Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ... Final Environmental Impact Report - Whittier Bridge/I-95 ...

mhd.state.ma.us
from mhd.state.ma.us More from this publisher
27.01.2015 Views

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report Response: MassDOT has committed to construction procedures which will limit the installation or removal of temporary cofferdams to a single location at any one time. The cofferdam restriction was included in a letter from NMFS, dated November 29, 2011, which included the following Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations: 1. All in-water work should take place within cofferdams as shown on the project plans. The installation of the cofferdams should only be conducted one at a time, to minimize noise and/or turbidity impacts. 2. From April 1 through June 30 of any year, at least one of the channels should remain unobstructed at all times to minimize impacts to Atlantic salmon migration. 3. From April 1 through June 30 of any year, an observer should be present on-site at the time of the installation of the cofferdams. If Atlantic salmon or other anadromous species are observed in the work area, the in-water work should be delayed until they have passed through. Prior to cofferdam installation, MassDOT should submit an observer plan to us for approval. MassDOT has committed to compliance with these conditions as outlined by NMFS. EEA-21: The FEIR should confirm that NHESP's conditional no-take determination is still valid subsequent to submission of any additional information or consultation. Response: MassDOT has confirmed with NHESP that the previously issued no-take determination is still valid for the project. EEA-22: The FEIR should clarify the impacts, beneficial and adverse, to wildlife habitats under NHESP and MassDEP jurisdiction and discuss whether mitigation is required. Response: It was mistakenly stated in the EA/DEIR that existing culverts under I-95 would be enlarged as a result of construction activities. It has been determined that no existing culverts would be enlarged for the project; highway widening activities north of the Route 110 interchange will be restricted to the median and will not require modification of existing culverts. One culvert, located between the Merrimack River and Route 110 in Amesbury will be lengthened to accommodate the relocation of I-95 northbound. There are no impacts to wildlife habitat by the project, so no mitigation is required. Wildlife habitat enhancement includes widening the existing wildlife passage under the Whittier Bridge by relocating bridge abutments farther back from the Merrimack River shoreline, providing an enlarged corridor within the Riverfront Area along the river banks, and consequently promoting wildlife connectivity between areas east and west of I-95, an important wildlife corridor. EEA-23: The FEIR should confirm the project's compliance with 310 CMR 10.00 and 314 CMR 9.00 as it relates to protection of Bartlett Spring Pond. Specifically, as recommended by MassDEP, the FEIR should demonstrate that the proposed pervious 12-foot-wide road proposed for construction in the 200-foot Riverfront Area to the Merrimack River 2-8

Whittier Bridge/I-95 Improvement Project FEIR Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the Environmental Assessment/Draft Environmental Impact Report (within the Zone A) complies with 310 CMR 22.20B and C, and with applicable stormwater regulatory standards specified at 310 CMR 10.05(6)(k)(l10) and 314 CMR 9.06(6)(a)(l-10). MassDOT intends to use the road for inspection and maintenance of the City of Newburyport's drinking water supply lines from the Bartlett Spring Treatment Plant. Response: The existing City of Newburyport drinking water lines would be impacted by the project and require relocation. The gravel utility road within the RFA will follow the route of the relocated water supply lines from the water treatment plant at Bartlett Spring Pond and will be used solely by the water department for maintenance and inspection of the relocated water lines. No public vehicles will be allowed to use the roadway and very minimal water department traffic is anticipated, on the order of several trips per month on average. The provisions of the Drinking Water Regulations at 310 CMR 22.20C(2)(l) prohibit within the Zone A of Bartlett Springs Pond ―land uses that result in the rendering impervious of more than 15%, or more than 20% with artificial recharge, or 2500 square feet of any lot, whichever is greater.‖ The proposed access road will be comprised of either crushed stone or open course gravel and is not considered to be an impervious surface, thus meeting that standard and applicable stormwater standards. EEA-24: I have received a number of comments requesting that MassDOT provide mitigation from noise impacts to residential receptors. The FEIR should respond to these comments from receptors who will impacted by future noise conditions. Response: The traffic-noise mitigation analysis was completed in accordance with updated FHWA and MassDOT policy. The Traffic Noise Model was used to evaluate the noise reduction performance and cost-effectiveness of numerous candidate noise barriers. Although a number of receptors have been identified as impacted by existing and future noise conditions, no noise barriers can be justified as being ―feasible‖ and ―reasonable‖ in accordance with the MassDOT policy; not enough receptors benefit from the noise reduction to meet the ―per benefitted receptor‖ cost basis. Consequently, noise barriers will not be included in the project. EEA-25: The FEIR should evaluate the feasibility of increasing the height and extending the length of the existing articulated barrier adjacent to the Laurel Road neighborhood. Response: Two receptors on Laurel Road were impacted by existing and future traffic noise. Dozens of alternatives for a noise barrier in the Laurel Road area were evaluated (Noise Barrier No. 2). The optimal barrier height and length for noise reduction resulted in a cost effectiveness index (CEI) twice the acceptable CEI limit. An inadequate shorter length barrier built on top of the existing barrier (i.e., less expensive) was also evaluated, but the CEI value still exceeded the limit. Therefore, in accordance with the MassDOT Noise Policy, a longer and taller noise barrier in this location is not feasible and reasonable and cannot be constructed for the project. The project will relocate the existing articulated noise barrier within the limits of the I-95 ROW in order to accommodate the construction of the Shared-Use Path. 2-9

<strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong>/I-<strong>95</strong> Improvement Project FEIR<br />

Chapter 2.0: Response to Comments on the <strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment/Draft <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Response: MassDOT has committed to construction procedures which will limit the installation or<br />

removal of temporary cofferdams to a single location at any one time. The cofferdam restriction was<br />

included in a letter from NMFS, dated November 29, 2011, which included the following Essential<br />

Fish Habitat conservation recommendations:<br />

1. All in-water work should take place within cofferdams as shown on the project plans. The<br />

installation of the cofferdams should only be conducted one at a time, to minimize noise<br />

and/or turbidity impacts.<br />

2. From April 1 through June 30 of any year, at least one of the channels should remain<br />

unobstructed at all times to minimize impacts to Atlantic salmon migration.<br />

3. From April 1 through June 30 of any year, an observer should be present on-site at the time<br />

of the installation of the cofferdams. If Atlantic salmon or other anadromous species are<br />

observed in the work area, the in-water work should be delayed until they have passed<br />

through. Prior to cofferdam installation, MassDOT should submit an observer plan to us for<br />

approval.<br />

MassDOT has committed to compliance with these conditions as outlined by NMFS.<br />

EEA-21: The FEIR should confirm that NHESP's conditional no-take determination is still valid subsequent to<br />

submission of any additional information or consultation.<br />

Response: MassDOT has confirmed with NHESP that the previously issued no-take determination<br />

is still valid for the project.<br />

EEA-22: The FEIR should clarify the impacts, beneficial and adverse, to wildlife habitats under NHESP and<br />

MassDEP jurisdiction and discuss whether mitigation is required.<br />

Response: It was mistakenly stated in the EA/DEIR that existing culverts under I-<strong>95</strong> would be<br />

enlarged as a result of construction activities. It has been determined that no existing culverts would<br />

be enlarged for the project; highway widening activities north of the Route 110 interchange will be<br />

restricted to the median and will not require modification of existing culverts. One culvert, located<br />

between the Merrimack River and Route 110 in Amesbury will be lengthened to accommodate the<br />

relocation of I-<strong>95</strong> northbound.<br />

There are no impacts to wildlife habitat by the project, so no mitigation is required. Wildlife habitat<br />

enhancement includes widening the existing wildlife passage under the <strong>Whittier</strong> <strong>Bridge</strong> by relocating<br />

bridge abutments farther back from the Merrimack River shoreline, providing an enlarged corridor<br />

within the Riverfront Area along the river banks, and consequently promoting wildlife connectivity<br />

between areas east and west of I-<strong>95</strong>, an important wildlife corridor.<br />

EEA-23: The FEIR should confirm the project's compliance with 310 CMR 10.00 and 314 CMR 9.00 as it relates to<br />

protection of Bartlett Spring Pond. Specifically, as recommended by MassDEP, the FEIR should demonstrate that the<br />

proposed pervious 12-foot-wide road proposed for construction in the 200-foot Riverfront Area to the Merrimack River<br />

2-8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!