Estimating the cost-effectiveness and affordability of future malaria ...

Estimating the cost-effectiveness and affordability of future malaria ... Estimating the cost-effectiveness and affordability of future malaria ...

malariavaccine.org
from malariavaccine.org More from this publisher
27.01.2015 Views

Estimating the cost-effectiveness and affordability of future malaria vaccines The project motivation National policymakers and other stakeholders have indicated the need for good-quality evidence on the economic efficiency and impact of malaria vaccines. This is why the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI) is collaborating with the Johns Hopkins University, the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and researchers in endemic African countries to generate data to address questions related to the cost-effectiveness and affordability of malaria vaccines. These data will help African countries make timely and informed decisions about malaria vaccine introduction and use, once a vaccine becomes available. The context The need to provide cost-effective interventions and to have information to interpret and use cost-effectiveness has been increasingly promoted through high-profile calls from national governments, international agencies, and multilateral initiatives, including the World Bank’s 1993 World Development Report and the 2002 World Health Report (World Health Organization, 2002). A lack of evidence on cost-effectiveness is thought to have contributed to the slow uptake of some interventions, such as Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B (HBV) vaccines. Countries routinely use cost-effectiveness evidence for making policy decisions. Low- and middleincome countries—such as Ghana and Mexico—have used cost-effectiveness data to prioritize investments among interventions as part of sector-wide decision-making. High-income countries routinely use economic evaluations to help prioritize health expenditures and to increase efficiency within the health sector. The potential Decision-making related to malaria vaccines may soon enter a complex phase, as countries consider the prospect of adopting RTS,S, a first-generation vaccine. If the required public health information, including safety and efficacy data from the Phase 3 program, is deemed satisfactory, the World Health Organization has indicated that a policy recommendation for the RTS,S malaria vaccine candidate is possible as early as 2015, paving the way for decisions by African nations regarding large-scale implementation of the vaccine through their national immunization programs. Decision-making around malaria vaccine introduction will take into account, among other things, the malaria control and treatment methods already in use.

<strong>Estimating</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>affordability</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>future</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> vaccines<br />

The project<br />

motivation<br />

National policymakers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders have indicated <strong>the</strong> need for good-quality evidence<br />

on <strong>the</strong> economic efficiency <strong>and</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> vaccines. This is why <strong>the</strong> PATH Malaria Vaccine<br />

Initiative (MVI) is collaborating with <strong>the</strong> Johns Hopkins University, <strong>the</strong> Swiss Tropical <strong>and</strong> Public<br />

Health Institute, <strong>and</strong> researchers in endemic African countries to generate data to address<br />

questions related to <strong>the</strong> <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>affordability</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> vaccines. These data will<br />

help African countries make timely <strong>and</strong> informed decisions about <strong>malaria</strong> vaccine introduction<br />

<strong>and</strong> use, once a vaccine becomes available.<br />

The context<br />

The need to provide <strong>cost</strong>-effective interventions <strong>and</strong> to have information to interpret <strong>and</strong> use<br />

<strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> has been increasingly promoted through high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile calls from national<br />

governments, international agencies, <strong>and</strong> multilateral initiatives, including <strong>the</strong> World Bank’s 1993<br />

World Development Report <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2002 World Health Report (World Health Organization, 2002).<br />

A lack <strong>of</strong> evidence on <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> is thought to have contributed to <strong>the</strong> slow uptake <strong>of</strong><br />

some interventions, such as Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) <strong>and</strong> hepatitis B (HBV) vaccines.<br />

