REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REP11/PR 7 DIFENOCONAZOLE (224) 66. The Committee decided to advance the proposed draft MRL for papaya to Step 5 awaiting authorized GAP to be submitted by Kenya. 67. The Committee also decided to advance all other proposed draft MRLs to Step 5/8 for adoption, including those MRLs for common bean and peas (with pod) that were recommended by 2010 JMPR but listed in the database as legume vegetables with the subsequent revocation of the existing CXLs for edible offal (mammalian); meat (from mammals other than marine mammals) and milks. CHLORANTRANILIPROLE (230) 68. The Committee decided to advance all proposed draft MRLs to Step 5/8 and the subsequent revocation of the associated CXLs for edible offal (mammalian); eggs; meat (from mammals other than marine mammals); milk fats; milks and poultry, edible offal of, noting the reservations of the Delegations of the EU and Norway regarding the extrapolation used by JMPR for brassica (cole or cabbage) vegetables, head Cabbage, flowerhead brassicas. 69. The Committee also decided to revoke the CXL for grapes as recommended by the 2010 JMPR to be replaced by a group CXL. FLUOPICOLIDE (235) 70. The Committee decided to advance all draft MRLs to Step 8 for adoption, noting that acute intake concern expressed by the Delegations of the EU and Switzerland in 2010 had been considered by JMPR and their conclusions were presented in chapter 3 of the 2010 JMPR report. CLOTHIANIDIN (238) 71. The Committee noted that clothianidin is also a metabolite of thiamethoxam (245) and that new data to support a reconsideration of the residue definition were available from the manufacturer for consideration by JMPR in 2011. 72. The Committee decided to advance the proposed draft MRL for banana; dried grapes; edible offal (mammalian); eggs; grapes; mammalian fats (except milk fats); meat (from mammals other than marine mammals); milks; pome fruits; poultry fats; poultry meat; rice; root and tuber vegetable; sorghum; sorghum straw and fodder dry; stalk and stem vegetables; sugar cane; and sweet corn (corn on the cob) to Step 5 because the source of the residue is clothianidin, for which the residue definition is being reconsidered. 73. The Committee decided to advance all other proposed draft MRLs to Step 5/8 noting the reservation of the Delegations of the EU and Norway regarding the extrapolation used by JMPR for berries and other small fruits; brassica (cole or cabbage) vegetables, head cabbage, flower-head brassicas; root and tuber vegetables and stone fruits. CYPROCONAZOLE (239) 74. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8. DICAMBA (240) 75. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8, noting that the manufacturer will be submitting revised labels to support the assessment of residue data for soya beans by the 2011 JMPR. ETOXAZOLE (241) 76. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8. The Delegation of the USA indicated that they would lodge a concern form over storage stability correction factors for assessed commodities for which no MRLs were recommended and the Committee noted that the manufacture will submit supporting information on storage stability for evaluation by the 2011 JMPR.
REP11/PR 8 FLUBENDIAMIDE (242) 77. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8 noting the reservations of the Delegations of the EU and Norway regarding the proposed draft MRLs for brassica (cole or cabbage) vegetables, head cabbage, flowerhead brassicas; fruiting vegetables, cucurbits; legume vegetables, stone fruits due to the extrapolations used by JMPR and for peppers; tomato and tea, green, black (black, fermented and dried) due to insufficient number of trials. FLUOPYRAM (243) 78. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8. MEPTYLDINOCAP (244) 79. The Committee decided to advance all proposed draft MRLs to Step 5/8 and agreed that the source of the residue be indicated for each proposed MRL. The Committee noted that the residue definition of meptyldinocap for MRL compliance was corrected to align it with the JMPR recommendation. THIAMETHOXAM (245) 80. The Committee decided to advance all the proposed draft MRLs for adoption at Step 5/8 in line with the recommendations for clothianidin (238) noting the reservations of the Delegations of the EU and Norway regarding the extrapolations used by JMPR for berries and other small fruits; brassica (cole or cabbage) vegetables, head cabbage, flowerhead brassicas; citrus fruits; fruiting vegetables other than cucurbits; fruiting vegetables, cucurbits; leafy vegetables; root and tuber vegetables and stone fruits. 81. The Committee noted that the Delegation of Brazil would submit data and GAP for papaya to JMPR to support a higher MRL. DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE APPLICATION OF PROPORTIONALITY IN SELECTING DATA FOR MRL ESTIMATION (Agenda Item 6) 8 82. The Committee recalled that at its last session it had noted the concerns expressed by a delegation that JMPR had not recommended MRLs for some commodities as application rates in supporting residue trials were more than 25% greater than the critical GAP (cGAP) application rates (the JMPR/OECD cut-off point). The Committee agreed that the Delegation of Australia would prepare a discussion paper to address the application of proportionality in selecting data for MRL estimation for consideration at its next session. 9 83. The Delegation of Australia made a presentation based on the information provided in CX/PR 11/43/4 including practical examples of application of proportionality based on types and rates of application, chemical/commodity combinations and associated MRLs. The Delegation drew the attention of the Committee to the recommendation in the working paper by which JMPR could apply proportionality in those cases where the residue data according to GAP were not sufficient for a recommendation. The Delegation noted that this approach would give greater flexibility to JMPR in the use of residue field trial data and would allow MRL estimates to be made in situations where the current ±25% rules excluded such estimates. 84. The Committee noted that there was general support for the application of proportionality by using supporting residue trials with application rates beyond ±25% in those cases where the residue data according to GAP were not sufficient for a recommendation. However, it was noted that this situation usually applied to minor crops and should therefore be limited to these crops as opposed to major crops where availability of data usually allowed for normal residue evaluations. It was also noted that, when applying proportionality, all data points under consideration, i.e. within/outside the acceptable range of ±25%, should be adjusted to 1X to prevent issues of bias. It was further noted that the concept of proportionality should be further tested to ensure reliable results before the Committee endorse this approach for use by JMPR. It would thus be helpful to gather information on what compound/crop combinations the proportionality principles could apply, statistical methods used, number of tests needed, criteria for application of the proportionality method, etc. 85. The FAO JMPR Secretariat informed the Committee that relevant information on the proportionality approach was provided by the 2010 JMPR (General Consideration 2.8 of the 2010 JMPR Report). In this regard, the 2010 JMPR had also recommended principles for use of proportionality, including general aspects, commodity and application types, etc. The 2010 JMPR Report also presented examples on how to use these principles and the statistical method. 8 CX/PR 11/43/4. Comments from the EU (CRD16). Section 2.8, 2010 JMPR Report. 9 ALINORM 10/33/24 paras 72-73.
