2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
houses, the people have no more room….There is a terrible lack of space so the issue of<br />
re-registration is strongly linked to the issue of land. [translation]<br />
Michèle Rouleau<br />
Quebec Native <strong>Women's</strong> Association<br />
Montreal, Quebec, 27 May 1993<br />
The testimony of many First Nations women before the Commission points to their<br />
determination to fight against discrimination and policies of exclusion:<br />
In short, an epic struggle which has left its mark has contributed to our understanding of<br />
the obstacles, in particular the strength of the prejudices and ravages caused by the Indian<br />
Act, but which has above all helped to strengthen the determination of the <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />
women to fight discrimination wherever it is found, beginning with the discrimination<br />
that operates at the grassroots in the communities. [translation]<br />
Philo Desterres<br />
Quebec Native <strong>Women's</strong> Association<br />
Montreal, Quebec, 27 May 1993<br />
In the next few pages we examine the major areas that concern Indian women in the<br />
current version of the Indian Act. In some cases, women are not the only ones affected.<br />
However, because the majority of people restored to Indian status under the 1985<br />
amendments were women, they feel the impact more profoundly and encounter these<br />
obstacles more often than do <strong>Aboriginal</strong> men.<br />
Indian status under section 6<br />
Though I regained my status under Bill C-31, my children were denied status. The<br />
children of my male cousin, who traces his descent from our common grandmother<br />
through the male line, have full status. I am challenging this inequality in another court<br />
case, pending in British Columbia. 57<br />
Sharon McIvor<br />
Native <strong>Women's</strong> Association of Canada<br />
Toronto, Ontario, 26 June 1992<br />
First Nations women told the Commission that Bill C-31 has created a situation where,<br />
over time, their descendants may be stripped of their Indian status and rights in some<br />
circumstances in which Indian men and their descendants would be unaffected. The<br />
discrepancy arises out of the categories used to designate Indian status under Bill C-31.<br />
The bill created two main categories of status Indians. Under subsection 6(1), legal status<br />
is assigned to all those who had status before 17 April 1985, all persons who are<br />
members of any new bands created since 17 April 1985 (none have been created), and all<br />
individuals who lost status through the discriminatory sections of the Indian Act. More<br />
specifically, these classes of persons are as follows:<br />
36