27.01.2015 Views

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

According to this court, the legal heir <strong>of</strong> the deceased insured <strong>has</strong> the right<br />

to <strong>claim</strong> insur<strong>an</strong>ce coverage as mentioned in the policy to the insur<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

co-petitioner <strong>an</strong> the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>y is also liable to be discharged its<br />

duties as per terms <strong>an</strong>d condition <strong>of</strong> the policy. As the same is not <strong>an</strong> issue<br />

before this Court, this Court is not expressing <strong>an</strong>y opinion regarding <strong>claim</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the Respondent <strong>claim</strong><strong>an</strong>t before the Petitioner Insur<strong>an</strong>ce Comp<strong>an</strong>y. As<br />

the learned Tribunal acted beyond its jurisdiction, there is no other<br />

alternative before this Court except to set aside the impugned Judgment dtd.<br />

08.04.201<strong>1.</strong>”<br />

16. However, in this connection, I have gone through the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the Honourable Apex Court reported in (2006) 8 SCC 553 (<br />

Dh<strong>an</strong>raj -vs- New India Assur<strong>an</strong>ce Co. Ltd. <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>r.) , wherein the Apex<br />

Court was dealing with a situation where the appell<strong>an</strong>t therein alongwith<br />

certain other persons was travelling in his own jeep met with <strong>an</strong> <strong>accident</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>d received injuries. The Claim Petitions were filed seeking compensation<br />

from the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>y. The Tribunal held that the driver <strong>of</strong> the jeep<br />

was responsible for the <strong>accident</strong> <strong>an</strong>d in all the Claim Petitions filed by the<br />

passengers the Tribunal directed the owner as well as the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

Comp<strong>an</strong>y to pay compensation. While dealing with the Claim Petition filed<br />

by the owner, the Tribunal directed the driver <strong>an</strong>d the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>y to<br />

pay compensation to the appell<strong>an</strong>t. The appeal filed by the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

comp<strong>an</strong>y was allowed by the Honourable High Court, <strong>an</strong>d aggrieved by the<br />

same, the Claim<strong>an</strong>t/ owner therein carried the matter to Honourable Apex<br />

Court. Analysing the provision <strong>of</strong> Section 147 <strong>of</strong> the Motor Vehicle Act, the<br />

Honourable Apex Court held in para-8 as under - “Thus, <strong>an</strong> Insur<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

policy covers the liability incurred by the insured in respect <strong>of</strong> death or<br />

bodily injury to <strong>an</strong>y person ( including the owner <strong>of</strong> the goods or his<br />

authorised representative ) carried in the vehicle or damage to <strong>an</strong>y property<br />

<strong>of</strong> a third party caused by or arising <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the vehicle. Section<br />

147 <strong>of</strong> the M.V.Act does not require <strong>an</strong> Insur<strong>an</strong>ce comp<strong>an</strong>y to assume risk<br />

for death or bodily injury <strong>of</strong> the owner <strong>of</strong> the vehicle”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!