Countries routinely use <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> evidence for making policy decisions. Low- <strong>and</strong> middleincome<br />

countries—such as Ghana <strong>and</strong> Mexico—have used <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> data to prioritize<br />

investments among interventions as part <strong>of</strong> sector-wide decision-making. High-income countries<br />

routinely use economic evaluations to help prioritize health expenditures <strong>and</strong> to increase<br />

efficiency within <strong>the</strong> health sector.<br />

The potential<br />

Decision-making related to <strong>malaria</strong> vaccines may soon enter a complex phase, as countries<br />

consider <strong>the</strong> prospect <strong>of</strong> adopting RTS,S, a first-generation vaccine. If <strong>the</strong> required public health<br />

information, including safety <strong>and</strong> efficacy data from <strong>the</strong> Phase 3 program, is deemed satisfactory,<br />

<strong>the</strong> World Health Organization has indicated that a policy recommendation for <strong>the</strong> RTS,S <strong>malaria</strong><br />

vaccine c<strong>and</strong>idate is possible as early as 2015, paving <strong>the</strong> way for decisions by African nations<br />

regarding large-scale implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vaccine through <strong>the</strong>ir national immunization<br />

programs. Decision-making around <strong>malaria</strong> vaccine introduction will take into account, among<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r things, <strong>the</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> control <strong>and</strong> treatment methods already in use.


To help facilitate <strong>the</strong> decision-making process, MVI is supporting a number <strong>of</strong> studies to provide<br />

policymakers with a set <strong>of</strong> economic estimates, including:<br />

• Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> on households <strong>and</strong> country health systems. This<br />

“<strong>cost</strong>ing” <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong> burden includes both direct <strong>and</strong> indirect out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket expenses incurred<br />

by families to prevent <strong>and</strong> treat <strong>malaria</strong>, <strong>the</strong> productivity loss due to <strong>the</strong> disease, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

socioeconomic distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic burden. Initial countries in this multi-country<br />

study include Burkina Faso, Ghana, Nigeria, <strong>and</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a. Country selection is based primarily<br />

on disease burden, <strong>the</strong> endemicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> economic data.<br />

• Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cost</strong>-<strong>effectiveness</strong> <strong>of</strong> adding a <strong>malaria</strong> vaccine to current <strong>malaria</strong>-control<br />

measures. These estimates will be produced based upon <strong>the</strong> “<strong>cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> illness” data collected,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in collaboration with <strong>the</strong> Swiss Tropical <strong>and</strong> Public Health Institute’s model.<br />

• Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget impact <strong>of</strong> introducing a <strong>malaria</strong> vaccine into health systems. This<br />

corresponds to <strong>the</strong> incremental <strong>cost</strong> <strong>of</strong> vaccine implementation relative to each country’s<br />

gross national income; such evidence is important for planning as well as for advocacy at<br />

national <strong>and</strong> global levels.<br />

MVI will continue to support countries as <strong>the</strong>y prepare to decide about <strong>malaria</strong> vaccine<br />

introduction.<br />

References<br />

The World Bank, International Bank for Reconstruction <strong>and</strong> Development. World Development<br />

Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 1993.<br />

World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy<br />

Life. Geneva, CH: WHO; 2002.<br />

THE PATH MALARIA VACCINE INITIATIVE (MVI) is a global program established at PATH through an initial<br />

grant from <strong>the</strong> Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. MVI’s mission is to accelerate <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>malaria</strong><br />

vaccines <strong>and</strong> ensure <strong>the</strong>ir availability <strong>and</strong> accessibility in <strong>the</strong> developing world. MVI’s vision is a world free<br />

from <strong>malaria</strong>. For more information, visit www.<strong>malaria</strong>vaccine.org.<br />

PATH is an international nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organization that creates sustainable, culturally relevant solutions,<br />

enabling communities worldwide to break longst<strong>and</strong>ing cycles <strong>of</strong> poor health. By collaborating with diverse<br />

public- <strong>and</strong> private-sector partners, PATH helps provide appropriate health technologies <strong>and</strong> vital strategies<br />

that change <strong>the</strong> way people think <strong>and</strong> act. PATH’s work improves global health <strong>and</strong> well-being. For more<br />

information, visit www.path.org.<br />

February 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!