27.01.2015 Views

Academic calendar Academic calendar - Study in the UK

Academic calendar Academic calendar - Study in the UK

Academic calendar Academic calendar - Study in the UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dismissal From Redeemer<br />

University College<br />

Students who are dismissed from <strong>the</strong> university are normally given<br />

an opportunity to appeal <strong>the</strong>ir dismissal to ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Vice-President<br />

(<strong>Academic</strong>) for academic dismissals or <strong>the</strong> Dean of Students for<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>ary dismissals. Details with respect to <strong>the</strong> appeal procedure are<br />

outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> letter of dismissal.<br />

If a student is dismissed from <strong>the</strong> university for academic reasons, a<br />

statement at <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> transcript will reflect this dismissal.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> case of discipl<strong>in</strong>ary dismissal, a student will be assigned a<br />

“W” for each course <strong>in</strong> which he or she is enrolled. On <strong>the</strong> transcript,<br />

a statement at <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> term <strong>in</strong> question will reflect<br />

“Discipl<strong>in</strong>ary Dismissal” and <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> dismissal.<br />

Policy on <strong>Academic</strong> Integrity<br />

Redeemer University College affirms that all members of <strong>the</strong><br />

university community are obliged to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest standards<br />

of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity. All students, staff, faculty, and adm<strong>in</strong>istrators<br />

at Redeemer University College are responsible for creat<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g an environment where academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity flourishes <strong>in</strong><br />

all areas of academic life, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>struction, learn<strong>in</strong>g, research,<br />

and adm<strong>in</strong>istration. This is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of our mandate to perform<br />

scholarly work under <strong>the</strong> Lordship of Jesus Christ and to serve Him.<br />

The faculty, staff, and adm<strong>in</strong>istration of Redeemer University College<br />

are responsible for encourag<strong>in</strong>g students to be m<strong>in</strong>dful of <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction, learn<strong>in</strong>g, and research, and to set standards for<br />

academic work by which students must abide. It is <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />

of <strong>the</strong> faculty and adm<strong>in</strong>istration of Redeemer University College to<br />

ensure that expectations with respect to academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity are clearly<br />

communicated to students. Some departments and <strong>in</strong>structors may<br />

have specific rules designed to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity and <strong>the</strong>se<br />

are to be clearly communicated to students.<br />

The faculty, staff, and adm<strong>in</strong>istration of Redeemer University College<br />

believe that breaches of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity significantly underm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

university’s ability to fairly evaluate students and, as such, consider<br />

breaches of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity to be unacceptable and counter to <strong>the</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives of <strong>the</strong> university.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g list provides examples of breaches of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity:<br />

1. Cheat<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g a quiz, test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation. Cheat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g, or attempt<strong>in</strong>g to use, unauthorized materials dur<strong>in</strong>g a quiz,<br />

test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

2. The unauthorized alteration of work that has already been graded<br />

and <strong>the</strong> re-submission of that work <strong>in</strong> order to receive a better grade.<br />

3. Plagiarism. Plagiarism is <strong>the</strong> submission of material that has been,<br />

entirely or <strong>in</strong> part, copied from, stolen from, purchased from, written<br />

by, created by, designed by, or produced by ano<strong>the</strong>r person(s)<br />

without proper acknowledgement. When students directly quote<br />

or use material from a particular source, or when <strong>the</strong>y use material<br />

<strong>in</strong>directly (i.e. <strong>the</strong>y are express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own words a concept,<br />

idea, or <strong>in</strong>terpretation that <strong>the</strong>y have obta<strong>in</strong>ed from ano<strong>the</strong>r source),<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are required to provide a reference or footnote to give credit<br />

to <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al source of <strong>the</strong> material. Failure to do so constitutes<br />

plagiarism. The offense could stem from a deliberate attempt to<br />

deceive, which is particularly serious, or from careless scholarship,<br />

which is less serious, but still plagiarism.<br />

4. The submission of work for which previous credit has been<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed, unless <strong>the</strong> previously submitted work has been presented<br />

as such to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor of <strong>the</strong> second course and that <strong>in</strong>structor has<br />

deemed it as acceptable for credit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> course.<br />

5. Obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, distribut<strong>in</strong>g, and/or receiv<strong>in</strong>g copies of a quiz, test,<br />

or exam<strong>in</strong>ation before <strong>the</strong> quiz, test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation is to be<br />

written, without <strong>the</strong> consent of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor. Likewise, releas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> content of a quiz, test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>in</strong> case<br />

one is permitted to write it before <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> class, constitutes a<br />

breach of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity.<br />

6. Provid<strong>in</strong>g false <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> alternate quiz/test/<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation dates or an extension of deadl<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

7. Aid<strong>in</strong>g and abett<strong>in</strong>g ano<strong>the</strong>r student’s misconduct. A student who<br />

know<strong>in</strong>gly allows his or her quiz, test, exam<strong>in</strong>ation, assignment,<br />

computer program, artwork, etc. to be copied has committed a<br />

breach of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity. Likewise, a student who offers his or<br />

her services to write or rewrite academic material to be submitted<br />

under <strong>the</strong> name of ano<strong>the</strong>r student has committed a breach of<br />

academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity.<br />

8. Tamper<strong>in</strong>g with ano<strong>the</strong>r student’s work or deliberately prevent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r student from complet<strong>in</strong>g an assignment or study<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

a quiz, test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> an attempt to hurt that student’s<br />

academic stand<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

9. Impersonation of ano<strong>the</strong>r student at a quiz, test, or exam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

10.Forg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> signature of ano<strong>the</strong>r student on attendance sheets.<br />

11.Provid<strong>in</strong>g false <strong>in</strong>formation for <strong>the</strong> purpose of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g admission to<br />

Redeemer University College, ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g transfer credits, etc.<br />

12.Falsify<strong>in</strong>g, misrepresent<strong>in</strong>g, or forg<strong>in</strong>g an academic record, letter<br />

of reference, or any official university document.<br />

No matter what offense is committed, a note describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> offense will<br />

be placed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> student’s file by <strong>the</strong> Registrar.<br />

Process<br />

If <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor suspects that a breach of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity has<br />

occurred, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor will meet with <strong>the</strong> student to discuss <strong>the</strong><br />

charge. For cases that correspond to #7 through #12 above, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>structor will refer <strong>the</strong> matter to <strong>the</strong> Dean of Students. Penalties will<br />

be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Student Life Department, <strong>in</strong> consultation with <strong>the</strong><br />

Discipl<strong>in</strong>e Committee, us<strong>in</strong>g already established guidel<strong>in</strong>es (see <strong>the</strong><br />

Student Handbook).<br />

For cases that correspond to #1 through #6 above, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedure will be used:<br />

If <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor is conv<strong>in</strong>ced that a breach of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity has<br />

occurred, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor will refer <strong>the</strong> matter to <strong>the</strong> faculty adjudicator<br />

who has <strong>the</strong> responsibility of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r a breach of academic<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity has actually occurred. In mak<strong>in</strong>g this determ<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> faculty<br />

adjudicator may obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from any person <strong>in</strong>volved. If <strong>the</strong><br />

faculty adjudicator determ<strong>in</strong>es that a breach of academic <strong>in</strong>tegrity has<br />

occurred, he or she will notify <strong>the</strong> Chair of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Standards<br />

Committee <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>form him or her of <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> charge<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> student. The Chair of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Standards Committee<br />

will <strong>the</strong>n determ<strong>in</strong>e, follow<strong>in</strong>g consultation with <strong>the</strong> Registrar, whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!