27.01.2015 Views

REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>REP11</strong>/<strong>PR</strong> 9<br />

Conclusion<br />

86. The Committee agreed that it would be useful if JM<strong>PR</strong> could elaborate MRLs proposals with and without making use of the<br />

concept of proportionality so that the result could be compared and that this exercise could be done as part of the general<br />

consideration issues of the 2011 JM<strong>PR</strong> for discussion by the next session of the Committee.<br />

DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: TREE NUTS, HERBS AND SPICES (Agenda<br />

Item 7a) 10<br />

87. The Committee recalled that the Draft Revision had been adopted by the Commission at Step 5, circulated for comments at<br />

Step 6 and revised by an electronic working group led by the Netherlands and the United States of America. The Delegation of the<br />

Netherlands highlighted the commodities which had been added to the lists as a result of the proposals made at the last session and<br />

in the working group. On the basis of these proposals, the Committee made the following amendments and comments to the<br />

Classification.<br />

Tree Nuts<br />

88. Under Pine Nuts, following the addition of “other Pinus species”, the Committee agreed to exclude Pinus armandii and Pinus<br />

massoniana as the nuts have a bitter taste and are not fit for consumption.<br />

Herbs<br />

89. The Committee confirmed the inclusion of Wild betel leaf bush, proposed at the last session. The following additions were<br />

also made in square brackets for further consideration: Calendula leaves [and flowers]; Geranium (lemon rose); and Pepper, leaves<br />

which might also be included under leafy vegetables. It was agreed to insert a new sub-group “Edible Flowers” in square brackets for<br />

further comments and consideration at the next session. Some editorial amendments and corrections were also made to the section.<br />

Spices<br />

90. Under “Root or Rhizome”, the Committee confirmed the inclusion of Lovage, roots proposed at the last session. Under “Citrus<br />

Peel”, it was agreed to replace Yuzu peel with Yuja peel as the main common name for Citrus junos.<br />

STATUS OF THE DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: TREE NUTS, HERBS AND SPICES<br />

91. The Committee agreed to hold the three commodity groups: tree nuts, herbs and spices at Step 7 pending finalization of the<br />

revision of the Classification (Appendix VI).<br />

92. The Committee agreed to return the new entry for “Edible Flowers” to Step 6 for comments and consideration at the next<br />

session (Appendix VII).<br />

<strong>PR</strong>OPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF <strong>FOOD</strong>S AND ANIMAL FEEDS: ASSORTED TROPICAL AND<br />

SUB-TROPICAL FRUITS - EDIBLE PEEL AND ASSORTED TROPICAL AND SUB-TROPICAL FRUITS - INEDIBLE PEEL<br />

(Agenda Item 7b) 11<br />

93. The Committee recalled that its last session had established an electronic working group led by the Netherlands and the<br />

United States of America to prepare new proposals for the revision of the Classification. The Delegation of the Netherlands<br />

introduced the new drafts for Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits- edible peel and Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruitsinedible<br />

peel, and highlighted the main amendments. The title of the group had been amended to “ Miscellaneous Fruits” instead of<br />

“Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits” and the category “Assorted Tropical and Sub-Tropical Fruits - edible peel” had been divided into<br />

three sub-groups: small, large and palms.<br />

94. The Committee agreed with the proposal from several delegations to retain the title “Assorted tropical and sub-tropical fruits”<br />

as it was more representative of the commodities concerned, the term “miscellaneous” would allow the inclusion of other fruits that<br />

were not tropical, and this would affect the selection of representative commodities.<br />

10 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/5; CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/5-Add.1 (comments from Canada, Cuba and Thailand). Additional comments from Kenya (CRD 5); EU (CRD 14); Nigeria (CRD<br />

20); and Republic of Korea (CRD 25).<br />

11 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/6, CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/6-Add.1 (comments from Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Japan and Thailand). Additional comments from Panama (CRD 3);<br />

Republic of Korea (CRD 4); Kenya (CRD 5); EU (CRD 14); China (CRD 19); Nigeria (CRD 20); and Mali (CRD 21).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!