2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
2. Women's Perspectives - Christian Aboriginal Infrastructure ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Michèle Rouleau<br />
Quebec Native <strong>Women's</strong> Association<br />
Montreal, Quebec, 27 May 1993<br />
Of the applications received by mid-1990, 55 per cent (73,554) of all individuals seeking<br />
registration had been approved, 16 per cent (21,397) were disallowed, 8 per cent were<br />
active files, 9 per cent were inactive files, and 12 per cent were classified as "other<br />
completions". Of the 8 per cent classified as active, the majority were those requiring<br />
additional information from the applicant. Of the 16 per cent disallowed, three-quarters<br />
were denied registration under subsection 6(2), which provides that individuals seeking<br />
registration must establish that one parent is entitled to registration under subsection<br />
6(1). 50<br />
As of 30 June 1995, Bill C-31 had added 95,429 persons to the status Indian population<br />
in Canada, more than half of them (57.2 per cent, 54,589) female. 51 The enormous<br />
increase in the status Indian population did not result in an equal increase in the<br />
population of reserve communities. This is largely because most persons restored to<br />
Indian status or with first-time status under Bill C-31 still live off-reserve. 52 Through its<br />
survey of 2,000 registrants, the study found that 32 per cent of those individuals currently<br />
living off-reserve would like to live on a reserve. To a second survey question asking<br />
registrants living off-reserve if they might return to a reserve or Crown land at some time<br />
in the future, 52 per cent replied in the affirmative and another 15 per cent were<br />
uncertain. 53<br />
Although most Bill C-31 registrants continue to live off-reserve, it is not always by<br />
choice, since it has been difficult for some of them to get reserve residency rights even<br />
when they are band members (an issue discussed later in this chapter). Some bands<br />
experienced significant population increases from Bill C-31 registrants while others had<br />
none. The average band increased in size by 19 per cent, although 80 per cent of the<br />
bands had fewer than 15 Bill C-31 registrants living on-reserve. (It is estimated that 4,600<br />
of the Bill C-31 registrants lived on reserve in 1984 and that 2,700 more had moved to a<br />
reserve between 1985 and 1990. 54 )<br />
Clearly, the full impact of Bill C-31 on reserve communities has yet to be felt. Some band<br />
leaders and community members are concerned about the possibility of crowding and<br />
disruption and have been resistant to inclusion of new band members in their<br />
communities. Services that could be affected by a population increase include housing,<br />
health and post-secondary education.<br />
Indian women have their own concerns about Bill C-31. Women make up the majority of<br />
people reinstated under the bill, and fully three-quarters of those whose Indian status was<br />
restored — as opposed to those who gained status for the first time — are women. 55<br />
Despite its avowed intent of bringing about sexual equality in the status and membership<br />
provisions of the Indian Act, Bill C-31 is nonetheless seen by many <strong>Aboriginal</strong> women as<br />
a continuation of the sexist policies of the past.<br />
34