27.01.2015 Views

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

1. This motor accident claim case has arisen out of an application ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

husb<strong>an</strong>d died on the spot. For the <strong>accident</strong>, Boginadi PS Case No.18/2008<br />

u/s 279/ 304(A) IPC was registered. Hence, the <strong>claim</strong>.<br />

3. OP No.1, the Br<strong>an</strong>ch M<strong>an</strong>ager/ Divisional M<strong>an</strong>ager <strong>of</strong><br />

Bajaj Alli<strong>an</strong>z General Insur<strong>an</strong>ce Comp<strong>an</strong>y Ltd. <strong>an</strong>d the OP No.2, the<br />

General M<strong>an</strong>ager <strong>of</strong> the said Comp<strong>an</strong>y being the insurer <strong>of</strong> the vehicle<br />

bearing registration No.AS.07.C/0119 (Winger) contested the <strong>case</strong> by filing<br />

joint written statement, wherein they denied the statements made in the<br />

Claim <strong>application</strong> relating to the m<strong>an</strong>ner in which the <strong>accident</strong> took place,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d also stated that the <strong>claim</strong> for the death <strong>of</strong> a owner / driver <strong>of</strong> a vehicle<br />

under P.A. coverage c<strong>an</strong> not be settled in the Motor Accident Claims<br />

Tribunal <strong>an</strong>d the nominee or legal heir <strong>of</strong> the deceased is to apply directly to<br />

the Insur<strong>an</strong>ce Comp<strong>an</strong>y in the proper format for settlement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>claim</strong>. It<br />

is also submitted that the <strong>claim</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>claim</strong><strong>an</strong>t is excessive <strong>an</strong>d baseless.<br />

Under the premises, the OPs pray for exempting them from the liability <strong>of</strong><br />

making payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>y amount as compensation.<br />

4. Upon the pleadings <strong>of</strong> the parties, the following issues<br />

were framed for just decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong> :<br />

1) Whether the <strong>accident</strong> took place due to rash <strong>an</strong>d negligent driving <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vehicle bearing registration No.AS.07.C/0119 (Winger) causing death to<br />

Pradip Baruah <br />

2) Whether the <strong>claim</strong><strong>an</strong>t is entitled to get <strong>an</strong>y compensation as prayed for <br />

3) What other relief / reliefs the parties are entitled to <br />

5. In order to subst<strong>an</strong>tiate the <strong>claim</strong>, Two witnesses<br />

including the Claim<strong>an</strong>t have submitted their evidence on affidavit <strong>an</strong>d they<br />

were cross examined on behalf <strong>of</strong> the OPs. No witness was adduced from<br />

the side <strong>of</strong> the Opposite Parties. The <strong>claim</strong><strong>an</strong>t also exhibited the Accident<br />

Information Report in Form 54 as Ext.1, the certified copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chaoldhowaghat Police Out Post GD Entry as Ext.2 <strong>an</strong>d the certified copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Post Mortem Report <strong>of</strong> the deceased as Ext.3.<br />

6. I have heard argument <strong>of</strong> the learned advocates for the<br />

<strong>claim</strong><strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d the Opposite Parties, Insur<strong>an</strong>ce Comp<strong>an</strong>y, <strong>an</strong>d also perused the<br />

evidence on record.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!