Page 1 and 2: E REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STAND
Page 3 and 4: CL 2011/9-PR ii PART C: REQUEST FOR
Page 5 and 6: CL 2011/9-PR iv • agreed that Mem
Page 7 and 8: CL 2011/9-PR vi Fluopicolide (235)
Page 9 and 10: CL 2011/9-PR viii LIST OF ABBREVIAT
Page 11 and 12: REP11/PR 2 10. In reply to the requ
Page 13 and 14: REP11/PR 4 REPORT ON 2010 JMPR RESP
Page 15: REP11/PR 6 52. The Committee decide
Page 19 and 20: REP11/PR 10 Assorted tropical and s
Page 21 and 22: REP11/PR 12 STATUS OF THE DRAFT PRI
Page 23 and 24: REP11/PR 14 128. Some delegations p
Page 25 and 26: REP11/PR 16 148. The Committee note
Page 27 and 28: REP11/PR 18 SUMMARY STATUS OF WORK
Page 29 and 30: REP11/PR Appendix I 20 LIST OF PART
Page 31 and 32: REP11/PR Appendix I 22 Mrs Lidia GO
Page 33 and 34: REP11/PR Appendix I 24 Dr PAN Canpi
Page 35 and 36: REP11/PR Appendix I 26 ECUADOR/ÉQU
Page 37 and 38: REP11/PR Appendix I 28 Mr. ISTVAN B
Page 39 and 40: REP11/PR Appendix I 30 MALAYSIA/MAL
Page 41 and 42: REP11/PR Appendix I 32 REPUBLIC OF
Page 43 and 44: REP11/PR Appendix I 34 Mr Poh Leong
Page 45 and 46: REP11/PR Appendix I 36 UNITED STATE
Page 47 and 48: REP11/PR Appendix I 38 Mr Mika Chib
Page 49 and 50: REP11/PR Appendix I 40 INTER-AMERIC
Page 51 and 52: REP11/PR Appendix I 42 Mr ZHENG Zun
Page 53 and 54: REP11/PR Appendix II 44 DRAFT MAXIM
Page 55 and 56: REP11/PR Appendix III 46 Commodity
Page 63 and 64: REP11/PR Appendix IV 54 PROPOSED DR
Page 65 and 66: REP11/PR Appendix V 56 Commodity MR
Page 67 and 68:
REP11/PR Appendix V 58 Commodity MR
Page 69 and 70:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 60 TREE NUTS C
Page 71 and 72:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 62 TN 0669 Mac
Page 73 and 74:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 64 HH 0722 Bas
Page 75 and 76:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 66 HH 0738 Min
Page 77 and 78:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 68 HH 0752 Win
Page 79 and 80:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 70 HS 0722 Bas
Page 81 and 82:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 72 HS 3298 Pep
Page 83 and 84:
REP11/PR Appendix VI 74 HS 3340 Saf
Page 85 and 86:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 76 APPENDIX
Page 87 and 88:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 78 FT 0298 G
Page 89 and 90:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 80 FT 2334 W
Page 91 and 92:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 82 FT 2369 M
Page 93 and 94:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 84 Portion o
Page 95 and 96:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 86 FI 2484 E
Page 97 and 98:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 88 006C Asso
Page 99 and 100:
REP11/PR Appendix VIII 90 FI 0356 F
Page 101 and 102:
REP11/PR Appendix IX 92 Alternative
Page 103 and 104:
REP11/PR Appendix IX 94 Table 1 Sel
Page 105 and 106:
REP11/PR Appendix IX 96 Table 1. Se
Page 107 and 108:
REP11/PR Appendix IX 98 Table 1. Se
Page 109 and 110:
REP11/PR Appendix X 100 APPENDIX X
Page 111 and 112:
REP11/PR Appendix X 102 The relativ
Page 113 and 114:
REP11/PR Appendix X 104 u (C ref) (
Page 115 and 116:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 106 Table 1: S
Page 117 and 118:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 108 flupyram (
Page 119 and 120:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 110 imazapyr B
Page 121 and 122:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 112 chlorantra
Page 123 and 124:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 114 fenpropath
Page 125 and 126:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 116 2015 JMPR
Page 127 and 128:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 118 2017 JMPR
Page 129:
REP11/PR Appendix XI 120 Table 6: P
show all

REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?