REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
REP11/PR JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>REP11</strong>/<strong>PR</strong> 1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
1. The Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CC<strong>PR</strong>) held its 43 rd Session in Beijing, China, from 4 to 9 April 2011 at the kind<br />
invitation of the Government of the People’s Republic China. Professor Xiongwu Qiao, Vice-Director of the Shanxi Academy of<br />
Agricultural Sciences chaired the session, assisted by Dr Weili Shan, Director of Residue Division of Institute for Control of<br />
Agrochemicals, Ministry of Agriculture. The Session was attended by 189 delegates representing 58 Member Countries, 1 Member<br />
Organization and Observers from 7 international organizations. The list of participants is attached as Appendix I.<br />
OPENING OF THE SESSION<br />
2. The Session was opened by Mr Chen Xiaohua, Vice-Minister of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Mr Xiaohua<br />
extended his sincere appreciation to <strong>FAO</strong> and <strong>WHO</strong> for their support and assistance and welcomed all delegates. He indicated that<br />
China, as host country of Committee on Pesticide Residues, will continuously enhance cooperation with other countries and make its<br />
due contribution to advancing agricultural development in the world.<br />
Division of Competence 1<br />
3. The Committee noted the division of competence between the European Union (EU) and its Member States, according to<br />
paragraph 5, Rule II of the Procedure of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, as presented in CRD 2.<br />
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA (Agenda Item 1) 2<br />
4. The Committee agreed to consider Agenda Item 11 Revision of the Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee<br />
on Pesticide Residues after Agenda Item 5 Draft and Proposed Draft Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods and Feeds<br />
and adopted the Provisional Agenda as the Agenda for the Session.<br />
In-session working groups<br />
5. The Committee agreed to establish an in-session Working Group on Methods of Analysis, chaired by Australia to consider: 1)<br />
the revision of the Guidelines on the Estimation of Uncertainty of Results for the Determination of Pesticide Residues (Agenda Item<br />
10a); 2) the recommendations of the Discussion Paper on how to address Methods of Analysis for Pesticide Residues by the CC<strong>PR</strong><br />
(Agenda Item 10b); and 3) the opportunity to convene an expert consultation to provide scientific guidance on the development of<br />
performance characteristics for multi-residue analysis and proposed terms of reference for the consultation as requested from the<br />
Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (Agenda Item 3).<br />
6. The Committee also agreed to establish an in-session Working Group on Priorities, chaired by Australia, to consider the<br />
revision of the Priority List (Agenda Item 12a) as well as the recommendations on the status of Codex MRLs for Lindane (Agenda<br />
Item 12b).<br />
APPOINTMENT OF RAPPORTEURS (Agenda Item 2)<br />
7. The Committee appointed Mr David Lunn (New Zealand) and Mr Kevin Bodnaruk (Australia) to act as rapporteurs.<br />
MATTERS REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE BY THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION AND CODEX COMMITTEES<br />
(Agenda Item 3) 3<br />
8. The Committee noted matters for information and agreed that the revision of the Risk Analysis Principles applied by the<br />
Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues in relation to their consistency with the Working Principles for Risk Analysis and their<br />
applicability to animal feed should be considered in the framework of the ongoing revision of the Risk Analysis Principles (Agenda<br />
Item 11).<br />
9. As regards the revision of the definition of “hazard” in the Procedural Manual, the Committee noted that this proposal was<br />
related to nutrient risk assessment and that the 32 nd Session of the Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses<br />
(CCNFSDU) had already decided not to amend the definition. The Committee agreed that further discussion on this matter was no<br />
longer necessary.<br />
1 CRD 2 (EU Division of Competence).<br />
2 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/1.<br />
3 CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/2 and CX/<strong>PR</strong> 11/43/2-Add.1. Comments from Kenya (CRD 5) and Argentina (CRD 18). Report of the in-session Working Group on Methods of<br />
Analysis (CRD 30).