong>PR</strong> for discussion by the next session of the Committee.<br />
DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: TREE NUTS, HERBS AND SPICES (Agenda<br />
Item 7a) 10<br />
87. The Committee recalled that the Draft Revision had been adopted by the Commission at Step 5, circulated for comments at<br />
Step 6 and revised by an electronic working group led by the Netherlands and the United States of America. The Delegation of the<br />
Netherlands highlighted the commodities which had been added to the lists as a result of the proposals made at the last session and<br />
in the working group. On the basis of these proposals, the Committee made the following amendments and comments to the<br />
Classification.<br />
Tree Nuts<br />
88. Under Pine Nuts, following the addition of “other Pinus species”, the Committee agreed to exclude Pinus armandii and Pinus<br />
massoniana as the nuts have a bitter taste and are not fit for consumption.<br />
Herbs<br />
89. The Committee confirmed the inclusion of Wild betel leaf bush, proposed at the last session. The following additions were<br />
also made in square brackets for further consideration: Calendula leaves [and flowers]; Geranium (lemon rose); and Pepper, leaves<br />
which might also be included under leafy vegetables. It was agreed to insert a new sub-group “Edible Flowers” in square brackets for<br />
further comments and consideration at the next session. Some editorial amendments and corrections were also made to the section.<br />
Spices<br />
90. Under “Root or Rhizome”, the Committee confirmed the inclusion of Lovage, roots proposed at the last session. Under “Citrus<br />
Peel”, it was agreed to replace Yuzu peel with Yuja peel as the main common name for Citrus junos.<br />
STATUS OF THE DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: TREE NUTS, HERBS AND SPICES<br />
91. The Committee agreed to hold the three commodity groups: tree nuts, herbs and spices at Step 7 pending finalization of the<br />
revision of the Classification (Appendix VI).<br />
92. The Committee agreed to return the new entry for “Edible Flowers” to Step 6 for comments and consideration at the next<br />
session (Appendix VII).<br />
<strong>PR</strong>OPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: ASSORTED TROPICAL AND<br />
SUB-TROPICAL FRUITS - EDIBLE PEEL AND ASSORTED TROPICAL AND SUB-TROPICAL FRUITS - INEDIBLE PEEL<br />
(Agenda Item 7b) 11<br />
93. The Committee recalled that its last session had established an electronic working group led by the Netherlands and the<br />
United States of America to prepare new proposals for the revision of the Classification. The Delegation of the Netherlands<br />
introduced the new drafts for Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits- edible peel and Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruitsinedible<br />
peel, and highlighted the main amendments. The title of the group had been amended to “ Miscellaneous Fruits” instead of<br />
“Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits” and the category “Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits - edible peel” had been divided into<br />
three sub-groups: small, large and palms.<br />
94. The Committee agreed with the proposal from several delegations to retain the title “Assorted tropical and sub-tropical fruits”<br />
as it was more representative of the commodities concerned, the term “miscellaneous” would allow the inclusion of other fruits that<br />
were not tropical, and this would affect the selection of representative commodities.<br />
10 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/5; CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/5-Add.1 (comments from Canada, Cuba and Thailand). Additional comments from Kenya (CRD 5); EU (CRD 14); Nigeria (CRD<br />
20); and Republic of Korea (CRD 25).<br />
11 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/6, CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/6-Add.1 (comments from Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Japan and Thailand). Additional comments from Panama (CRD 3);<br />
Republic of Korea (CRD 4); Kenya (CRD 5); EU (CRD 14); China (CRD 19); Nigeria (CRD 20); and Mali (CRD 21).