27.01.2015 Views

2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...

2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...

2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 An Act providing for the organisation of the Department of the Secretary of State of<br />

Canada, and for the management of Indian and Ordinance Lands, S.C. 1868, c. 42, s.15.<br />

The definition was virtually identical to that in the 1850 Lower Canada legislation (see<br />

note 15).<br />

21 An Act for the gradual enfranchisement of Indians, the better management of Indian<br />

affairs, and to extend the provisions of the Act 31st Victoria, Chapter 42, S.C. 1869, c. 6.<br />

22 Some of these measures were as follows: instituting a system of individual property<br />

holding on reserves; permitting the imposition of the three-year elective system for chiefs<br />

and councillors on chosen bands; limiting the powers of elected councils to a list of<br />

relatively minor matters, all subject to official confirmation; providing that an<br />

enfranchised Indian man could draw up a will regarding his land in favour of his children,<br />

but not his wife, in accordance with provincial law. Originally designed for the more<br />

"advanced' Indians of Ontario and Quebec, this legislation was later extended to<br />

Manitoba and British Columbia and eventually to all of Canada.<br />

23 Letter from Hector Langevin to Sawatis Anionkiu Peter Karencho and other Iroquois<br />

Indians, Caughnawaga, Quebec (20 August 1869), National Archives of Canada [NAC],<br />

Record Group [RG] 10, Vol. 528. See also D.E. Sanders, "The Bill of Rights and Indian<br />

Status" (1972) 7 U.B.C. L. Rev. 81 at 98.<br />

24 In the modern version of the Indian Act, location tickets have been replaced by<br />

certificates of possession and occupation. The concept in the modern act is similar to that<br />

in the 1869 legislation, however.<br />

25 Objections were raised early on by <strong>Aboriginal</strong> groups. In 1872, the Grand Council of<br />

Ontario and Quebec Indians (founded in 1870) sent the minister in Ottawa a strong letter<br />

that contained the following passage:<br />

They [the members of the Grand Council] also desire amendments to Sec. 6 of the Act of<br />

[18]69 so that Indian women may have the privilege of marrying when and whom they<br />

please, without subjecting themselves to exclusion or expulsion from their tribes and the<br />

consequent loss of property and rights they may have by virtue of their being members of<br />

any particular tribe. (NAC RG10, Red Series, Vol. 1934, file 3541)<br />

These requests, of course, went unheeded. See also John Leslie and Ron Maguire, eds.,<br />

The Historical Development of the Indian Act (Ottawa: Department of Indian Affairs and<br />

Northern Development, Treaties and Historical Research Centre, 1978), p. 55.<br />

26 J.R. Miller, Skyscrapers Hide the Heavens: A History of Indian-White Relations in<br />

Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989), pp. 194-195.<br />

27 An Act to further amend "The Indian Act, 1880", S.C. 1884, c. 27, s. 5.<br />

28 An Act to amend the Indian Act, S.C. 1920, c. 50, s. <strong>2.</strong><br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!